Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T12:54:49.737Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

October 2019–January 2020

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 May 2020

Frank Cranmer
Frank Cranmer*
Affiliation:
Fellow, St Chad's College, Durham Honorary Research Fellow, Centre for Law and Religion, Cardiff University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The Supreme Court ruled unanimously in the conjoined cases of Miller and Cherry that the advice given by the Prime Minister to Her Majesty that Parliament should be prorogued from a date between 9 and 12 September until 14 October was unlawful, and that the resulting Order in Council and the prorogation itself were also unlawful, void and of no effect – so it was back to the constitutional drawing-board. Parliament was subsequently prorogued from 8 to 14 October, sat until 5 November and was dissolved at 00.01 am on the following day.

Type
Government and Parliamentary Report
Information
Ecclesiastical Law Journal , Volume 22 , Issue 2 , May 2020 , pp. 251 - 255
Copyright
Copyright © Ecclesiastical Law Society 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 R (Miller) v The Prime Minister [2019] UKSC 41 and Cherry and Ors v Advocate General for Scotland.

2 Owens v Owens [2018] UKSC 41.

3 At <http://www.churchofengland.org> and <http://www.churchsupporthub.org>, accessed 12 February 2020.

4 HL Deb 30 January 2020, vol 801, cols 1608–1612.

5 Available at <https://www.churchofengland.org/more/policy-and-thinking/church-representation-rules/church-representation-rules-online-contents>, accessed 7 February 2020.

6 Available at <https://www.churchofengland.org/more/policy-and-thinking/church-representation-rules/church-representation-rules-online-introduction>, accessed 7 February 2020.

7 Available at <https://www.churchofengland.org/sites/default/files/2019-12/FJR%202015%20as%20amended%20by%20FJ%28A%29R%202019.pdf>, accessed 7 February 2020.

8 Under ‘general queries’: see <http://www.lpwscheme.org.uk/frequently_asked_questions.html>, accessed 7 February 2020.

9 The response is available at <https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/843876/independant-inquiry-child-sexual-abuse-letter.pdf>, accessed 7 February 2020.

10 Available at <https://thirtyoneeight.org/media/2566/appg_report_positions_of_trust_jan2020_thirtyoneeight.pdf>, accessed 7 February 2020.

11 Available at <https://gov.wales/sites/default/files/consultations/2019-10/consultation-document-ensuring-access-to-the-full-curriculum_0.pdf>, accessed 7 February 2020.