No CrossRef data available.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 31 July 2008
This paper had its origin in an excursus to the dissertation offered in part requirement for the University of Wales LLM degree in Ecclesiastical and Canon Law. Like all work on Colenso, it is indebted to the magisterial investigations of the late Peter Hinchliff, in whose biography of Colenso will be found an extensive bibliography to 1964. Later sources are itemised in this paper.
1 Jones, T H. ‘Law and the Suppression of Heresy in the English Church: an Historical Survey’ University of Wales LL M dissertation (Cardiff. 1994).Google Scholar
2 Hinchliff, P. ‘John William Colenso: A Fresh Appraisal’. Journal of Ecclesiastical History XIII (a paper originally read to the John Mason Neale Society. 7 February 1962)Google Scholar: Hinchliff, P. The Anglican Church in South Africa (London. 1963)Google Scholar: Hinchliff, P. John William Colenso: Bishop of Natal (London. 1964).Google Scholar
3 Colenso, J W. Ten Weeks in Natal (London. 1854).Google Scholar
4 Colenso, J W. Commentary on the Epistle to the Romans, newly translated and explained from a missionary point of view (London. 1861)Google Scholar (hereafter cited as Romans); Colenso, J W. Critical Examination of the Pentateuch and the Book of Joshua (London. 1862–1879)Google Scholar (hereafter cited as Pentateuch).
5 Hinchliff, P. The Anglican Church in South Africa, p 27.Google Scholar
6 Wirgman, A T. Life of James Green (2 vols. London. 1909).Google Scholar
7 Ellis, I. Seven Against Christ: a study of ‘Essays ami Reviews’ (Leiden. 1980)Google Scholar: Waddams, S M, Law, Politics ami the Church of England: The Career of Stephen Lushington 1782–1873 (Cambridge, 1992). pp 310–47. 7.Google Scholar
8 Hinchliff, P. John William Colenso: Bishop of Natal, p 79.Google Scholar
9 Arnold, M. ‘The Bishop and the Philosopher’ in Neiman, F (ed) Essays. Letters and Reviews by Matthew Arnold (Cambridge, 1960). pp 46, 50, 51.Google Scholar
10 Chadwick, OThe Victorian Church (2 vols. London, 1966–1970). vol II. p 91.Google Scholar
11 Guy, J. The Heretic: A Study of the Life of John William Colenso 1814 1883 (Pietermaritzburg. 1983).Google Scholar Pt 2. passim. Like Hinchliff. Guy had access to South African sources not easily obtainable by those not based in the Republic. Disclaiming biographical status, this is nonetheless the best current conspectus of Colenso material.
12 Guy, J. The Heretic: A Study of the Life of John William Colenso 1814–1883. p 181.Google Scholar
13 Prothero, R P and Bradley, G CLife and Correspondence of A P Stanley (London. 1893). vol II. p 100Google Scholar (Stanley to Jowett).
14 Report of the Case of the Reverend Mr Long (London. 1861).Google Scholar and Bishopscourt Archives. Cape Town. Folio I. The judgment is also printed in an appendix to Gray, C NLife of Robert Gray, Bishop of Cape Town and Metropolitan of Africa (London. 1876).Google Scholar The judgment of the Privy Council was not delivered until 24 June 1863: Long v Bishop of Cape Town (1863) 1 Moo PCCNS 411.Google Scholar
15 Report of the Trial of Bishop Colenso. pp 38 ff.Google Scholar
16 Hinchliff, P. John William Colenso: Bishop of Natal, p 138.Google Scholar
17 Williams v Bishop of Salisbury (1864) 2 Moo PCCNS 375Google Scholar: Cox, G WThe Life of John William Colenso DD. Bishop of Natal (2 vols. London. 1888). vol I. pp 252. 257.Google Scholar
18 See note 14 above.
19 Long v Bishop of Cape Town (1863) 1 Moo PCCNS411.Google Scholar
20 Cox, G WThe Life of John William Colenso, DD, Bishop of Natal, vol I. p 279.Google Scholar
21 Practice and Jurisdiction of the Ecclesiastical Courts in England and Wales R Com Rep 1831–32 (190) XXIV.I. The statutes creating the new jurisdiction were the Privy Council Appeals Act 1832 (2 & 3 Will 4. c 92) and the Judicial Committee Act 1833 (3 & 4 Will 4. c 41).
22 Duncan, G I O. The High Court of Delegates (Cambridge. 1971), ch 1.Google Scholar
23 Usher, R G. The Rise and Fall of the High Commission (Oxford, 1913).Google Scholar
24 I understand that a fellow-member of the Ecclesiastical Law Society. Professor S M Waddams. is preparing a major work on the Judicial Committee. We eagerly await its appearance.
25 Re Lord Bishop of Natal (1865) 3 Moo PCCNS 115.Google Scholar
26 Selborne, Lord. Memorials, Family and Personal (2 vols. London. 1896). vol II. p 482:Google ScholarSelborne, Lord. A Defence of the Church of England Against Disestablishment (London. 1887). pp 205 ff.Google Scholar
27 Bishop of Natal v Gladstone (1866) LR 3 Eq 1.Google Scholar
28 ‘He seems to have hinted to Stanley that an English canonry might be the best niche for him to retire to’: Hinchliff, P. John William Colenso: Bishop of Natal, p 129. note 3.Google Scholar
29 Colenso, J W. Natal Sermons, Second Series (London, 1868). pp 144 ff.Google Scholar
30 Carpenter, S C. Church and People 1789–1889 (London. 1933), pp 145. 146.Google Scholar
31 For some parallel material on Colenso, particularly in the light of the Lambeth Conference, see Kemp, E ‘Legal Implications of Lambeth’ (1989) 1 Eccl L J (5) 15–23.Google Scholar
32 Eg in Herd, N. The Bent Pine (The trial of Chief Langalibalele) (Johannesburg. 1976).Google Scholar
You have
Access