Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T13:10:29.687Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A New Fourth-Order Compact Off-Step Discretization for the System of 2D Nonlinear Elliptic Partial Differential Equations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 May 2015

R. K. Mohanty*
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Mathematical Sciences, University of Delhi, Delhi-110007, India
Nikita Setia*
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Mathematical Sciences, University of Delhi, Delhi-110007, India
*
Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]
Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

This paper discusses a new fourth-order compact off-step discretization for the solution of a system of two-dimensional nonlinear elliptic partial differential equations subject to Dirichlet boundary conditions. New methods to obtain the fourth-order accurate numerical solution of the first order normal derivatives of the solution are also derived. In all cases, we use only nine grid points to compute the solution. The proposed methods are directly applicable to singular problems and problems in polar coordinates, which is a main attraction. The convergence analysis of the derived method is discussed in detail. Several physical problems are solved to demonstrate the usefulness of the proposed methods.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Global-Science Press 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1]Li, M., Tang, T., Fornberg, B., A compact fourth-order finite difference scheme for the steady state incompressible Navier Stokes equations, Int. J. Numer. Meth. Fluids, 20 (1995) 11371151.Google Scholar
[2]Spotz, W.F., Carey, G.F, High Order Compact scheme for the steady stream function vorticity equations, Int. J. Numer. Meth. Eng., 38 (1995) 34973512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]Jain, M.K., Jain, R.K., Mohanty, R.K., Fourth order difference methods for the system of 2-D nonlinear elliptic PDEs, Numer. Meth. Partial Diff. Eqns., 7 (1991) 227244.Google Scholar
[4]Ananthakrishnaiah, U., Saldanha, G., A fourth-order finite difference scheme for 2D nonlinear elliptic PDEs, Numer. Meth. Partial Diff. Eqns., 11 (1995) 3340.Google Scholar
[5]Gupta, M.M., A fourth-order poisson solver, J. Comp. Phys., 55 (1984) 166172.Google Scholar
[6]Gupta, M.M., Manohar, R.M., Stephenson, J.H., A Single cell high order scheme for the convection-diffusion equation with variable coefficients Int. J. Numer. Meth. Fluids, 4 (1984) 641651.Google Scholar
[7]Yavneh, I.V., Analysis of a fourth-order compact scheme for convection diffusion, J. Comp. Phys., 133 (1997) 361364.Google Scholar
[8]Jain, M.K., Jain, R.K., Krishna, M., Fourth order difference method for quasi-linear Poisson equation in cylindrical symmetry, Comm. Numer. Meth. Eng., 10 (1994) 291296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9]Zhang, J., On convergence of iterative methods for a fourth-order discretization scheme, App. Math. Letters, 10 (1997) 4955.Google Scholar
[10]Zhang, J., On Convergence and performance of iterative methods with Fourth order Compact Schemes, Numer. Meth. Partial Diff. Eqns., 14 (1998) 263280.Google Scholar
[11]Carey, G.F., Computational Grids: Generation, Adaption and Solution Strategies, Taylor and Francis, Washington, DC, 1997.Google Scholar
[12]Mohanty, R.K., Order difference methods for a class of singular two-space dimensional elliptic boundary value problems, Numer. Meth. Partial Diff. Eqns., 81 (1997) 229247.Google Scholar
[13]Mohanty, R.K., Dey, S., A new finite difference discretization of order four for 2D quasi-linear elliptic boundary value problems, Int. J. Comp. Math., 76 (2001) 505576.Google Scholar
[14]Mohanty, R.K., Singh, S., A new fourth-order discretization for singularly perturbed two dimensional nonlinear elliptic boundary value problems, App. Math. Comp., 175 (2006) 14001414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[15]Chawla, M.M., Shivakumar, P.N., An efficient finite difference method for two-point boundary value problems, Neur. Par. Sci. Comp., 4 (1996) 387396.Google Scholar
[16]Stephenson, J.W., Single cell discretization of order two and four for biharmonic problems, J. Comp. Phys., 55 (1984) 6580.Google Scholar
[17]Mohanty, R.K., Karaa, S., Arora, U., Fourth order nine-point unequal mesh discretization for the Solution of 2-D nonlinear elliptic PDEs, Neur. Par. Sci. Comp., 14 (2006) 453470.Google Scholar
[18]Saldanha, G., Technical Note: A Fourth order finite difference scheme for a system of 2D nonlinear elliptic PDEs, Numer. Meth. Partial Diff. Eqns., 17 (2001) 4353.3.0.CO;2-H>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[19]Ito, K., Qiao, Z., A high order compact MAC finite difference scheme for the Stokes equations: Augmented variable approach, J. Comp. Phys., 227 (2008) 81778190.Google Scholar
[20]Erturk, E., Gökcöl, C., Fourth-order compact formulation of Navier-Stokes equations and driven cavity flow at high Reynolds numbers, Int. J. Numer. Meth. Fluids, 50 (2006) 421436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[21]Liu, J., Wang, C., A fourth-order numerical method for the primitive equations formulated in mean vorticity, Comm. Comp. Phys., 4 (2008) 2655.Google Scholar
[22]Kelly, C.T., Iterative Methods for Linear and Non-Linear Equations, SIAM Publications, Philadelphia, 1995.Google Scholar
[23]Varga, R.S., Matrix Iterative Analysis, Springer, New York, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[24]Saad, Y., Iterative Methods for Sparse Linear Systems, SIAM Publisher, Philadelphia, 2003.Google Scholar
[25]Hageman, L.A., Young, D.M., Applied Iterative Methods, Dover Publication, New York, 2004.Google Scholar
[26]Henrici, P., Discrete Variable Methods in Ordinary Differential Equations, Wiley, New York, 1962.Google Scholar