Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-04T20:11:03.994Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

H1 Stability and Convergence of the FE, FV and FD Methods for an Elliptic Equation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 May 2015

Yinnian He*
Affiliation:
Center for Computational Geosciences, School of Mathematics and Statistics, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an 710049, China
Xinlong Feng*
Affiliation:
College of Mathematics and Systems Science, Xinjiang University, Urumqi 830046, China
*
Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]
Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

We obtain the coefficient matrices of the finite element (FE), finite volume (FV) and finite difference (FD) methods based on P1-conforming elements on a quasi-uniform mesh, in order to approximately solve a boundary value problem involving the elliptic Poisson equation. The three methods are shown to possess the same H1-stability and convergence. Some numerical tests are made, to compare the numerical results from the three methods and to review our theoretical results.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Global-Science Press 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1]Bank, R.E., Rose, D.J., Some error estimates for the box method, SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 24, 777787 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2]Ben-Artzi, M., Croisille, J. P. and Fishelov, D., Convergence of a compact scheme for the pure streamfunction formulation of the unsteady Navier-Stokes equations, SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 44, 19972024 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]Cai, Z., On the finite volume element method, Numer. Math. 58, 713735 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]Chen, L., A new class of high order finite volume methods for second order elliptic equations, SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 47, 40214043 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5]Ciarlet, P. G., The Finite Element Method for Elliptic Problems. North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1978.Google Scholar
[6]Ewing, R.E., Lin, T., Lin, Y., On the accuracy of the finite volume element method based on piecewise linear polynomials, SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 39, 18651888 (2002).Google Scholar
[7]Hackbusch, W., On first and second order box methods, Computing 41, 277296 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8]Li, R., Chen, Z., Wu, W., Generalized difference methods for differential equations—Numerical analysis of finite volume methods. Marcel Dekker, Inc, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9]Ma, Y., Mei, L., Wang, A., Modern Numerical Methods for Partial Differential Equations. Science Press, Beijing, 2006.Google Scholar
[10]Rannacher, R., Scott, R., Some optimal error estimates for piecewise linear finite element approximation, Math. Comp. 38, 437445 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[11]Süli, E., Convergence of finite volume schemes for Poisson's equation on nonuniform meshes, SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 28, 14191430 (1991).Google Scholar
[12]Thomas, J.W., Numerical Partial Differential Equations – Finite Difference Methods. Springer-Verlag New York, Inc, 1998.Google Scholar
[13]Thomas, J.W., Numerical Partial Differential Equations – Conservation Laws and Elliptic Equations. Springer-Verlag New York, Inc, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[14]Saad, Y., Iterative Methods for Sparse Linear Systems, 2nd edition. SIAM, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[15]Xu, J., Two-grid discretisation techniques for linear and nonlinear PDEs, SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 33, 17591777 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[16]Xu, J., Zou, Q., Analysis of linear and quadratic simplicial finite volume methods for elliptic equations, Numer. Math. 111, 469492 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[17]Vanselow, R., Relations between FEM and FVM applied to the Poisson equation, Computing 57, 93104 (1996).Google Scholar
[18]Mattiussi, C., An analysis of finite volume, finite element, and finite difference methods using some concepts from algebraic topology, J. Comput. Phys. 133, 289309 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar