Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T06:05:52.129Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

XXV.—The Mineralogy and Metamorphism of the Moine Schists of the Morar and Knoydart Districts of Inverness-shire

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 July 2012

R. St J. Lambert
R. St J. Lambert*
Affiliation:
Department of Geology and Mineralogy, Oxford.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Synopsis

This study of the mineralogy and metamorphism of the Moine schists approaches the problem through consideration of the chemical composition of the minerals. The principal minerals of the Moine schists are studied individually, thirty-three new analyses of minerals being given, with four of schists. For all but six analyses the trace elements have been determined and are tabulated. Muscovites, biotites and garnets all show variation of composition with increasing metamorphic grade, respectively with decreasing Fe2O3 and SiO2, increasing MgO and Al2O3, and decreasing CaO plus increasing MgO, these being only the principal variations. The crystal chemistry of the muscovites, biotites and garnets is briefly discussed. Some new data are presented for the relationship of plagioclase and epidote, a relationship which can only be used with extreme caution to indicate metamorphic grade. A dependence of the incidence of a sutured quartz aggregate in psammitic schists upon the microcline content is noted, and it is suggested that the incidence of the breakdown of quartz under the combined effect of temperature (the dominant cause), stress and potassio solutions, all active in the core, is responsible for the production of the core-envelope boundary. This boundary transgresses the strike; within it retrogressive changes have converted Garnet-zone schists to Biotite-zone schists, but outside it the only retrogressive change is garnet to chlorite. The retrogressive metamorphism formed a distinct episode separated from the initial regional metamorphism by an unknown time-interval; during the second metamorphism isotherms were concentric with the dome, declining outwards. The evidence of an epidiorite from the west coast of Morar suggests that during the first metamorphism the zonal state there was that of the Dalradian Biotite-zone; “almandine” garnets in the adjacent schists are extremely rich in CaO and are in equilibrium with microcline.

Type
Research Article
Information
Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of The Royal Society of Edinburgh , Volume 63 , Issue 3 , 1959 , pp. 553 - 588
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1959

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References to Literature

Abelson, P. H., 1965. Rep. Geophys. Lab. Carneg. Instn., 1954–55.Google Scholar
Alderman, A. R., 1936. “Eclogites from the Neighbourhood of Glenelg, Inverness-shire”, Quart. J. Geol. Soc., 92, 488–530.Google Scholar
Ambrose, J. W., 1936. “Progressive Kinetic Metamorphism in the Missi Series near Flinflon, Manitoba”, Amer. J. Sci., 32, 257–286.Google Scholar
Barrow, G., 1893. “On an Intrusion of Muscovite-biotite Gneiss in the South-east Highlands of Scotland”, Quart. J. Geol. Soc., 49, 330–358.Google Scholar
Barth, T. F. W., 1936. “Structural and Petrologic Studies in Dutchess County, New York, Pt. II”, Bull. Geol. Soc. Amer., 47, 776–850.Google Scholar
Boeke, H. E., 1916. “Die Grenzen der Mischkristallbildung in Muscovit und Biotit”, Neues Jb. Min. Geol. Palœont., 1, 83–117.Google Scholar
Chayes, F., 1952. “Relations between the Composition and Indices of Refraction of Natural Plagioclase”, Amer. J. Sci., Bowen Vol., 85–105.Google Scholar
Clough, C. T., 1910. In “The Geology of Glenelg, Lochalsh and the South-east Part of Skye”, Mem. Geol. Surv. U.K.Google Scholar
Engel, A. E. J., and Engel, C. G., 1955. “Variations in the Properties of a Paragneiss and its Constituent Minerals (etc.)”, Bull. Geol. Soc. Amer., 66, 1554 (abst.).Google Scholar
Goldsmith, J. R., and Laves, F., 1954. “Potassium Felspars structurally intermediate between Microcline and Sanidine”, Geochim. et Cosmoch. Acta, 6, 100–118.Google Scholar
Griggs, D., and Bell, J. F., 1938. “Experiments bearing on the Orientation of Quartz in Deformed Rocks”, Bull. Geol. Soc. Amer., 49, 1723–1746.Google Scholar
Harker, R. I., 1954. “The Occurrence of Orthoclase and Microcline in the Granitic Gneisses of the Cam Chuinneag-Inchbae Complex, East Ross-shire”, Geol. Mag., 91, 129–136.Google Scholar
Harpum, J. R., 1954. “Formation of Epidote in Tanganyika”, Bull. Geol. Soc. Amer., 65, 1075–1092.Google Scholar
Hutton, C. O., 1940. “Metamorphism in the Lake Wakatipu Region, Western Otago, New Zealand”, Geol. Mem. N.Z.Google Scholar
Jakob, J., 1929. “Beitrage zur chemischen Konstitution der Glimmer”, Z. Kristallogr., 69, 511–515.Google Scholar
Johnston, R. W., 1949. “Clinozoisite from Camaderry Mountain, Co. Wicklow”, Min. Mag., 28, 505–515.Google Scholar
Kennedy, W. Q., 1949. “Zones of Progressive Regional Metamorphism in the Moine Schists of the Western Highlands of Scotland”, Geol. Mag., 86, 43–56.Google Scholar
Kennedy, W. Q., 1955. “The Tectonics of the Morar Anticline and the Problem of the North-west Caledonian Front”, Quart. J. Geol. Soc, 110, 357–390.Google Scholar
Lambert, R. St J., 1958. “A Metamorphic Boundary in the Moine Schists of the Morar and Knoydart Districts of Inverness-shire”, Geol. Mag., 95, 177–194.Google Scholar
Love, W. T., 1940. “Certain Biotite Gneisses of the Grenville Series near Kingston, Ontario”, Trans. Roy. Soc. Can., 34 (4), 53–62.Google Scholar
Lyons, J. B., 1955. “Geology of the Hanover Quadrangle, New Hampshire-Vermont”, Bull. Geol. Soc. Amer., 66, 105–146.Google Scholar
Macgregor, A. G., 1948. “Resemblances between Moine and Sub-Moine Metamorphic Sediments in the Western Highlands of Scotland”, Geol. Mag., 85, 265–275.Google Scholar
Macgregor, A. G., 1952. “Metamorphism in the Moine Nappe of Northern Scotland”, Trans. Edin. Geol. Soc., 15, 241–257.Google Scholar
Mackenzie, W. S., 1954. “The Orthoclase-microcline Inversion”, Min. Mag., 30, 354–366.Google Scholar
Michel, R., 1953. “Les schistes cristallins des Massifs du Grand Paradis et de Sesia-Lanzo (Alpes Franco-Italiennes)”, Sciences de la Terre 1, Nos. 3/4, Nancy, 1953.Google Scholar
Miyashiro, A., 1953. “Calcium-poor Garnet in relation to Metamorphism”, Geochim. et Cosmoch. Acta, 4, 179–208.Google Scholar
Nockolds, S. R., 1940. “The Garabal Hill-Glen Fyne Igneous Complex”, Quart. J. Geol. Soc., 96, 451–511.Google Scholar
Nockolds, S. R., and Mitchell, R. L., 1948. “The Geochemistry of Some Caledonian Plutonic Rocks”, Trans. Roy. Soc. Edin., 61, 533–575.Google Scholar
Phillips, F. C., 1930. “Some Mineralogical and Chemical Changes induced by Progressive Metamorphism in the Green Bed Group of the Scottish Dalradian”, Min. Mag., 22, 240–256.Google Scholar
Ramberg, H. S., 1952. The Origin of Metamorphic and Metasomatic Rocks. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Richey, J. E., 1948. “Pre-metamorphism Cleavage in the Moine Schists of Morar, Inverness-shire”, Trans. Edin. Geol. Soc., 14, 200–219.Google Scholar
Richey, J. E., and Kennedy, W. Q., 1939. “The Moine and Sub-Moine Series of Morar, Inverness-shire”, Bull. Geol. Surv. G.B., 2, 26–45.Google Scholar
Rosenquist, I. Th., 1952. “The Metamorphic Facies and the Felspar Minerals”, Univ. Bergen Arb. Naturv. R., No. 4, 108.Google Scholar
Schaller, W. T., 1950. “An Interpretation of the Composition of High-silica Sericites”, Min. Mag., 29, 406–415.Google Scholar
Skinner, B. J., 1956. “Physical Properties of End-members of the Garnet Group”, Amer. Min., 41, 428–436.Google Scholar
Snelling, N. J., 1957. “Notes on the Petrology and Mineralogy of the Barrovian Metamorphic Zones”, Geol. Mag., 94, 297–304.Google Scholar
Spaenhauer, F., 1933. “Die Andalusit- und Disthenvorkommen der Silvretta”, Schweiz. Min. Petrogr. Mitt., 13, 323–345.Google Scholar
Sugi, K., 1931. “On the Metamorphic Facies of the Misaka Series in the Vicinity of Nakagawa, Prov. Sagami”, Jap. J. Geol. Geogr., 9, 87–142.Google Scholar
Tempel, H.-G., 1938. “Der Einfluss der seltenen Erden und einiger anderer Komponenten auf die physikalischoptischen Eigenschaften innerhalb der Epidotgruppe”, Chem. d. Erde, 11, 525–551.Google Scholar
Thompson, J. B., 1955. “The Thermodynamic Basis for the Mineral Facies Concept”, Amer. J. Sci., 253, 65–103.Google Scholar
Tilley, C. E., 1923. “The Petrology of the Metamorphosed Rocks of the Start Area (South Devon)”, Quart. J. Geol. Soc., 79, 172–204.Google Scholar
Tsuboi, S., 1935. “Petrological Notes (1–10)”, Jap. J. Geol. Geogr., 12, 109–113.Google Scholar
Turner, F. J., 1933 a. “The Metamorphic and Intrusive Rocks of Southern Westland”, Trans. Proc N.Z. Inst., 63, 178–284.Google Scholar
Turner, F. J., 1933 b. “The Genesis of Oligoclase in Certain Schists”, Geol. Mag., 70, 529–541.Google Scholar
Turner, F. J., 1935. “Contribution to the Interpretation of Mineral Facies in Metamorphic Rocks”, Amer. J. Sci., 29, 409–421.Google Scholar
Turner, F. J., 1947. “Determination of Plagiociase with the Four-axis Universal Stage”, Amer. Min., 32, 389–410.Google Scholar
Turner, F. J., 1948. “Evolution of the Metamorphic Rocks”, Mem. Geol. Soc. Amer., 30.Google Scholar
Turner, F. J., and Verhoogen, J., 1951. Igneous and Metamorphic Petrology. McGraw-Hill, N.Y.Google Scholar
Vogt, T., 1927. “Sulitelmafeltets geologi og petrografi”, Norg. Geol. Under., No. 121.Google Scholar
Volk, W. G., 1939. “Optical and Chemical Studies of Muscovite”, Amer. Min., 24, 255–266.Google Scholar
Walker, E. E., 1904. “Notes on the Garnet-bearing and Associated Rocks of the Borrowdale Volcanic Series”, Quart. J. Geol. Soc., 60, 70–105.Google Scholar
Winchell, A. N., 1951. Elements of Optical Mineralogy, Vol. II. Wiley, N.Y.Google Scholar
Wiseman, J. D. H., 1934. “The Central and South-west Highlands Epidiorites: a Study in Progressive Metamorphism”, Quart. J. Geol. Soc., 90, 354–417.Google Scholar
Yoder, H. S., 1952. “The MgO-Al2O3-SiO2-H2O System and the Related Metamorphic Rocks”, Amer. J. Sci., Bowen Vol., 569–627.Google Scholar