Hostname: page-component-669899f699-rg895 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-26T03:25:01.345Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

XXI.—The Comparative Myology of the Shoulder Girdle and Pectoral Fin of Fishes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 July 2012

Captain E. W. Shann
Captain E. W. Shann
Affiliation:
Oundle School.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Some months ago it was suggested that I should publish my thesis in its unfinished state. I refrained from doing so at that time, as I was unwilling to allow my work to appear until it was ready for publication. When it became apparent that the war. might continue indefinitely. I decided to publish the thesis in such a form as the exigencies of the case would allow.

Type
Research Article
Information
Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of The Royal Society of Edinburgh , Volume 52 , Issue 3 , September 1920 , pp. 531 - 570
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1920

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Literature

(1)Agar, W. E., “The Development of the Anterior Mesoderm, and Paired Fins, with their Nerves in Lepidosiren and Protopterus”, Trans. Roy. Soc. Edin., vol. xlv, 1907, pp. 611–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2)Anthony, R., “Adaptation à la vie arboricole chez les Vertébrés”, Ann. des Sci. Nat. (Zool.), xv, 2–6, 1912.Google Scholar
(3)Allis, E. P., “The Skull, and the Cranial and First Spinal Muscles and Nerves, in Scomber Scomber”, J. Morph., v, 1903, pp. 45–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(4)Balfour, F. M., “On the Development of the Skeleton of the Paired Fins of Elasmobranchs”, Proc. Zool. Soc. London, 1881.Google Scholar
(5)Balfour, F. M., and Parker, W. H., “On the Structure and Development of Lepidosteus”, Phil. Trans., 1882.Google Scholar
(6)Bolk, L., “Beziehungen zwischen Skelet, Muskulatur u. Nerven d. Extremitäten, dargelegt am Heckengürtel, an dessen Musk. sowie am Plexus lumbosacralis”, Morph. Jahrb., xxi, Leipzig, 1894.Google Scholar
(7)Bolk, L., “Rekonst. der Segmentierung d. Gliedmassenmuskulatur, dargelegt an den Musk. des Oberschenkels u. des Schultergürtels”, op. cit., xxii, 1895.Google Scholar
(8)Bolk, L., “Die Sklerogonie des Humerus, zugleich ein Beitrag zur Bildungsgeschichte dieses Skeletteiles”, op. cit., xxii.Google Scholar
(9)Braus, H., “Innerv. paar. Extremit, bei Selaeh”., Jena. Zeit. f. Naturw., xxix, 1895, and xxxi, 1898.Google Scholar
(10)Braus, H., “Extremitätenskelettes”, Haecktljest. Denkschr., Med.-Nat. Ges., Jena, 1904.Google Scholar
(11)Braus, H., “Die Musk. u. Nerv. der Ceratodusflosse”, Zool. Forsch., op. cit., 1901.Google Scholar
(12)Braus, H., “Extremit. u. d. Ex.-skelettes”, Hertwig's Handb. Wirbelt., 1904.Google Scholar
(13)Braus, H., “Ueber neue Funde versteinertes Gliedmassenknorpel u. Musk. von Seiach”., Verh. d. Phys.-Med. Ges., Würzburg, xxxiv, 1901.Google Scholar
(14)Braus, H., “Die Nervengeflechte d. Haie u. Kochen”, Jena. Zeit., xlvii, 1911.Google Scholar
(15)Bruch, C., Osteol. des liheinlachses, 2te Ausg., Mainz, 1875.Google Scholar
(16)Budgett, J. S., “On the Structure of Larval Polypterus”, Trans. Zool. Soc., xvi, p. 315, 1902.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(17)Buist, T. P., “Development of the Pectoral Girdle in the Pipe-fish (Syngnathus acus)”, Ann. and Mag. Nat. Hist., Dec. 1912.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(18)Cope, E. D., “The Homologies of the Fins of Fishes”, Amer. Nat., 1890, p. 418.Google Scholar
(19)Corning, H. K., “Ueber d. vent. Urwirbelkiwspen in der Brustflosse d. Teleostier”, Morph. Jahrb., xxii, Leipzig, 1895.Google Scholar
(20)Davidoff, V. M., “Hint. Gliedmasse der Fische”, op. cit., 1879, 1880, 1883.Google Scholar
(21)Dean, B., “Historical Evidence of the Origin of the Paired Limbs of Vertebrates”, Amer. Nat., 1902.Google Scholar
(22)Dean, B., “The Fin-fold Origin of Paired Limbs, Ptychopterygia of Palaeozoic Sharks”, Anat. Ana., xi, 1896.Google Scholar
(23)Dean, B., “Biometrical Evidence in the Problem of the Paired Limbs”, Amer. Nat., No. 431, 1902.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(24)Dean, B., “Chimæroid Fishes”, Carnegie Inst., Washington, 1906.Google Scholar
(25)Derjugin, K., “Die Entwickelung der Brustflossen und des Schultergürtels bei Exocætus volitans”, Zeit. Wiss. Zool., xci, 1908.Google Scholar
(26)Derjugin, K., “Der Bau u. d. Entw. des Schultergürtels u. d. Brustflossen bei den Teleostiern”, op. cit., xci, 1909-1910.Google Scholar
(27)Dietz, P. A., Vergleichende Anat. van de Kaak- en Kieutv-boogspieren der Teleostei, Leiden, 1912.Google Scholar
(28)Dohrn, A., “Studien Wirbelthierkörpers : VI. Die paar. u. unpaar. Flossen der Selachier”, Mitth. Zool. Stas. Neap., v, 1884.Google Scholar
(29)Druner, L., “Ueber d. Musk. des Visceralskelettes d. Urodelen”, Anat. Anz., xxiii, pp. 545–71, 1903.Google Scholar
(30)Ducret, E., Cont. à l'étude du Dével. des Memb. pairs et impairs des Poistons téléost., Lausanne, 1894.Google Scholar
(31)Furbringer, M., “Zur vergi. Anat. d. Schultermuskeln”, Jena. Zeit., 1873, p. 237.Google Scholar
(32)Furbringer, M., op. cit., 1874, p. 175.Google Scholar
(33)Furbringer, M., “Ueber d. mit dem Viseeralskelet verbund, spinal. Muskeln bei Selachiern”, op. cit., 1895.Google Scholar
(34)Gegenbaur, C., “Zur Gliedmassenfrage”, Morph. Jahrb., v, 1879.Google Scholar
(35)Gegenbaur, C., “Das Flossenskelett der Crossopt. u. das Arehip tery gram der Fische”, op. cit., xxii, 1895.Google Scholar
(36)Gegenbaur, C., “Clavicula u. Cleithrum”, op. cit., xxiii, 1895.Google Scholar
(37)Gegenbaur, C., “Ueber das Skelett der Gliedmassen der Wirbelthiere im allgem. u. d Hinterglied-niassen d. Selachier insbesondere”, Jena. Zeit., v, 1870.Google Scholar
(38)Goodrich, E. S., “Notes on the Development, Structure, and Origin of Median and Paired Fins of Fishes”, Q.J.M.S., June 1906.Google Scholar
(39)Goodrich, E. S., “Metamerie Segmentation and Homology”, op. cit., lix, pt. 2, 1913.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(40)Guitel, F., “Dével. des nageoires prs. du Cyclopterus lumpus”, Arch. Zool. exp. et. génér., vol. iv, 3me sér., 1896.Google Scholar
(41)Haller, B., “Ueber d. Schultergürtel der Teleostier”, Arch. Mikr. Anat., lxvii, 1905.Google Scholar
(42)Hamburger, R., “Ueber d. paarigen Extremitäten von Squalius, Trigla, Periophthalmus u. Lophius”, Rev. Suisse de Zool., xii, 1904.Google Scholar
(43)Harrison, K. G., “Unpaar. u. paar. Flossen d. Teleost”., Arch. Mikr. Anat., 1895.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(44)Hartmann, R., “Ueber d. Brustflossenmuskeln einiger Fische”, Sitzungsber. Oes. Nat. Fr. Berlin, No. 9, 1881, pp. 150–154.Google Scholar
(45)Haswell, W. A., “On the Structure of the Paired Fins of Ceratodus, with Remarks on the General Theory of the Vertebrate Limb”, Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S.W., vii, 1883.Google Scholar
(46)Haswell, W. A., “Studies on the Elasmobranch Skeleton”, op. cit., ix, 1884.Google Scholar
(47)Hill, J. P., “A Fiddler (Trygonorhina fasciata) with Abnormal Pectoral Fins”, op. cit., x, 2nd ser., 1895.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(48)Howes, G. B., “On the Skeleton and Affinities of the Paired Fins of Ceratodus, with Observations upon those of the Elasmobranchii”, P.Z.S., 1887.Google Scholar
(49)Howes, G. B., “Observations on the Pectoral Fin Skeleton of the living Batoid Fishes and of the extinct genus Squalo raja, with especial reference to the affinities of the same”, op. cit., 1890.Google Scholar
(50)Humphry, G. M., “On the Homological Relations to one another of the Mesial and Lateral Fins of Osseous Fishes”, J. Anat. and Phys., v, 1871.Google Scholar
(51)Humphry, G. M., “The Muscles of the Smooth Dog-fish (Mustelus levis)”, op. cit., vi, 1872.Google Scholar
(52)Humphry, G. M., “The Muscles of Ceratodus”, op. cit., vi, 1872.Google Scholar
(53)Huxley, T. H., “On Some Parts of the Skeleton of Fishes”, A.J.M.S., 1859.Google Scholar
(54)Huxley, T. H., and Hawkins, , Atlas of Comparative Osteology, 1864.Google Scholar
(55)Jaquet, M., “Contr, à l'anatomie comp. des syst. squelet. et musc. (Chimæra, Callorhynchus, Spinax, Protopterus, Ceratodius, Axolotl)”, Arch. Sci. Méd. Bucharest, ii, iii, iv.Google Scholar
(56)Jungersen, H. F. E., “Structure of Amphisile and Centriscus”, Mém. Aead. Roy. des Sei. Zstt. de Danemark, Copenhagen, ser. 7, Sc. Section, vi, No. 2.Google Scholar
(57)Kerr, J. G., “The Embryology of certain of the Lower Fishes, and its bearing upon Vertebrate Morphology”, Proc. Roy. Phys. Soc. Edinburgh, xvi, No. 5, 1906.Google Scholar
(58)Klaatsch, H., “Die Brustflosse der Crossopterygier, etc”., Festselu: Carl Gegenbaur, Leipzig, 1896.Google Scholar
(59)Luther, A., “Beiträge zur Kenntniss von Muskulatur u. Skelett des Kopfes des Haies u. d. Holocephalen”, Acta Soc. Sc. Fenn., xxxvii, No. 6, 1909.Google Scholar
(60)M'Murrich, J. P., “The Osteology of Amiurus catus”, Proc. Canad. Inst., ii, No. 3, 1884.Google Scholar
(61)Marey, M., “Des mouvements de natation de la Raie”, Oompt. Rend. Acad. Sa., cxvi, Paris, 1893.Google Scholar
(62)Marion, G. E., “Mandib. and Phar. Muscles of Acantinas and Kaja”, Contr. Biol. Lab., Tuft's Coll., No. 43.Google Scholar
(63)Meissner, Von W., “Neue Beit, zur vergleich. Anat. des Schultergürtels der Accipenseriden”, Zool. Am., xxxii, 1907-1908, p. 465.Google Scholar
(64)Mivart, St G., “Fins of Elasmobranchs, etc”., T.Z.S., London, x, 1879.Google Scholar
(65)Mollier, S., “Paar. Extrem. Wirb. : I, Das Ichthyopterygium”, Anat. Hefte, i, 1893.Google Scholar
(66)Mollier, S., II, “Das Cheiropterygium”, op. cit., v, 1895.Google Scholar
(67)Mollier, S., III, “Die Entw. der paar. Floss, des Störs”, 1909, op. cit., viii, 1898.Google Scholar
(68)Mueller, E., “Die Brustflosse der Solachier”, op. cit., xxxix, 1909, p. 118.Google Scholar
(69)Mueller, E., “Untersuch, ü. d. Music, u. Nerv. der Brustflosse u. d. Körperwand bei Acantinas vulgáris”, op. cit., xliii, 1911, p. 129.Google Scholar
(70)Osburn, R. C., “New Evidence from Primitive Sharks on the Origin of the Limbs of Vertebrates”, Science, N.S., xxv, 1907.Google Scholar
(71)Osburn, R. C., “The Origin of Vertebrate Limbs : Recent Evidence upon the Problem from Studies on Primitive Sharks”, Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sc., xvii, 1907, pp. 415–436.Google Scholar
(72)Osburn, R. C., “Observations on the Paired Limbs of Vertebrates”, Amer. J. Anat., vii, 1907, pp. 171–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(73)Owen, R., Anatomy of Vertebrates, vol. i.Google Scholar
(74)Parker, W. K., “Monograph on Shoulder Girdle and Sternum”, Ray Soc., 1868.Google Scholar
(75)Rautenfeld, Von E., “Morph. Untersuch, ü. d. Skelett d. Gliedmassen v. Ganoiden u. Teleostiern”, Inaug. Diss. Dorpat, 1882.Google Scholar
(76)Rennie, J., “Accessory Fins in Raia batis’, Anat. Am., xxviii, 1906.Google Scholar
(77)Ruge, E., “Vord. Extrem, von Spiiiax”, Morph. Jahrb., xxx, 1902.Google Scholar
(78)Ryder, J. A., “Evolution of the Fins of Fishes”, Rep. Comrn. Fish and Fisheries, Washington, 1886.Google Scholar
(79)Semon, R., “Paar. Floss. Ceratodus”, Zool. Forsch. u. Jena. Denk., 1898.Google Scholar
(80)Siebenrock, F., “Ueber die Verbindungsweise des Schultergürtels mit den Schädel bei den Teleosteern”, Ann. K. K. Nat. Hofmuseums, Wien, xvi, 1901.Google Scholar
(81)Starks, E. C., “The Shoulder Girdle and Characteristic Osteology of the Hemibranchiate Fishes”, Proc. U.S. Mus., xxv, 1902, p. 619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(82)Swinnerton, H. H., “A Contribution to the Morphology and Development of the Pectoral Skeleton of Teleosteans”, Q.J.M.S., xlix, pt. ii, 1905.Google Scholar
(83)Swinnerton, H. H., “Evolution of the Structure and Formation of the Fin in Fishes”, Sc. Progress, No. 19, Jan. 1911.Google Scholar
(84)Swirski, G., “Untersuch, ü. d. Entw. des Schultergürtels u. d. Skelets der Brustflosse des Hechts”, Inaug. Diss. Dorpat, 1880.Google Scholar
(85)Taylor, M., “The Development of Symbranchus inarm”., Q.J.M.S., 1913.Google Scholar
(86)Thacher, J. K., “Median and Paired Fins”, Trans. Connect. Acad., 1877.Google Scholar
(87)Tiesing, B., “Ein Beitrag zur Kenntniss der Augen-, Kiefer- u. Kiemenmuskeln der Haie u. Rochen”, Jena. Zeit., xxx, 1895.Google Scholar
(88)Vetter, B., “Verg. Anat. der Kiemen- u. Kiefermuskulatur der Fische”, op. cit., viii, xii, N.F. i.Google Scholar
(89)Wiedersheim, R., Das Gliedmassenskelet der Wirbelthiere, Jena, 1892.Google Scholar
(90)Wiedersheim, R., “Ueber d. Entw. des Schulter- u. Beckengürtels”, Anat. Anz., iv, p. 428, 1889; v, p. 13, 1890.Google Scholar
(91)Wiedersheim, R., “Das Skelet … Lepidosiren annectens”, Morph. Stud. Jena, i, 1880.Google Scholar
(92)Williamson, H. C., “On the Anatomy of the Pectoral Arch of the Grey Gurnard”, S.F.B., xii, pt. iii, p. 322.Google Scholar
(93)Woodward, A. S., “The Evolution of Fins”, Nat. Sci., 1892.Google Scholar