Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T07:03:51.342Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

XII.—The Blind Seed Disease of Rye-Grass and its Causal Fungus

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 July 2012

Malcolm Wilson ,
Mary Noble  and
Elizabeth G. Gray
Malcolm Wilson
Affiliation:
Reader in Mycology, University of Edinburgh
Mary Noble
Affiliation:
Assistant to Plant Pathologist, Plant Pathology Service, Department of Agriculture for Scotland
Elizabeth G. Gray
Affiliation:
Advisory Mycologist, North of Scotland College of Agriculture.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The presence of a fungus on grains of perennial rye-grass which failed to germinate was recorded in New Zealand by Hyde in 1932. In 1938 the same fungus was associated by Hyde with exceptionally low germination in Italian rye-grass and, later that year (Hyde, 1938 a), the poor germinating capacity was ascribed to infection by Pullularia. Seed of the Scottish harvest of 1938 showed the signs of infection by Pullularia described in Hyde's papers (Noble, 1939), and cultures obtained from mycelium within infected seed, sterilised on the surface, were identified as Pullularia pullulans (De Bary) Berk.

Type
Research Article
Information
Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of The Royal Society of Edinburgh , Volume 61 , Issue 2 , 1947 , pp. 327 - 340
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1947

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References to Literature

Anon, 1930. Seed Testing and Plant Registration Station for Scotland, Biennial Report, 1927–1929, pp. 1–34.Google Scholar
Chaze, J., 1937. “Les Graminées toxiques et en particulier l'ivraie enivrante,” Ann. Sci. nat. Bot., 10 ser., XIX, 43–59.Google Scholar
Dick, W., 1859. “Stomach or Grass Staggers,” Trans. Highl. Agric. Soc. Scot., 3 ser., VIII, 468–478.Google Scholar
Freeman, E. M., 1903. “The Seed Fungus of Lolium temulentum L., the Darnel,” Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. Lond., Ser. B, CXEVI, 1–27.Google Scholar
Gemmell, A. R., 1940. “The Disease of Ryegrass seed attributed to Pullularla pullulans,” W. Scotland Agric. Coll. Bull., 136, 1–16.Google Scholar
Glasscock, H. H., 1940. “Blind Seed Disease of Rye-Grass,” Nature, no. CXLVI, 368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gorman, L. W., 1939. “Low Germination susceptibility of perennial rye-grass Strains,” N.Z. Journ. Sci. Tech., XX, 329A–401A.Google Scholar
Gray, E. G., 1942. “Phialea mucosa sp. nov., The Blind-Seed fungus,” Trans. Brit. Myc. Soc., XXV, 329–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gregob, J. W., 1927. “Pollination and Seed Production in the Rye-Grasses (Lolium perenne and Lolium italicum),” Trans. Roy. Soc. Edin., LV, 773–794.Google Scholar
Guébin, P., 1899. “The probable causes of the poisonous effects of the darnel (Lolium temulentum L.),” Bot. Gaz., XXVIII, 136–137.Google Scholar
Guyot, L., 1928. “Parasitisme et toxicité (Ivraie enivrante et Siegle enivrant),” La Nature, no. 2781, 263–264.Google Scholar
Hanausek, T. F., 1898. “Vorlaufige Mittheilung über den von A. Vogl in der Frucht von Lolium temulentum entdeckten Pilz,” Ber. dtsch. bot. Ges., XVI, 203–207.Google Scholar
Hannig, E., 1907. “Über pilzfreies Lolium temulentum,” Bot. Zeit., LXV, 25–38.Google Scholar
Hansen, H. N., 1938. “The dual phenomenon in imperfect fungi,” Mycologia, XXX, 442–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hyde, E. O. C., 1932. “Germinating capacity of perennial rye-grass seed,” N.Z. Journ. Agrie., XLIV, 316–319.Google Scholar
Hyde, E. O. C., 1938. “Germinating capacity of Italian rye-grass seed,” N.Z. Journ. Agrie, LVI, p 357.Google Scholar
Hyde, E. O. C., 1938 a. “Detecting Pullularla infection in rye-grass crop,” N.Z. Journ. Agrie., LVII, 301–302.Google Scholar
Long, H. C., 1917. Plants poisonous to Live Stock, Cambridge.Google Scholar
McLennan, E., 1920. “The endophytic fungus of Lolium. I,” Proc. Roy. Soc. Viet., XXXII, N.S., 252–301.Google Scholar
Molennan, E., 1926. “The endophytic fungus of Lolium. II. The Mycorrhiza on the roots of Lolium temulentum,” Ann. Bot., XL, 43–68.Google Scholar
Maire, R., et Werner, R. G., 1937. “Fungi Maroccani, Mem. Soc. Sci. Nat. Maroc., no. XLV, 1–147.Google Scholar
Melville, J., and Grimmett, R., 1941. “Isolations of a new Alkaloid from Perennial Rye Grass,” Nature, no. 3765, 782.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mercer, S. P., and Linehan, P. A., 1931. “Experiments in the Diagnosis of Species and Varieties of Lolium by the Gentner Screened Ultra-Violet Light Method,” Proc. Intern. Seed Testing Assoc., no. 18, 180–191.Google Scholar
Mullins, J., 1941. “‘Staggers’ in Animals,” N.Z. Journ. Agrie., 62, 169.Google Scholar
Muskett, E. A., and Calvert, N. L., 1940. “Blind Seed Disease of Rye-Grass,” Nature, no. CXLVI, 200–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neill, J. C., 1940. “The endophyte of Rye-Grass (Lolium perenne),” N.Z. Journ. Sci. Tech., XXI, 280A–291A.Google Scholar
Neill, J. C., 1942. “The Endophytes of Lolium and Festuca,” N.Z. Journ. Sci. Tech., XXIII, 185A–193A, 1941.Google Scholar
Neill, J. C., and Hyde, E. O. C., 1939. “Blind Seed Disease of Rye-Grass,” N.Z. Journ. Sci. Tech., XX, 281A–301A.Google Scholar
Nestler, A., 1904. “Zur Kenntnis der Symbiose eines Pilzes mit dem Taumelloch,” S. B. Akad. Wiss. Wien, Math-Nat., CXIII, 529–546.Google Scholar
Noble, M., 1939. “Notes on Pullularia pullulans in Rye-Grass seed,” Ann. Appl. Biol., XXVI, 630–633.Google Scholar
Percival, J., 1921. The Wheat Plant, London.Google Scholar
Prillieux, E., 1891. “Le seigle enivrant,” Bull. Soc. Bot. France, XXXVIII, 205–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prillieux, E., 1897. Maladies des Plantes Agricoles, II, Paris.Google Scholar
Prillieux, E., and Delacroix, G., 1892. “Phialea temulenta nov. sp. Prill, et Delacr., état ascospore d'Endoconidium temulentum, champignon donnant au seigle des propriétés vénéneuses,” Bull. Soc. Myc. France, VIII, 22–23.Google Scholar
Prillieux, E., and Delacroix, G., 1891. “Endoconidium temulentum, nov. gen. nov. sp. Prill, et Delacr. Champignon donnant au seigle les propriétés vénéneuses,” Bull. Soc. Myc. France, VII, 116–117.Google Scholar
Saccardo, P. A., 1906. Sylloge Fungorum, XVIII, Patavii.Google Scholar
Sampson, K., 1935. “The Presence and Absence of an Endophytic Fungus in Lolium temulentum and L. perenne,” Trans. Brit. Myc. Soc., XIX, 337–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sampson, K., 1937. “Further observations on the Systemic Infection of Lolium,” Trans. Brit. Myc. Soc., XXI, 84–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sampson, K., 1939. “Additional Notes on the Systemic Infection of Lolium,” Trans. Brit. Myc. Soc., XXIII, 316–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, M., Noble, M., and Gray, E. G., 1940 a. “Blind Seed Disease of Rye-Grass,” Nature, no. CXLVI, 492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, M., Noble, M., and Gray, E. G., 1940 b. “Blind Seed Disease of Rye-Grass,” Nature, no. CXLVI, 492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar