Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T17:01:48.420Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

XIII.—The Formation, Rupture, and Closure of Ovarian Follicles in Ferrets and Ferret-Polecat Hybrids, and some Associated Phenomena.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 July 2012

Arthur Robinson
Arthur Robinson
Affiliation:
University of Edinburgh.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

A few words of explanation are necessary at the outset in connection with the terms used in association with the animals upon which these investigations were made.

Dealers in ferrets supply two types of animals—one with yellowish-white fur and pink eyes, which they call “ferrets,” and a second type in which the yellowish fur is intermingled with a varying admixture of brownish or brown-black hairs; the second type they call “polecats.” The polecats of the ferret-dealers are not, however, true polecats, for Miss Frances Pitt, who has bred ferrets and polecats and ferret-polecat hybrids in a scientific manner, and to whom I am indebted for the greater and best part of my information on this subject, points out that the so-called polecat of the dealers is never so dark and handsome in colour as the true polecat. Moreover, as Miss Pitt states, in the true polecat the light marks in front of the ears do not usually join across the forehead, whereas in the polecat of the dealers they form a band across the face; further, when viewed from in front and above, the head of the true polecat has the form of a fairly equilateral triangle, whilst in ferrets and the so-called polecats of the dealers the head, on the whole, has the form of an isosceles triangle.

Type
Research Article
Information
Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of The Royal Society of Edinburgh , Volume 52 , Issue 2 , 1919 , pp. 303 - 363
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1919

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

List of Literature

(1)Alexando, N., “Contribution à l'histologie normale et pathologique des ovaries de la femme,” Ann. de Gynécologie, 1891.Google Scholar
(2)Beard, J., The Span of Gestation, Jena, 1897.Google Scholar
(3)Benckiser, A., “Zur Entwicklungsgeschichte des Corpus luteum,” Archiv für Gynäkologie, Bd. xxiii.Google Scholar
(4)Bouin, P., et Ancel, P., “Sur la différenciation d'une membrane propre d'origine épithéliale pendant le développement du corps jaune chez le ch ienne,” C. R. de la Soc. Biol., t. lxv, 1908.Google Scholar
(5)Bouin, P., et Angel, P., “Sur les homologies et la signification des glandes à sécretion interne de l'ovaire,” C.R. Soc. Biol. Paris, t. lxvii, 1909.Google Scholar
(6)Craig, W., “Oviposition induced by the Male in Pigeons.” Journ. of Morph., vol. xxii, 1901.Google Scholar
(7)Frankel, L., “Vergleichend histologische Untersuchungen über des Vorkommen drüsiger Formationen im interstitiellen Eierstocks gewebe,” Archiv für Gynäkologie, Bd. lxxv, 1905.Google Scholar
(8)Heape, W., “The Menstruation of Semnopitlhecus entellus,” Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc., vol. B, 1894.Google Scholar
(9)Heape, W., “The Menstruation and Ovulation of Macacus rhesus,” Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc., vol. B, 188, 1897.Google Scholar
(10)Heape, W., “The Menstruation and Ovulation of Monkeys and the Human Female,” Obstetrics Trans., vol. xi, 1898.Google Scholar
(11)Heape, W., “Ovulation and Degeneration of Ova in the Rabbit,” Proc. of Roy. Soc., vol. B 76, 1905.Google Scholar
(12)Hill, J. P., and O'Donoghue, C. H., “The Reproductive Cycle in the Marsupial Dasyurus viverrinus,” Q.J.M.S., vol. lix, 1914.Google Scholar
(13)Honoré, C., “Recherches sur l'ovaire du Lapin,” Archiv de Biol., t. xvi, 1899–1900.Google Scholar
(14)Janosik, J., “Zur Histologie des Ovariums,” Sitz. d. Kais. Akad. d. Wiss.: Mathem. Naturw. Kl., 95–96 Bd., 1887.Google Scholar
(15)Kingery, H. M., “Oogenesis in the White Mouse,” Journ. of Morph., vol. xxx, No. 1, 1917.Google Scholar
(16)Lane-Claypon, J. E., “On Ovogenesis and the Formation of the Interstitial Cells of the Ovary,” Journ. of Obstetrics and Gynæcology, vol. xi, 1907.Google Scholar
(17)Leopold, L. U., and Raveno, A., “Neuer Beitrag zur Lehre von der Menstruation und Ovulation,” Archiv für Gynäk., Bd. lxxxiii, 1907.Google Scholar
(18)Limon, M., “Sur l'évolution de la membrane propre des ovisacs au cours de leur atrésie,” Bibl. Anat. Paris, Nancy, t. xiii, 1904.Google Scholar
(19)Loeb, L., “Der normale und pathologische Zyklus im Ovarium des säugetier,” Virchow's Archiv, Bd. xx, 1911.Google Scholar
(19A)Loeb, L., “The Cyclic Changes in the Ovary of Guinea-pig,” Journ. of Morph., vol. xxii, 1911.Google Scholar
(20)Longley, W. H., “The Maturation of the Egg and Ovulation in the Domestic Cat,” American Journ. Anat., vol. xii, 1911–1912.Google Scholar
(21)Marshall, F. H. A., “The Œistrus Cycle in the Common Ferret,” Q.J.M.S., vol. xlviii, 1904.Google Scholar
(22)Marshall, F. H. A., The Physiology of Reproduction, London, 1910.Google Scholar
(23)Marshall, F. H. A., “On the Ovarian Factor concerned in the Recurrence of Œstrus,” Proc. of the Phy. Soc. Jour. of Phys., vol. xliii, 1911–1912.Google Scholar
(24)Marshall, F. H. A., “The Œstrus Cycle and the Formation of the Corpus luteum of the Sheep,” Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc., vol. B 196, 1904.Google Scholar
(25)Marshall, F. H. A., and Jolly, W. A., “The Œstrus Cycle in the Dog,” Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc., vol. B 198, 1906.Google Scholar
(25A)Marshall, F. H. A., “The Functional Correlation between the Ovaries, Uterus, and Mammary Glands in the Rabbit; with Observations on the Œstrus Cycle,” Proc. Roy. Soc., vol. B 87, 1914.Google Scholar
(26)Miller, G. S., “Catalogue of Mammals of Western Europe, p. 423, London, 1913.Google Scholar
(27)Monterosso, B., “Sur la struttura e la funzione della cellule parietali della granulosa nel follicolo ovarico del Maiale,” Atti della Accad. Gioenia di Sc. Nat. Catania, vol. v, 1912.Google Scholar
(28)Nagel, W., “Das Menschlich Ei,” Archiv f. mikr. Anat., Bd. xxxi, 1888.Google Scholar
(29)O'Donoghue, C. H., “On the Corpora lutea, and the Interstitial Tissue of the Ovary in Marsupialia,” Q.J.M.S., vol. lxi, 1916.Google Scholar
(30)Paton, D. Noël, Regulation of Metabolism, London, 1913.Google Scholar
(31)Raveno, A., “Ueber die Frage nach der Thätigkeit des Eierstocks in der Sehwangerschaft,” Arch. f. Gynäk., Bd. lxxxiii, 1907.Google Scholar
(32)Robinson, Arthur, “The Position and Peritoneal Relations of the Mammalian Ovary,” Jour. of Anat. and Phys., vol. xxi, 1887.Google Scholar
(33)Rubaschkin, W., “Zum Lehre von der Keimbahn bei Säugetieren,” Anat. Hefte, Bd. xlvi, 1912.Google Scholar
(34)Russo, A., “Sulla cromolisi delle cellule della granulosa durante il digiuno e sul suo significato nella differenaiazione sessuale delle ova dei mammiferi,” Atti della Accad. Gioenia di Se. Nat. in Catania, vol. ii, 1909.Google Scholar
(35)Sandes, F.P., “The Corpus luteum of Dasyurus viverrinus; with Observations on the Growth and Atrophy of Graafian Follicles,” Proc. of the Linnean Soc. of New South Wales, 1903.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(36)Schottländer, J., “Ueber den Graaf'schen Follikel seine Entstehung beim Menschen und seine Sebicksale bei Menschen und Säugethieren,” Arch. f. mikr. Anat., Bd. xli, 1893.Google Scholar
(37)Seitz, L., “Die Follikelatresie während der Sehwangerschaft,” Arch. f. Gynäk., Bd. lxxvii, 1905–1906.Google Scholar
(38)Van Beneden, E., “Contribution à la connaissance de l'ovaire des mammifères,” Arch. de Biol., t. i, 1880.Google Scholar
(39)Van Der Stricht, O., “La ponte ovarique et l'histogénèse du corps jaune,” Bull. de l'Acad. Roy. de Belgique, 1901.Google Scholar
(39A)Van Der Stricht, O., “Sur le processus de l'excrétion des glandes endocrines. Le corps jaune et la glande interstitielle de l'ovaire,” Arch. de Biol., t. xxvii, 1912.Google Scholar
(40)Van Der Stricht, R., “Vitellogénèse dans l'ovule de Chatte,” Arch. de Biol., t. xxvii, 1912.Google Scholar
(41)Wagener, G., “Bemerkungen über den Eierstock und des gelben Körper,” Arch. f. Anat. u. Physiol., 1879.Google Scholar
(42)Waldeyer, , Eierstock und Ei, Leipzig, 1870.Google Scholar
(43)Winiwarter, H. Von, et Sainmont, G., Nouvelles recherches sur l'ovogénèse de l'ovaire des mammifères, (chat), Liége, 1912.Google Scholar