Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T12:59:39.079Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A successful stress-forecast: an addendum to ‘Stress-forecasting: a viable alternative to earthquake prediction in a dynamic Earth’

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 November 2011

Stuart Crampin
Stuart Crampin
Affiliation:
Department of Geology and Geophysics, University of Edinburgh, Grant Institute, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JW, Scotland, U.K. e-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In a recent issue of this journal, Crampin (1998) suggested that analysing seismic shear-wave splitting along appropriate ray paths can be used to monitor the build-up of stress before earthquakes. If the source and recording geometry are suitable, this procedure, known as stress-forecasting, allows the approximate time and magnitude, but not the location, of future large earthquakes to be estimated.

Keywords

forecasting earthquakesfracture criticalityshear-wave splittingstress-monitoring sites.
Type
Research Article
Information
Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of The Royal Society of Edinburgh , Volume 89 , Issue 4 , 1998 , pp. 231
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Crampin, S. 1998. Stress-forecasting: a viable alternative to earthquake prediction in a dynamic Earth. Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh: Earth Sciences 89, 121-33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crampin, S. 1999. Techniques for stress-forecasting time and magnitude of large earthquakes in stress-monitoring sites, Patent Application 9906893. 4, 26 March 1999.Google Scholar
Crampin, S., Volti, T. & Stefánsson, R. 1999. A successfully stressforecast earthquake. Geophysical Journal International 138, F1–F5.Google Scholar
Stefansson, R., Bödvarsson, R., Slunga, R., Einarsson, P., Jakobsdottir, S., Bungum, H., Gregerson, S., Havskov, J., Hjelme, J. & Korhonen, H. 1993. Earthquake prediction research in the South Iceland seismic zone and the SIL Project. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 83, 696–716.Google Scholar