Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T04:26:21.977Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Physiological constraints on living and fossil brachiopods

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 November 2011

Gordon B. Curry ,
A. D. Ansell ,
M. James  and
L. Peck
Gordon B. Curry
Affiliation:
Department of Geology and Applied Geology, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, Scotland
A. D. Ansell
Affiliation:
Dunstaffnage Marine Research Laboratory, P.O. Box 3, Oban PA34 4AD, Scotland
M. James
Affiliation:
Department of Geology and Applied Geology, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, Scotland
L. Peck
Affiliation:
British Antarctic Survey (NERC), High Cross, Madingley Road, Cambridge CB3 0ET, England
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Ash-free-dry-weight determinations for a representative range of living brachiopod genera have revealed that a consistently high proportion of total organic mass is contained within the shell, partly as the organic matrix for biomineralisation and partly as minute extensions of the mantle tissues (caeca) housed within hollow endopunctae permeating the shell. On average 40% to 50% of the total organic mass of both articulate and inarticulate brachiopods is situated within the shell. This is true even for a rhynchonellid brachiopod which does not possess endopunctae, but which has a more dense protein matrix in its shell. The effectively hidden constituent of brachiopod tissue mass which is included in this component has often been overlooked, and as a result total metabolic tissue mass has been underestimated. This throws into question some previous interpretations of brachiopod respiratory and metabolic data.

The oxygen consumption rates of several living brachiopods have been measured, and when respiring tissue in caeca in the shell is taken into consideration, it is clear that brachiopod metabolic rates are low when compared with other marine invertebrates (e.g. between 10% and 50% of the oxygen uptake of comparable gastropods and bivalve molluscs held in similar conditions). This low rate cannot be attributed to a slower pumping rate by the brachiopod lophophore, as has been suggested, because the rate of water movement is comparable to that across the bivalve gill.

Nitrogen excretion rates have also been measured for a few living brachiopods, allowing a comparison with rates of oxygen consumption and providing an indication of the metabolic substrates used. These data on oxygen: nitrogen ratios suggest that one Antarctic brachiopod utilises exclusively protein as a metabolic substrate, while a temperate latitude species uses mainly protein during winter but lipids and carbohydrates during summer months. Histological observations, particularly of Terebratulina retusa from temperate waters, show that a specialised tissue layer in the brachiopod outer mantle epithelium proximal to the shell may be the site of storage of the protein that is metabolised during winter, and of carbohydrate mobilised during gonadal development in summer. The caeca have also been suggested as sites of storage of metabolites, and the possible relationships between these areas of mantle are discussed. It seems that the ability to store nutrients in the mantle, combined with flexibility of substrate utilisation and an inherently low metabolic rate, have been important factors in brachiopod evolution.

Keywords

caecametabolismorganic massoxygen: nitrogen ratiooxygen uptakeshell organicsstorage
Type
Physiological adaptations in some recent and fossil organisms
Information
Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of The Royal Society of Edinburgh , Volume 80 , Issue 3-4: Environments and Physiology of Fossil Organisms , 1989 , pp. 255 - 262
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bayne, B. L., Widdows, J. & Thompson, R. J. 1976. Physiological integrations. In Bayne, B. L. (ed.) Marine mussels: their ecology and physiology, 261–292. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Blacknell, W. M. & Ansell, A. D. 1974. The direct development of the bivalve Thyasira gouldi (Phillipi). THALASSIA JUGOSLAVICA 10, 23–43.Google Scholar
Burton, C. J. & Curry, G. B. 1985. Pelagic brachiopods from the Upper Devonian of East Cornwall. PROC USSHER SOC 6, 191–195.Google Scholar
Collins, M. J. 1986. Post mortality strength loss in shells of the Recent articulate brachiopod Terebratulina retusa (L.) from the west coast of Scotland. In Emig, C. C. & Racheboeuf, P. R. (eds) Proc 1st International Congress Brachiopods, Brest, France. BIOSTRAT PALEOZ 5, 209–218.Google Scholar
Collins, M. J., Curry, G. B., Muyzer, G., Westbroek, P., Zomerdijk, T. & Quinn, R. 1988. Serotaxonomy of skeletal macromolecules in living terebratulid brachiopods. HIST BIOL 1, 207–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conover, R. J. & Corner, E. D. S. 1968. Respiratation and nitrogen excretion by some marine zooplankton in relation to their life cycle. J MAR BIOL ASSOC UK 48, 49–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curry, G. B. 1982. Ecology and Population Structure of the Recent brachiopod Terebratulina from Scotland. PALAEONTOLOGY 25, 227–246.Google Scholar
Curry, G. B. 1983. Microborings in Recent brachiopods and the functions of caeca. LETHAIA 16, 119–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curry, G. B. 1987. Molecular Palaentology—new life for old molecules. TRENDS ECOL EVOL 2, 6, 161–165.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Curry, G. B. & Ansell, A. D. 1986. Tissue mass in living brachiopods. In Emig, C. C. & Racheboeuf, P. R. (eds) Proc 1st International Congress Brachiopods, Brest, France. BIOSTRAT PALEOZ 5, 231–241.Google Scholar
Dral, A. D. G. 1967. The movements of the latero-frontal cilia and the mechanism of particle retention in the mussel. NETH J SEA RES 3, 391–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foster, M. W. 1969. Distribution of selected groups of marine invertebrates in water south of 35° latitude—Amer. Geog. Soc. Folio II Antarctic and SubAntarctic Brachiopods. ANTARCTIC J USA 4.Google Scholar
Foster-Smith, R. L. 1975. The effect of concentration of suspension on the filtration rates and pseudofaecal production for Mytilus edulis L., Cerastoderma edule (L.) and Venerupis pullastra (Montagu). J EXP MAR BIOL ECOL 17, 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hemmingsen, A. M. 1960. Energy metabolism as related to body size as respiratory surfaces and its evolution. REPT STENO MEM HOSP COPENHAGEN 9, 1–110.Google Scholar
Hughes, R. N. 1969. A study of feeding in Scrobicularia plana. J MAR BIOL ASSOC UK 49, 805–823.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jablonski, D. & Lutz, R. A. 1983. Larval ecology of marine benthic invertebrates: palaeobiological implications. BIOL REV 58, 21–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
La Barbera, M. 1981. Water flow patterns in and around three species of articulate brachiopods. J EXP MAR BIOL ECOL 55, 185–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
La Barbera, M. 1986. Brachiopod lophophores: functional diversity and scaling. In Emig, C. C. & Racheboeuf, P. R. (eds) Proc 1st International Congres Brachiopods, Brest, France. BIOSTRAT PAEOZ 5, 313–321.Google Scholar
Mayzaud, P. 1973. Respiration and nitrogen excretion of zooplankton. II-Studies of metabolic characteristics of starved animals. MAR BIOL 21, 19–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mohlenberg, F. & Riilsgard, H. U. 1979. Filtration rate, using a new indirect technique, in thirteen species of suspension-feeding bivalves. MAR BIOL 54, 143–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neall, V. E. 1970. Notes on the ecology and palaeoecology of Neothyris, an endemic New Zealand brachiopod. N Z J MAR FRESHW RES 4, 117–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newell, R. C. & Branch, G. M. 1980. The influence of temperature on the maintenance of metabolic energy balance in marine invertebrates. ADV MAR BIOL 17, 329–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Owen, G. & Williams, A. 1969. The caecum of articulate brachiopods. PROC R SOC LONDON B172, 187–201.Google Scholar
Paine, R. T. 1963. Ecology of the brachiopod Glottidia pyramidata. ECOL MONOGR 33, 187–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peck, L. S., Morris, D. J., Clarke, A. & Holmes, L. J. 1986. Oxygen consumption and nitrogen excretion in the Antarctic brachiopod Liothyrella uva (Jackson, 1912) under simulated winter conditions. J EXP MAR BIOL ECOL 104, 203–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peck, L. S., Clarke, A. & Holmes, L. J. 1987. Summer metabolism and seasonal change in biochemical composition of the Antarctic brachiopod Liothyrella uva (Broderip, 1833). J EXP MAR BIOL ECOL 114, 85–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peck, L., Curry, G. B., Ansell, A. D. & James, M. 1989. Temperature and starvation effects on the metabolism of the brachiopod Terebratulina retusa (Linnaeus). HIST BIOL 2, 101–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richardson, J. R. & Watson, J. E. 1975. Form and function in a Recent free living brachiopod Magadina cumingi. PALEOBIOLOGY 1, 379–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodhouse, P. G., Roden, C. M., Burnell, G. M., Hensey, M. P., McMahon, T., Ottway, B. & Ryan, T. H. 1984. Food resource, gametogenesis and growth of Mytilus edulis on the shore and in suspended culture: Killary Harbour, Ireland. J MAR BIOL ASSOC UK 64, 513–529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rudwick, M. J. S. 1962. Notes on the ecology of brachiopods in New Zealand. TRANS R SOC NEW ZEALAND ZOOL 1, 327–335.Google Scholar
Rudwick, M. J. S. 1970. Living and fossil brachiopods. London: Hutchinson.Google Scholar
Shumway, S. E. 1982. Oxygen consumption in brachiopods and the possible role of punctae. J EXP MAR BIOL ECOL 58, 207–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thayer, C. W. 1986. Respiration and the function of brachiopod punctae. LETHAIA 19, 23–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Theisen, B. F. 1982. Variation in size of gills, labial palps and adductor muscle in Mytilus edulis L. (Bivalvia) from Danish waters. OPHELIA 21, 49–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tunnicliffe, V. & Wilson, K. 1988. Brachiopod populations: distribution in fjords of British Columbia (Canada) and tolerance of low oxygen concentration. MAR ECOL PROG SER 47, 2, 117–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vahl, O. 1973. Pumping and oxygen consumption rates of Mytilus edulis L. of different sizes. OPHELIA 12, 45–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valentine, J. W. & Jablonski, D. 1982. Larval adaptations and patterns of brachiopod diversity in space and time. EVOLUTION 37, 5, 1052–1061.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winter, J. E. 1973. The filtration rate of Mytilus edulis and its dependence on algal concentration, measured by continuous automatic recording apparatus. MAR BIOL 22, 317–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zezina, O. N. 1979. On the formation of Recent brachiopod faunas on the shelves and slopes of the world oceans. BYVL MOSK PRIR (BIOL) 84, 52–59.Google Scholar