Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T18:58:58.187Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A peculiar leg structure in the first non-biting midge described from Cambay amber, India (Diptera: Chironomidae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 January 2018

Marta Zakrzewska*
Affiliation:
Department of Invertebrate Zoology and Parasitology, Laboratory of Systematic Zoology, Faculty of Biology, University of Gdańsk, Wita Stwosza 59, 80–308 Gdańsk, Poland. Email: [email protected]
Frauke Stebner
Affiliation:
Steinmann-Institute, Section Palaeontology, University of Bonn, Nussallee 8, D-53115 Bonn, Germany.
Mateusz Puchalski
Affiliation:
Department of Invertebrate Zoology and Parasitology, Laboratory of Systematic Zoology, Faculty of Biology, University of Gdańsk, Wita Stwosza 59, 80–308 Gdańsk, Poland. Email: [email protected]
Hukam Singh
Affiliation:
Birbal Sahni Institute of Palaeosciences, 53 University Road, Lucknow, India.
Wojciech Giłka
Affiliation:
Department of Invertebrate Zoology and Parasitology, Laboratory of Systematic Zoology, Faculty of Biology, University of Gdańsk, Wita Stwosza 59, 80–308 Gdańsk, Poland. Email: [email protected]
*
*Corresponding author

Abstract

We present the first specific record of a chironomid of the tribe Tanytarsini from early Eocene Cambay amber, India (52–53 Ma). The oldest known extinct tanytarsine genus, Gujaratomyia Giłka & Zakrzewska, gen. nov., is described on the basis of adult males of G. miripes Giłka & Zakrzewska, sp. nov. The species displays an unusual leg structure with unique leg ratios and tibial armature. The combination of the head and genital apparatus characters supports the hypothesis that Gujaratomyia and Cladotanytarsus are members of a common group within the subtribe Tanytarsina.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Society of Edinburgh 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

4. References

Andersen, T., Baranov, V., Hagenlund, L. K., Ivković, M., Kvifte, G. M. & Pavlek, M. 2016. Blind Flight? A New Troglobiotic Orthoclad (Diptera, Chironomidae) from the Lukina Jama-Trojama Cave in Croatia. PloS one 11(4), e0152884, 115.Google Scholar
Antoine, P. O., De Franceschi, D., Flynn, J. J., Nel, A., Baby, P., Benammi, M., Calderón, Y., Espurt, N., Goswami, A. & Salas-Gismondi, R. 2006. Amber from western Amazonia reveals Neotropical diversity during the middle Miocene. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 103(37), 13595–600.Google Scholar
Baranov, V., Andersen, T. & Perkovsky, E. E. 2015. Orthoclads from Eocene amber from Sakhalin (Diptera: Chironomidae, Orthocladiinae). Insect Systematics & Evolution 46, 359–78.Google Scholar
Bause, E. 1913. Die Metamorphose der Gattung Tanytarsus und einiger verwandter Tendipedidenart. Ein Beitrag zur Systematic der Tendipediden. Archiv für Hydrobiologie, supplement 2, 1126.Google Scholar
Benton, M. J. & Donoghue, P. C. J. 2007. Paleontological evidence to date the tree of life. Molecular Biology and Evolution 24, 2653.Google Scholar
Brundin, L. 1947. Zur Kenntnis der Schwedischen Chironomiden. Arkiv för Zoologi 39, 195.Google Scholar
Cranston, P. S. 1980. A redescription and generic reassignment of the adults of Halotanytarsus tika Tourenq, 1975 (Diptera, Chironomidae). Annales de Limnologie 16, 203–09.Google Scholar
Engel, M. S., Grimaldi, D. A., Nascimbene, P. C. & Singh, H. 2011. The termites of Early Eocene Cambay amber, with the earliest record of Termitidae (Isoptera). ZooKeys 148, 105–23.Google Scholar
Engel, M. S., Ortega-Blanco, J., Nascimbene, P. C. & Singh, H. 2013. The bees of Early Eocene Cambay amber (Hymenoptera: Apidae). Journal of Melittology 25, 112.Google Scholar
Epler, J. H. 2012. A brachypterous Bryophaenocladius (Diptera: Chironomidae: Orthocladiinae) with hypopygium inversum from Heggie's Rock, Georgia, USA. Zootaxa 3355, 5161.Google Scholar
Giłka, W. 2010. A new species group in the genus Tanytarsus van der Wulp (Diptera: Chironomidae) based on a fossil record from Baltic amber. Acta Geologica Sinica [English Edition] 84, 714–19.Google Scholar
Giłka, W. 2011a. A new fossil Tanytarsus from Eocene Baltic amber, with notes on systematics of the genus (Diptera: Chironomidae). Zootaxa 3069, 6368.Google Scholar
Giłka, W. 2011b. Ochotkowate – Chironomidae, plemię: Tanytarsini, postaci dorosłe, samce. Klucze do oznaczania owadów Polski. [Non-biting midges – Chironomidae, tribe Tanytarsini, adult males. Keys for the Identification of Polish Insects]. No 177, Vol. XXVIII, Muchówki - Diptera, 14b. Polskie Towarzystwo Entomologiczne. Wrocław: Biologica Silesiae. 95 pp.Google Scholar
Giłka, W. 2011c. Six unusual Cladotanytarsus Kieffer: towards a systematics of the genus and resurrection of Lenziella Kieffer (Diptera: Chironomidae: Tanytarsini). Zootaxa 3100, 134.Google Scholar
Giłka, W., Zakrzewska, M., Dominiak, P. & Urbanek, A. 2013. Non-biting midges of the tribe Tanytarsini in Eocene amber from the Rovno region (Ukraine): a pioneer systematic study with notes on the phylogeny (Diptera: Chironomidae). Zootaxa 3736, 569–86.Google Scholar
Giłka, W., Zakrzewska, M., Baranov, V., Wang, B. & Stebner, F. 2016. The first fossil record of Nandeva Wiedenbrug, Reiss et Fittkau (Diptera: Chironomidae) in early Eocene Fushun amber from China. Alcheringa: An Australasian Journal of Palaeontology 40(3), 390–97.Google Scholar
Giłka, W. & Paasivirta, L. 2008. On the systematics of the tribe Tanytarsini (Diptera: Chironomidae) – three new species from Finland. Entomologica Fennica 19, 4148.Google Scholar
Grimaldi, D. A., Engel, M. S., Nascimbene, P. C. & Singh, H. 2013a. Coniopterygidae (Neuroptera, Aleuropteryginae) in amber from the Eocene of India and the Miocene of Hispaniola. American Museum Novitates 3770, 120.Google Scholar
Grimaldi, D. A., Engel, M. S. & Singh, H. 2013b. Bugs in the biogeography: Leptosaldinae (Heteroptera: Leptopodidae) in amber from the Miocene of Hispaniola and Eocene of India. Journal of the Kansas Entomological Society 86, 226–43.Google Scholar
Grimaldi, D. A. & Singh, H. 2012. The extinct genus Pareuthychaeta in Eocene ambers (Diptera: Schizophora: Ephydroidea). The Canadian Entomologist 144, 1728.Google Scholar
Kieffer, J. J. 1921a. Synopse de la tribu des Chironomariae (Diptères). Annales de la Société Scientifique de Bruxelles 40, 269–77.Google Scholar
Kieffer, J. J. 1921b. Chironomides nouveaux ou peu connus de la région paléarctique. Bulletin de la Société d'histoire naturelle de Metz 29: 51109.Google Scholar
Kieffer, J. J. 1922. Noveaux Chironomides à larves aquatiques. Annales de la Société Scientifique de Bruxelles 41, 355–67.Google Scholar
Krzemiński, W. & Jarzembowski, E. 1999. Aenne triassica sp. n., the oldest representatives of the family Chironomidae (Insecta: Diptera). Polskie Pismo Entomologiczne 68, 445–49.Google Scholar
Lehmann, J. 1973. Systematik und phylogenetische Studie über die Gattung Thienemanniola Kieffer und Corynocera Zetterstedt (Diptera: Chironomidae). Hydrobiolgia 43, 381414.Google Scholar
McCann, T. 2010. Chenier plain sedimentation in the Palaeogene-age lignite-rich successions of the Surat area, Gujarat, western India. Zeitschrift der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Geowissenschaften 161, 335–51.Google Scholar
Myers, N., Mittermeier, R. A., Mittermeier, C. G., Da Fonseca, G. A. B. & Kent, J. 2000. Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 403, 853–58.Google Scholar
Newman, E. 1834. Attempted division of British insects into natural orders. Entomological Magazine 2, 379431.Google Scholar
Pape, T., Blagoderov, V. & Mostovski, M. B. 2011. Order Diptera Linnaeus, 1758. In Zhang, Z.-Q. (ed.) Animal biodiversity: An outline of higher-level classification and survey of taxonomic richness. Zootaxa 3148, 222–29.Google Scholar
Rust, J., Singh, H., Rana, R. S., McCann, T., Singh, L., Anderson, K. Sarkar, N., Nascimbene, P. F., Stebner, F., Thomas, J. C., Solórzano-Kraemer, M., Williams, C. J., Engel, M. S., Sahni, A. & Grimaldi, D. 2010. Biogeographic and evolutionary implications of a diverse paleobiota in amber from the early Eocene of India. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 107(43), 18360–65.Google Scholar
Sæther, O. A. 1971. Four new and unusual Chironomidae (Diptera). Canadian Entomologist 103, 17991827.Google Scholar
Sæther, O. A. 1980. Glossary of chironomid morphology terminology (Diptera: Chironomidae). Entomologica scandinavica, supplement 14, 151.Google Scholar
Seredszus, F. & Wichard, W. 2007. Fossil chironomids (Insecta, Diptera) in Baltic amber. Palaeontographica A 279(1–3), 4991.Google Scholar
Smith, T., Kumar, K., Rana, R. S., Folie, A. Solé, F., Noiret, C., Steeman, T., Sahni, A. & Rose, K. 2016. New early Eocene vertebrate assemblage from western India reveals a mixed fauna of European and Gondwana affinities. Geoscience Frontiers 7, 9691001.Google Scholar
Solórzano Kraemer, M. M. & Evenhuis, N. L. 2008. The first keroplatid (Diptera: Keroplatidae) species from the Lower Eocene amber of Vastan, Gujarat, India. Zootaxa 1816, 5760.Google Scholar
Solórzano Kraemer, M. M. & Wagner, R. 2009. The first psychodid (Diptera: Psychodidae: Phlebotominae) species from the Lower Eocene amber of Vastan, Gujarat, India. Zootaxa 2152, 6368.Google Scholar
Stebner, F., Szadziewski, R., Singh, H., Gunkel, S. & Rust, J. 2017a. Biting midges (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae) from Cambay amber indicate that the Eocene fauna of the Indian subcontinent was not isolated. PLoS one 12(1), e0169144.Google Scholar
Stebner, F., Baranov, V., Zakrzewska, M., Singh, H. & Giłka, W. 2017b. The Chironomidae diversity based on records from early Eocene Cambay amber, India, with implications on habitats of fossil Diptera. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 475, 154–61.Google Scholar
Stebner, F., Singh, H., Rust, J. & Grimaldi, D. 2017c. Lygistorrhinidae (Diptera: Bibionomorpha: Sciaroidea) in early Eocene Cambay amber. PeerJ 5, e3313.Google Scholar
Tourenq, J.-N. 1975. Recherches écologiques sur les Chironomidés (Diptera) de Camargue. Doctoral Dissertation, Université Paul-Sabatier, Toulouse, France.Google Scholar
Veltz, I., Azar, D., & Nel, A. 2007. New chironomid flies in Early Cretaceous Lebanese amber (Diptera: Chironomidae). African Invertebrates 48(1), 169–91.Google Scholar
Wang, B., Rust, J., Engel, M. S., Szwedo, J., Dutta, S., Nel, A., Fan, Y., Meng, F., Shi, G., Jarzembowski, E. A., Wappler, T., Stebner, F., Fang, Y., Mao, L., Zheng, D. & Zhang, H. 2014. A diverse paleobiota in early Eocene Fushun amber from China. Current Biology 24, 1606–10.Google Scholar
Wulp van der, F. M. 1874. Dipterologische aanteekneningen. Tijdschrift voor Entomologie 17, 109–48.Google Scholar
Zachos, J. C., Dickens, G. R. & Zeebe, R. E. 2008. An early Cenozoic perspective on greenhouse warming and carbon-cycle dynamics. Nature 451, 279–83.Google Scholar
Zakrzewska, M., Krzemiński, W. & Giłka, W. 2016. Towards the diversity of non-biting midges of the tribe Tanytarsini from Eocene Baltic amber (Diptera: Chironomidae). Palaeontologia Electronica 19.2.18A, 121.Google Scholar
Zakrzewska, M. & Giłka, W. 2013. In the Eocene, the extant genus Caladomyia occurred in the Palaearctic (Diptera: Chironomidae: Tanytarsini). Polish Journal of Entomology 82, 397403.Google Scholar
Zakrzewska, M. & Giłka, W. 2014. The oldest chironomids of the tribe Tanytarsini (Diptera: Chironomidae) indicate plesiomorphic character states. Geobios 47, 335–43.Google Scholar
Zakrzewska, M. & Giłka, W. 2015a. The Tanytarsini (Diptera: Chironomidae) in the collection of the Museum of Amber Inclusions, University of Gdańsk. Zootaxa 3946, 347–60.Google Scholar
Zakrzewska, M. & Giłka, W. 2015b. Eonandeva gen. nov., a new distinctive genus from Eocene Baltic amber (Diptera: Chironomidae). Zootaxa 4044, 577–84.Google Scholar
Zavřel, J. 1917. O dýchání a dýchacích ústrojích larev Chironomid. Rozpravy České Akademie Věd a Umění, Třída 2 (Mathematicko-Přírodnická) 26(3), 126.Google Scholar
Zetterstedt, J. W. 1838. Dipterologis Scandinaviae. Sect. 3: Diptera. Insecta lapponica 1838, 477868.Google Scholar