Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-04T19:32:12.692Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

I.—Further Observations on the Scottish Carboniferous Eurypterids*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 July 2012

Charles D. Waterston
Charles D. Waterston
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, Royal Scottish Museum.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Synopsis

A series of specimens from the Scottish Limestone Coal Group (Lower Namurian) is described, among which occurs Adelophthalmus cf. wilsoni (Woodward) from West Lothian, a group of specimens from the No. 2 Ironstone of Loanhead, Midlothian, one of which is recognized as belonging to the new species Mycterops (?) blairi, and a prosomal appendage from Lanarkshire which is referred to the genus Hibbertopterus. New evidence is presented on the nature of the prosomal appendages of Eurypterus (?) stevensoni R. Etheridge jr. which is designated the type species of the new genus Dunsopterus. The Coal Measures species Glyptoscorpius minutisculptus Peach is recognized as an eurypterid for which the new genus Vernonopterus is created. The systematics of these and other late palaeozoic genera which have been included by Kjellesvig-Waering (1966) in the families Woodwardopteridae and Hibbertopteridae are discussed.

Type
Research Article
Information
Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of The Royal Society of Edinburgh , Volume 68 , Issue 1 , 1968 , pp. 1 - 20
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1968

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References to Literature

Caster, K. E., and Kjellesvig-Waering, E. N., 1964. “Upper Ordovician Eurypterids of Ohio”, Palaeont. Amer., 4, No. 32, 301–358.Google Scholar
Beecher, C. E., 1900. “Restoration of Stylonurus Lacoanus, a Giant Arthropod from the Upper Devonian of the United States”, Am. J. Sci., 160, 148.Google Scholar
Diener, C., 1924. Fossilium Catalogus, 1: Pars. 25: Eurypterida. Berlin.Google Scholar
Etheridge, R. Jr., 1877. “On the remains of a large Crustacean, probably indicative of a New Species of Eurypterus, or allied Genus (Eurypterus (?) Stevensoni), from the Lower Carboniferous Series (Cementstone Group), of Berwickshire”, Quart. J. Geol. Soc. Lond., 33, 223–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kjellesvig-Waering, E. N., 1948. “The Mazon Creek Eurypterid: A Revision of the Genus Lepidoderma”, Illinois Sci. Pap., 3, No. 4.Google Scholar
Kjellesvig-Waering, E. N., 1959. “A Taxonomic Review of some late Paleozoic Eurypterida”, J. Paleont., 33, 251–256.Google Scholar
Kjellesvig-Waering, E. N., 1961. “Nota sobre la presencia de un Eurypteridea en el Devonico Inferior de la Argentina”, Revta Assoc. Geol. Argent., 15, 109–111.Google Scholar
Kjellesvig-Waering, E. N., 1963. “Pennsylvanian Invertebrates of the Mazon Creek Area, Illinois: Eurypterida”, Fieldiana, Geol., 12, 85–106.Google Scholar
Kjellesvig-Waering, E. N., 1966. “A Revision of the Families and Genera of the Stylonuracea (Eurypterida)”, Fieldiana, Geol. 14, 169–197.Google Scholar
Moore, L. R., 1936. “Some Eurypterids from the English Coal Measures”, Proc. Geol. Ass., 47, 352–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Novojilov, N., 1959. “Mérostomates du Dévonien inférieur et moyen de Sibérie”, Annls Soc. Geol. N., 88, 243–258.Google Scholar
Novojilov, N., 1962. Fundamentals of Palaeontology. Eurypterida, pp. 404–422, Moscow.Google Scholar
Peach, B. N., 1905. “Note on a specimen of “Glyptoscorpius” from the Coal Measures of Airdrie, the property of Robert Dunlop, of Baillieston”, Trans. Geol. Soc. Glasg., 13, 1–3.Google Scholar
Pruvost, P., 1925. “Un Eurypteride nouveau du Terrain houillier de Charleroi”, Annls Soc. Geol. N., 48, 143–151.Google Scholar
Størmer, L., 1951. “A New Eurypterid from the Ordovician of Montgomeryshire, Wales”, Geol. Mag., 88, 409–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Størmer, L., 1955. “Chelicerata”, Treat. Invert. Paleont. Part P, Arthropoda 2, Kansas.Google Scholar
Størmer, L., and Waterston, C. D., 1968. “Cyrtoctenus gen. nov., a large palaeozoic Arthropod with pectinate Appendages”, Trans. Roy. Soc. Edinb., 68, No. 4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stur, D., 1877. “Die Culm-Flora der Ostrauer und Waldenburger Schichten”, Abh. Geol. Bundesanst., Wien, 8, 449–450.Google Scholar
Traquair, R. H., 1903. “On the Distribution of Fossil Fish Remains in the Carboniferous Rocks of the Edinburgh District”, Trans. Roy. Soc. Edinb., 40, 687–707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tulloch, W., and Walton, H. S., 1958. “The Geology of the Midlothian Coalfield” Mem. Geol. Surv. U.K.Google Scholar
Van, Oyen F. H., 1956. “Contribution à la connaissance du genre Adelophthalmus Jordan et Meyer 1854”, Meded. Geol. Sticht., Ser. C–IV–3, 7, 98pp.Google Scholar
Waterston, C. D., 1957. “The Scottish Carboniferous Eurypterida” Trans. Roy. Soc. Edinb., 63, 265–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wills, L. J., 1964. “The ventral anatomy of the Upper Carboniferous eurypterid Anthraconectes Meek and Worthen”, Palaeontology, 7, 474–507.Google Scholar
Woodward, H., 1887. “On a new species of Eurypterus from the Lower Carboniferous shales of Glencartholm, Eskdale, Scotland”, Geol. Mag., 4, 481–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar