Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-19T02:16:03.021Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Graphite in Eastern Ghats Precambrian migmatites, Orissa, India

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 November 2011

B. C. Acharya  and
B. Dash
B. C. Acharya
Affiliation:
Regional Research Laboratory, Bhubaneswar 751013, Orissa, India.
B. Dash
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, Utkal University, Bhubaneswar 751004, Orissa, India.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Graphite bodies of economic importance occur in the Eastern Ghats migmatite complex of Orissa, India, which consists of sillimanite-rich gneiss (khondalite), calc-silicate granulite, basic (pyroxene) granulite and acidic gneiss palaeosomes and a variety of quartzofeldspathic neosomes and pegmatite veins. There is more graphite in migmatised khondalite and calc-silicate granulite than in their unmigmatised counterparts and it is common at pegmatite-country rock margins. Lodes of graphite are structurally controlled by fold hinge zones, necks of boudins and along the dominant foliation in rocks that show the effects of polyphase deformation. Faults, fractures and joints also act as structural controls. The richest lodes are located where there is the coincidence of several lithological and structural features.

The graphite occurs in graphite-rich schists and gneisses, as veins and as disseminated flakes along grain boundaries and in microfractures and cleavages. It is present in all rock types except pegmatites emplaced after the D4 deformational phase, and is localised in structures developed during the D1, D2, D3 and D4 phases. Most of the bodies of graphite are lenticular and show pinch and swell characters. Fourteen textural and microstructural habits have been recognised and are described with many of the features of fabric, such as intergrowths, inclusions and kinks being particularly well shown under reflected light.

Methanation of carbonate minerals is considered the most likely initial stage in the formation of the carbon with subsequent pyrolysis of the methane being the process of graphitisation. While the possibility of the carbon being either of sedimentary derivation orfrom igneous-derived CO2 cannot be ruled out, there is no convincing evidence for such sources. Remobilisation of graphite following its formation by pyrolysis of methane in structurally controlled low pressure zones is the dominant mechanism of concentration. Thefabric features point to the graphite having moved as a solid phase along open spaces inthe gangue minerals while still maintaining its crystallinity, and having been deformed in the process. The effects of remobilisation apparently have obliterated evidence relating to other methods of concentration.

Keywords

boudincalc-silicate granulitecarbonatedeformationfabricfoldfoliationgneissgranulitegraphitisationkhondalitekinklodemethanationpegmatitepolyphaspyrolysisremobilisationreflected lightstructuretexturevein
Type
Research Article
Information
Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of The Royal Society of Edinburgh , Volume 75 , Issue 4 , 1984 , pp. 391 - 406
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Acharya, B. C. 1979. Graphite in the Eastern Ghats rocks. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Utkal University.Google Scholar
Acharya, B. C. 1980. Some aspects of graphite deposits of Orissa. In Proceedings of Minerex-80 symposium Utilization of non-metallic minerals resources of India 2, V 1–6. Regional Research Laboratory, Jammu.Google Scholar
Acharya, B. C. & Dash, B. 1976. A note on some textural evidences of graphite genesis in the Eastern Ghats group. PRAKRUTI UTKAL UNIV J SCI 13, 25–9.Google Scholar
Acharya, B. C. & Dash, B. 1978. Structural control of graphite lodes in parts of Eastern Ghats Group, Orissa. EXPLORER J DIR MINES ORISSA 15, 16–8.Google Scholar
Acharya, B. C. & Dash, B. 1980. Distribution of graphite deposits in Orissa and its relation with regional geology. MET MINER REV 19(7), 1–3.Google Scholar
Bain, G. W. 1929. The graphite deposits of Louisa, Quebec. ECON GEOL 24, 733–52.Google Scholar
Bastin, E. S. 1910. Origin of certain Adirondack graphite deposits. ECON GEOL 5, 134–57.Google Scholar
Bastin, E. S. 1912. Graphite deposits of Ceylon. ECON GEOL 7, 419–43.Google Scholar
Beckinsale, R. D., Drury, S. A. & Holt, R. W. 1980. 3360-Myr old gneisses from the South Indian Craton. NATURE 283, 469–70.Google Scholar
Bowes, D. R. & Hopgood, A. M. 1976. Significance of structural trend in Precambrian terrain. ACTA GEOL POL 26, 57–82.Google Scholar
Brown, J. S. 1925. Graphite deposits of Ashland, Alabama. ECON GEOL 20, 208–48.Google Scholar
Chatterjee, S. C. 1974. Petrography of the igneous and metamorphic rocks of India, 1st edn.Madras: Macmillan India.Google Scholar
Clark, T. 1921. The origin of graphite. ECON GEOL 16, 167–83.Google Scholar
Craig, H. 1954. Geochemical implications of the isotopie composition of carbon in ancient rocks. GEOCHIM COSMOCHIM ACTA 6, 186–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dana, E. S. 1953. A Text Book of Mineralogy. 4th edn.New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Dash, B. & Acharya, B. C. 1978. Sandstone intrusives in graphite bearing khondalites, Bolangir district, Orissa. ABSTR PROC INDIAN SCI CONG ASSOC, V(3), 126.Google Scholar
Dash, B. & Acharya, B. C. 1979. Montmorillonite from xenoliths in pegmatite associated with Eastern Ghats group. ABSTR PROC INDIAN SCI CONG ASSOC V(3), 131.Google Scholar
Dasgupta, S. K. 1954. The graphite deposit of Narsipatnam, Madras. Q J GEOL MIN MET SOC INDIA 26, 105–13.Google Scholar
Eck, R. V., Lippincott, E. R., Dayhoff, M. O. & Pratt, Y. T. 1966. Thermodynamic equilibrium and the inorganic origin of organic compounds. SCIENCE 153, 628–33Google Scholar
Erdosh, G. 1970. Geology of BOgala mine, Ceylon and the origin of vein-type graphite. MINER DEPOSITA 5, 375–82.Google Scholar
Ford, R. B. 1954. Occurrence and origin of the graphite deposits near Dillon, Montana. ECON GEOL 49, 31–43.Google Scholar
Giardini, A. A. & Salotti, C. A. 1968. Synthesis of graphite and hydrocarbons by reaction between calcite and hydrogen. SCIENCE 159, 317–9.Google Scholar
Giardini, A. A. & Salotti, C. A. 1969. Kinetics and relations in the calcite-hydrogen reactions and relations in the dolomite-hydrogen and siderite-hydrogen systems. AM MINERAL 54, 1151–72.Google Scholar
Halden, N. M., Bowes, D. R. & Dash, B. 1982. Structural evolution of migmatites in granulite facies ferrane: Precambrian crystalline complex of Angui, Orissa, India. TRANS R SOC EDINBURGH EARTH SCI 73, 109–18.Google Scholar
Hopgood, A. M. 1968. The structural geology and tectonic history of Precambrian rocks exposed in the Kinarsani River, eastern Andhra Pradesh. J INDIAN GEOSCI ASSOC 8, 13–34.Google Scholar
Karkhanis, S. N. 1977. Synthesis of abiogenic graphite under Precambrian conditions. J GEOL SOC INDIA 18, 97–103.Google Scholar
Krishnan, M. S. 1953. The structural and tectonic history of India. MEM GEOL SURV INDIA 81, 1–109.Google Scholar
Krishnan, M. S., 1968. Geology of India and Burma, 5th edn.Madras: Sankar.Google Scholar
Krishna, Rao J. S. R. & Malleswar, Rao V. 1965. Occurrence and origin of graphite inparts of Eastern Ghats, South India. ECON GEOL 60, 1046–51.Google Scholar
Landis, C. A. 1971. Graphitization of dispersed carbonaceous material in metamorphic rocks. CONTRIB MINERAL PETROL 30, 34–45.Google Scholar
Miller, B. L. 1912. Graphite deposits of Pennsylvania. ECON GEOL 7, 762–77.Google Scholar
Noda, T. 1969. Influence of different factors on graphitization. In Aspects fondamataux de la carbonisation et de la graphitization. J CHEMIE PHYS PHYSICO-CHEMIE BIOL SPEC NUMBER 151–9.Google Scholar
Pacault, A. 1971. Kinetics of graphitization. In Chemistry and physics of carbon, 7, 107–54. New York: Marcel Dekker.Google Scholar
Park, A. F. & Dash, B. 1984. Charnockite and related neosome development in the Eastern Ghats, Orissa, India: petrographie evidence. TRANS R SOC EDINBURGH EARTH SCI 75, 341–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paulose, C. V. 1956. Charnockite and associated rocks of Cape Komurine. BULL MYSORE GEOL ASSOC 9.Google Scholar
Ramdohr, P. 1969. The ore minerals and their intergrowths, 3rd edn.London: Pergamon.Google Scholar
Roy, B. C. 1963. Tectonic map of India. Calcutta: Geological Survey of India.Google Scholar
Salotti, C. A., Heinrich, E. W. & Giardini, A. A. 1971. Abiotic carbon and the formation of graphite deposits. ECON GEOL 66, 929–32.Google Scholar
Salotti, C. A., Heinrich, E. W. & Giardini, A. A. 1972. Discussionson “Abioticcarbon and the formation of graphite deposits”. ECON GEOL 67, 383–5.Google Scholar
Sederholm, J. J. 1967. Selected works: granites and migmatites. Edinburgh: Oliver & Boyd.Google Scholar
Strens, R. G. J. 1965. The graphite deposits of Seathwaite in Borrowdale, Cumberland. GEOL MAG 102, 393–406.Google Scholar
Swami, Nath J. & Ramakrishnan, M. 1981. Early Precambrian supracrustals of southern Karnataka. MEM GEOL SURV INDIA 112.Google Scholar
Tilley, C. E. 1921. The graphite rocks of Sleaford Bay, South Australia. ECON GEOL 16, 184–98.Google Scholar
Ubbelohdf, A. R. & Lewis, F. A. 1960. Graphite and its crystal compounds. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Walker, P. L. 1962. Carbon an old but new material. AM SCI 50, 259–93.Google Scholar
Walker, T. L. 1902. Geology of Kalahandi State, Central Province. MEM GEOL SURV INDIA 33(3), 1–22.Google Scholar
Winchell, A. N. 1911. A theory for the origin of graphite as exemplified in the graphite deposits, near Dillon, Montana. ECON GEOL 6, 218–30.Google Scholar
Winkler, H. G. F. 1976. Petrogenesis of metamorphic rocks, 4th edn. New York: Springer.Google Scholar