Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T04:32:28.689Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effects of biochar on soil physical properties and winter wheat growth

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 March 2013

Rachel C. Devereux ,
Craig J. Sturrock  and
Sacha J. Mooney
Rachel C. Devereux
Affiliation:
Division of Agricultural and Environmental Science, School of Biosciences, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham NG7 2RD, UK
Craig J. Sturrock
Affiliation:
Division of Agricultural and Environmental Science, School of Biosciences, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham NG7 2RD, UK
Sacha J. Mooney
Affiliation:
Division of Agricultural and Environmental Science, School of Biosciences, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham NG7 2RD, UK
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Biochar has been reported to improve soil quality and crop yield; however, less is known about its effects on the physical and, in particular, structural properties of soil. This study examines the potential ability of biochar to improve water retention and crop growth through a pot trial using biochar concentrations of 0%, 1·5%, 2·5% and 5% w/w. X-ray computed tomography was used to measure soil structure via pore size characteristics; this showed that pore size is significantly affected by biochar concentration. Increasing biochar is associated with decreasing average pore size, which we hypothesise would impact heavily on hydraulic performance. At the end of the experiment, average pore size had decreased from 0·07 mm2 in the 0% biochar soil to 0·046 mm2 in the 5% biochar soil. Increased biochar concentration also significantly decreases saturated hydraulic conductivity and soil bulk density. It was also observed that increased biochar significantly decreases soil water repellency. Increased water retention was also observed at low matric potentials, where it was shown that increased biochar is able to retain more water as the soil dried out. The application of biochar had little effect on short-term (<10 weeks) wheat growth, but did improve water retention through a change in soil porosity, pore size, bulk density and wetting ability.

Keywords

Soil pore sizewater release characteristicswater repellencyX-ray computed tomography
Type
Biochar
Information
Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of The Royal Society of Edinburgh , Volume 103 , Issue 1 , March 2012 , pp. 13 - 18
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Society of Edinburgh 2012 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

4. References

Asai, H., Samson, B. K., Stephan, H. M., Songyikhangsuthor, K., Homma, K., Kiyono, Y., Inoue, Y., Shiraiwa, T. & Horie, T. 2009. Biochar amendment techniques for upland rice production in Northern Laos 1. Soil physical properties, leaf SPAD and grain yield. Field Crops Research 111, 81–84.Google Scholar
Atkinson, B. S., Sparkes, D. L. & Mooney, S. J. 2009. The impact of soil structure on the establishment of winter wheat (Triticum aestivum). European Journal of Agronomy 30, 243–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atkinson, C. J., Fitzgerald, J. D. & Hipps, N. A. 2010. Potential mechanisms for achieving agricultural benefits from biochar application to temperate soils: a review. Plant and Soil 337, 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, D. A., Johnson, G. R. & Spolek, G. A. 2011. Amending greenroof soil with biochar to affect runoff water quantity and quality. Environmental Pollution 159, 2111–18.Google Scholar
Bisdom, E. B. A., Dekker, L. W. & Schoute, J. F. T. 1993. Water repellency of sieve fractions from sandy soils and relationships with organic material on soil structure. Geoderma 56, 105–18.Google Scholar
Briggs, C. M., Breiner, J. & Graham, R. C. 2005. Contributions of Pinus Ponderosa Charcoal to Soil Chemical and Physical Properties. The ASA–CSSA–SSSA International Annual Meetings, Salt Lake City, U.S.A.Google Scholar
Brockhoff, S. R., Christians, N. E., Killorn, R. J., Horton, R. & Davis, D. D. 2010. Physical and Mineral-Nutrition Properties of Sand-Based Turfgrass Root Zones Amended with Biochar. Agronomy Journal 102, 1627–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, R. A., Kercher, A. K., Nguyen, T. H., Nagle, D. C. & Ball, W. P. 2006. Production and characterization of synthetic wood chars for use as surrogates for natural sorbents. Organic Geochemistry 37, 321–33.Google Scholar
Chan, K. Y., Van Zwieten, L., Meszaros, I., Downie, A. & Joseph, S. 2007. Agronomic values of greenwaste biochar as a soil amendment. Australian Journal of Soil Research 45, 629–34.Google Scholar
Doerr, S. H., Shakesby, R. A. & Walsh, R. P. D. 2000. Soil water repellency: its causes, characteristics and hydro-geomorphological significance. Earth-Science Reviews 51, 33–65.Google Scholar
Doerr, S. H., Woods, S. W., Martin, D. A. & Casimiro, M. 2009. ‘Natural background’ soil water repellency in conifer forests of the north-western USA: Its prediction and relationship to wildfire occurrence. Journal of Hydrology 371, 12–21.Google Scholar
Downie, A., Crosky, A. & Munroe, P. 2009. Physical properties of biochar. In Lehmann, J. L. & Joseph, S. (eds) Biochar for Environmental management: Science and Technology, 13–32. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
Dugan, E., Verhoef, A., Robinson, S. & Sohi, S. 2010. Bio-char from sawdust, maize stover and charcoal: Impact on water holding capacities (WHC) of three soils from Ghana. In 19th World Congress of Soil Science, Soil Solutions for a Changing World 11. Brisbane, Australia: Published on DVD.Google Scholar
Gaskin, J. W., Speir, A., Morris, L. M., Ogden, L., Harris, K., Lee, D. & Das, K. C. 2007. Potential for pyrolysis char to affect soil moisture and nutrient status of loamy sand soil. In Georgia Water Resources Conference 2007, University of Georgia, USA. Atlanta, Georgia: Georgia Water Resources Institute.Google Scholar
Glaser, B., Haumaier, L., Guggenberger, G. & Zech, W. 2001. The Terra Preta phenomenon: a model for sustainable agriculture in the humid tropics. Naturwissenschaften 88, 37–41.Google Scholar
Hillel, D. 1998. Environmental soil physics. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Jones, B. E. H., Haynes, R. J. & Phillips, I. R. 2010. Effect of amendment of bauxite processing sand with organic materials on its chemical, physical and microbial properties. Journal of Environmental Management 91, 2281–88.Google Scholar
Karhu, K., Mattila, T., Bergstrom, I. & Regina, K. 2011. Biochar addition to agricultural soil increased CH4 uptake and water holding capacity – Results from a short-term pilot field study. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 140, 309–13.Google Scholar
Laird, D., Fleming, P., Wang, B., Horton, R. & Karlen, D. 2010. Impact of biochar amendments on the quality of a typical Midwestern agriclutural soil. Geoderma 158, 443–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Major, J., Steiner, C., Downie, A. & Lehmann, J. 2009. Biochar effects on nutrient leaching. In Lehmann, J. L. & Joseph, S. (eds) Biochar for Environmental management: Science and Technology, 271–88. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
Major, J., Lehmann, J., Rondon, M. & Goodale, C. 2010. Fate of soil-applied black carbon: downward migration, leaching and soil respiration. Global Change Biology 16, 1366–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Novak, J. M., Lima, I., Xing, B., Gaskin, J. W., Steiner, C., Das, K. C., Ahmedna, M., Rehrah, D., Watts, D. W., Busscher, W. J. & Schomberg, H. 2009. Characterization of designer biochar produced at different temperatures and their effects on loamy sand. Annals of Environmental Science 3, 195–206.Google Scholar
Oguntunde, P. G., Abiodun, B. J., Ajayi, A. E. & Van de Giesen, N. 2008. Effects of charcoal production on soil physical properties in Ghana. Jounal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science 171, 591–96.Google Scholar
Pastor-Villegas, J., Pastore-Valle, J. F., Meneses Rodríguez, J. M. & García, M. 2006. Study of commercial wood charcoals for the preparation of carbon adsorbents. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis 76, 103–08.Google Scholar
Rowell, D. L. 1994. Soil Science: Methods and Applications. Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Scott, D. F. 2000. Soil wettability in forested catchments in South Africa; as measured by different methods and as affected by vegetation cover and soil characteristics. Journal of Hydrology 231, 87–104.Google Scholar
Sohi, S., Lopez-Capel, E., Krull, E. & Bol, R. 2009. Biochar, climate change and soil: a review to guide future research. CSIRO Land and Water Science Report 05/09. Melbourne, Australia: CSIRO.Google Scholar
Sohi, S., Krull, E., Lopez-Capel, E. & Bol, R. 2010. A review of biochar and its use and function in soil. Advances in Agronomy 105, 47–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uzoma, K. C., Inoue, M., Andry, H., Fujimaki, H., Zahoor, A. & Nishihara, E. 2011. Effect of cow manure biochar on maize productivity under sandy soil condition. Soil Use and Management 27, 205–12.Google Scholar
Verheijen, F. G. A., Jefferey, S., Bastos, A. C., van der Velde, M. & Diafas, I. 2009. Biochar Application to Soils – A Critical Scientific Review of Effects on Soil Properties, Processes and Functions. JRC Scientific and Technical Report EUR 24099 EN. Luxembourg: Office for the Official Publications of the European Communities. 149 pp.Google Scholar
Vaccari, F. P., Baronti, S., Lugato, E., Genesio, L., Castaldi, S., Fornasier, F. & Miglietta, F. 2011. Biochar as a strategy to sequester carbon and increase yield in durum wheat. European Journal of Agronomy 34, 231–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zavala, l. M, Granged, A. J. P., Jordan, A. & Barcenas-Moreno, G. 2010. Effect of burning temperature on water repellency and aggregate stability in forest soils under laboratory conditions. Geoderma 158, 366–74.Google Scholar