Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T07:28:24.613Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Blairgowrie magnetic anomaly and its interpretation using simplex optimisation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 November 2011

Colin G. Farquharson
Affiliation:
C. G. Farquharson and R. Thompson, Department of Geology and Geophysics, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH9 3JW, U.K.

Abstract

The large magnetic anomaly which runs along the Highland Boundary Fault of Scotland immediately to the NW of Blairgowrie has been studied by both a ground-based magnetic survey and a palaeomagnetic investigation. A newly developed optimisation program, making use of a simplex algorithm, was used to model the long wavelength component of this effectively two-dimensional anomaly. The consequent model consists of a vertical, rectangular body, 3 km wide and 13 km deep, whose top surface is 2 km below ground level, with a magnetisation directed vertically downwards. The composition of this body is most likely to be that of an ultra-basic, metamorphic complex which has been brought up to its present position between two of the many near-vertical faults in the area. The medium wavelength structure of the anomaly was modelled using the common technique of trial and error, and can be interpreted in terms of a pair of Devonian andesitic lavas and a small extension of the main ultrabasic block. Subsequent palaeomagnetic remanence measurements confirmed that the magnetisation of the two lavas recorded a Devonian polarity reversal. The magnetisation of the ultrabasics is directed vertically downwards, exactly as deduced from the earlier modelling work.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allen, D. A. 1928. The geology of the Highland Border from Tayside to Noranside. TRANS R SOC EDINBURGH LVI, 5788.Google Scholar
Anderson, J. G. C. 1946. The geology of the Highland Border: Stonehaven to Arran. TRANS R SOC EDINBURGH LXI, 479515Google Scholar
Armstrong, M. & Paterson, I. B. 1970. The Lower Old Red Sandstone of the Strathmore region. Rep. No 70/12, Inst. Geol Sci. 23pp. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
BGS,1981. 1: 250000 Sheet 56°N 04°W, Tay-Forth (Aeromagnetic Anomaly), British Geological Survey.Google Scholar
Gill, P. E., Murray, W. & Wright, M. H. 1981. Practical optimization. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Heiland, C. A. 1940. Geophysical exploration. New York: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Hipkin, R. G. & Hussain, A. 1981. Regional Gravity Map of the British Isles, Northern Sheet, 1: 625000, Univ. of Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Marobhe, I. M. 1990. A versatile Turbo—Pascal program for optimization of magnetic anomalies caused by two-dimensional dike, prism, or slope models. COMPUT GEOSCI 16, 341–65.Google Scholar
Nelder, J. A. & Mead, R. 1965. A simplex method for function minimization. COMPUT J 7, 308–13.Google Scholar
Parasnis, D. S. 1979. Principles of applied geophysics. 3rd Edn. London: Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar
Piper, J. D. A. 1978. Palaeomagnetism of the Southern Uplands block in Ordovician times. SCOTT J GEOL 14, 93107.Google Scholar
Powell, D. W. 1978. Geology of a continental margin 3: gravity and magnetic anomaly interpretation of the Girvan-Ballantrae district. In Bowes, D. R. & Leake, B. E. (eds) Crustal evolution in northwestern Britain and adjacent regions, 151–62 GEOL J SPEC ISS No 10.Google Scholar
Press, W. H., Flannery, B. P., Teukolsky, S. A. & Vetterling, W. T. 1986. Numerical recipes: the art of scientific computing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Shive, P. N., Frost, B. R. & Peretti, A., 1988. The magnetic properties of metaperidotite rocks as a function of metamorphic grade: implications for crustal magnetic anomalies. J GEOPHYS RES 93, B10, 12187–95.Google Scholar
Smith, R. A., 1959. Some depth formulae for local magnetic and gravity anomalies. GEOPHYS PROSP 7, 5563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stone, P. & Smellie, J. L. 1988. Classic areas of British Geology: the Ballantrae area: a description of the solid geology of parts of 1:25000 sheets NX 08, 18 and 19. London: HMSO for British Geological Survey.Google Scholar
Telford, W. M., Geldard, L. P., Sheriff, R. E. & Keys, D. A. 1985. Applied geophysics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Torsvik, T. H., Smethurst, M. A., Briden, J. C., and Sturt, B. A. 1990. A review of Palaeozoic palaeomagnetic data from Europe and their palaeogeographical implications. In McKerrow, W. S. & Scotese, C. R. (eds), Palaeozoic palaeogeography and biogeography. GEOL SOC MEM 12, 2541.Google Scholar
Tukey, J. W. 1977. Exploratory data analysis. Reading, Mass: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar