Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T02:54:40.110Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A redescription of the Carboniferous arachnid Plesiosiro madeleyi Pocock, 1911 (Arachnida: Haptopoda)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 November 2011

Jason A. Dunlop
Jason A. Dunlop
Affiliation:
Institut für Systematische Zoologie, Museum für Naturkunde, D-10115 Berlin, Germany
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Plesiosiro madeleyi Pocock, 1911, the monotypic representative of the fossil order Haptopoda Pocock, 1911 from the British Middle Coal Measures (Upper Carboniferous, Westphalian B) of Coseley, Staffordshire, is redescribed. A specimen from Sparth Bottoms, Lancashire is not a Plesiosiro and is referred to Arthropoda incertae sedis. Plesiosiro was probably a predator, having tooth-like projections on the femora for prey capture, and shows adaptations of the limbs for crawling in narrow spaces. The uncertain nature of the chelicerae, eyes and respiratory organs makes resolving the phylogenetic position of Plesiosiro difficult, though Haptopoda deserves its status as a separate order. Plesiosiro resembles both cythophthalmid and trogulid opilionids. Its broad prosoma–opisthosoma junction could be interpreted as a synapomorphy for Plesiosiro + Opiliones, but this character is not unique to these orders. Alternatively, Plesiosiro has a large, ventral opisthosomal sclerite. This is interpreted here as a genital operculum, a synapomorphy for Tetrapulmonata, and Plesiosiro is tentatively referred to this clade. Based on the synapomorphies of a divided sternum and subdivided telotarsi a relationship of the form: (Plesiosiro (Amblypygi (Thelyphonida + Schizomida))) is proposed.

Keywords

AmblypygiarthropodCoal MeasuresCoseleyfossilOpilionesphylogenysystematicsThelyphonida
Type
Research Article
Information
Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of The Royal Society of Edinburgh , Volume 90 , Issue 1 , 1999 , pp. 29 - 47
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Beall, B. S. & Labandeira, C. C. 1990. Macroevolutionary patterns of the Chelicerata and Tracheata. In Culver, S. J. (ed.) Arthropod Paleobiology, Short Courses in Paleontology, No. 3, 257-84. Knoxville: The Paleontological Society.Google Scholar
Crowson, R. A., Rolfe, W. D. I., Smart, J., Waterston, C. D, Willey, E. C. & Wooton, R. J. 1967. Arthropoda: Chelicerata, Pycnogonida, Palaeoisopus, Myriapoda and Insecta. In The Fossil Record, 499–543. London: Geological Society of London.Google Scholar
Delle Cave, L. & Simonetta, A. M. 1991. Early Palaeozoic arthropods and problems of arthropod phylogeny; with some notes on taxa of doubtful affinities. In Conway-Morris, S. & Simonetta, A. M. (eds) The Early Evolution of Metazoa and the Significance of Problematic Taxa, 189–244. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dubinin, V. B. 1962. Class Arachnida. In Rohdendorf, B. B. (ed.) Fundamentals of Paleontology, Volume 9, Arthropoda, Tracheata, Chelicerata, 723–807. Osnovy Paleontologii. 1991 English translation, Washington DC: Smithsonian Institution Libraries.Google Scholar
Dunlop, J. A. 1996a. Systematics of the fossil arachnids. Revue suisse de Zoologie hors serie, 173–84.Google Scholar
Dunlop, J. A. 1996b. Evidence for a sister group relationship between Ricinulei and Trigonotarbida. Bulletin of the British Arachnological Society 10, 193–204.Google Scholar
Dunlop, J. A. 1996c. Aracnidos fosiles (con exclusion de Aranas y Escorpiones). In Melic, A. (ed.) Volumen Monografico: PaleoEntomologia. Boletin de la Sociedad Entomologica Aragonesa 16, 77–92.Google Scholar
Dunlop, J. A. 1997. Palaeozoic arachnids and their significance for arachnid phylogeny. Proceedings of the 16th European Colloquium of Arachnology, 65–82. Siedlce: Wyzsza Szkota Rolniczo-Pedagogiczna.Google Scholar
Dunlop, J. A. & Horrocks, C. A. 1996. A new Upper Carboniferous whip scorpion (Arachnida: Uropygi) with a revision of the British Carboniferous Uropygi. Zoologischer Anzeiger 234, 293–306.Google Scholar
Dunlop, J. A. & Horrocks, C. A. 1997. Phalangiotarbid arachnids from the Coal Measures of Lancashire, UK. Geological Magazine 134, 369–81.Google Scholar
Dunlop, J. A. & Poschmann, M. 1997. On the Emsian (Lower Devonian) arthropods of the Rhenische Schiefergebirge: 1. Xenarachne, an enigmatic arachnid from Willwerath, Germany. Pala'ontologische Zeitschrift 71, 231–6.Google Scholar
Dunlop, J. A. & Selden, P. A. 1997. The early history and phylogeny of the chelicerates. In Fortey, R. A. & Thomas, R. H. (eds) Arthropod Relationships, Systematics Association Special Volume Series 55, 221–35. London: Chapman & Hall.Google Scholar
Firstman, B. 1973. The relationship of the chelicerate arterial system to the evolution of the endosternite. The Journal of Arachnology 1, 1–154.Google Scholar
Grasshoff, M. 1978. A model of the evolution of the main chelicerate groups. Symposium of the Zoological Society, London 42, 273–84.Google Scholar
der, Hammen L. van 1977. A new classification of the Chelicerata. Zoologische Mededeelingen, Leiden 51, 307–19.Google Scholar
Hammen, L. van der 1989. An Introduction to Comparative Arachnology. The Hague: SPB Academic Publishing.Google Scholar
Kraus, O. & Kraus, M. 1993. Divergent transformation of chelicerae and original arrangement of eyes in spiders (Arachnida, Araneae). Memoirs of the Queensland Museum 33, 579–84.Google Scholar
Manning, P. L. & Dunlop, J. A. 1995. The respiratory organs of eurypterids. Palaeontology 38, 287–97.Google Scholar
Petrunkevitch, A. I. 1913. A monograph of the terrestrial Palaeozoic Arachnida of North America. Transactions of the Connecticut Academy of Arts and Sciences 18, 1–137.Google Scholar
Petrunkevitch, A. I. 1949. A study of Palaeozoic Arachnida. Transactions of the Connecticut Academy of Arts and Sciences 37,69–315.Google Scholar
Petrunkevitch, A. I. 1953. Paleozoic and Mesozoic Arachnida of Europe. Memoirs of the Geological Society of America S3, 1–122.Google Scholar
Petrunkevitch, A. I. 1955. Arachnida. In Moore, R. C. (ed.) Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Pt. P, Arthropoda 2, 44–175. Lawrence: Geological Society of America and University of Kansas Press.Google Scholar
Pocock, R. I. 1911. A monograph of the terrestrial Carboniferous Arachnida of Great Britain. Monographs of the Palaeontographical Society. London: The Palaeontographical Society.Google Scholar
Ramsbottom, W. H. C, Calver, M. A., Eagar, R. M. C, Hodson, F., Holliday, D. W., Stubblefield, C. J. & Wilson, R. B. 1978. A correlation of Silesian rocks in the British Isles. Special Reports of the Geological Society, London 10, 182.Google Scholar
Savory, T. H. 1964. The Arachnida, 2nd edn. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Schram, F. R. 1979. British Carboniferous Malacostraca. Fieldiana Geology 40, iixx + 129 pp.Google Scholar
Selden, P. A. 1993a. Arthropoda (Aglaspidida, Pycnogonida and Chelicerata). In Benton, M. J. (ed.) The Fossil Record 2, 297–320. London: Chapman & Hall.Google Scholar
Selden, P. A. 1993b. Fossil arachnids—recent advances and future prospects. Memoirs of the Queensland Museum 33, 389–400.Google Scholar
Selden, P. A. & Dunlop, J. A. 1998. Fossil taxa and relationships of chelicerates. In Edgecombe, G. (ed.) Arthropod Fossils and Phylogeny, 303–31. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Selden, P. A., Shear, W. A. & Bonamo, P. M. 1991. A spider and other arachnids from the Devonian of New York, and reinterpretations of Devonian Araneae. Palaeontology 34, 241–81.Google Scholar
Shear, W. A. & Kukalova-Peck, J. 1990. The ecology of Paleozoic terrestrial arthropods: the fossil evidence. Canadian Journal of Zoology 68, 1807–34.Google Scholar
Shear, W. A. & Selden, P. A. 1986. Phylogenetic relationships of the Trigonotarbida, an extinct order of arachnids. Adas X Congress International Arachnology Jaca/Espana, 1986 1, 3937.Google Scholar
Shear, W. A., Selden, P. A., Rolfe, W. D. I., Bonamo, P. M. & Grierson, J. D. 1987. New terrestrial arachnids from the Devonian of Gilboa, New York (Arachnida, Trigonotarbida). American Museum Novitates 2901, 1–74.Google Scholar
Shultz, J. W. 1990. Evolutionary morphology and phylogeny of Arachnida. Cladistics 6, 1–38.Google Scholar
Shultz, J. W. 1993. Muscular anatomy of the giant whipscorpion Mastigoproctus giganteus (Lucus) (Arachnida: Uropygi) and its evolutionary significance. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 108, 335 65.Google Scholar
Shultz, J. W. in press. Muscular anatomy of a whipspider, Phrynus longipes (Pocock) (Arachnida: Amblypygi) and its evolutionary significance. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society.Google Scholar
Waterlot, G. 1949. Les arachnides fossilcs. In Grasse, P.-P. (ed.) Traite de Zoologie, Anatomie Systematique, Biologic Tome VI, Onycophores—Tardigrades—Arthropodes— Trilobitomorphes—Chelicerates, 893–905. Paris: Masson et Cie.Google Scholar
Waterlot, G. 1953. Classe des Arachnides. In Piveteau, J. (ed.) Traite de Paleontologie, Tome III, Onycophores, Arthropodes, Echinodermes, Stomocordes, 555–84. Paris: Masson et Cie.Google Scholar
Weygoldt, P. 1998. Evolution and systematics of the Chelicerata. Experimental and Applied Acarology 22, 63–79.Google Scholar
Weygoldt, P. & Paulus, H. F. 1979. Untersuchungen zur Morphologic, Taxonomie und Phylogenie der Chelicerata. Zeitschrift fur zoologische Systematik und Evolutionsforschung 17, 85116; 177-200.Google Scholar
Wheeler, W. C. & Hayashi, C. Y. 1998. The phylogeny of the extant chelicerate orders. Cladislics 14, 173–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilson, R. S. 1965. The pedicel of the spider Heteropoda venatoria. Journal of Zoology 147, 38–45.Google Scholar