Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T06:09:26.130Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A new haplolepid fauna (Osteichthyes: Actinopterygii) from the Lower Coal Measures of Scotland: Westphalian A; Langsettian, Carbonicola communis chronozone (Bashkirian)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2015

Francis M. Elliott*
Affiliation:
Scottish Universities Environmental Research Centre (SUERC), Rankine Avenue, Scottish Enterprise Technology Park, East Kilbride G75 0QF, Scotland, UK.

Abstract

Seven new species and one new genus of the family Haplolepidae (Actinopterygii: Palaeonisciformes) are described from new material obtained from the Drumgray coal shales, North Lanarkshire: Westphalian A (Bashkirian): Protohaplolepis isabellae; Protohaplolepis limnades; Protohaplolepis traquairi; Parahaplolepis alexandrae; Parahaplolepis elenae; Pyritocephalus youngii and Millerolepis eleionomae. The discovery of these new taxa increases the number of haplolepid species found in Europe to 16, thus producing a faunal count more than comparable to that of North America. This high concentration of haplolepid remains in limnic deposits is also a strong indication that these fish were not only adapted to a coastal paralic basin, but also well-adapted to a freshwater brackish environment. A comprehensive description of the skull roof morphology, including a short description of some of the larger dermal bones, is given of seven new haplolepid species obtained from the coal shale tips at Wester Bracco and Shotts in North Lanarkshire. In consequence, a revised table of the stratigraphical distribution of the Haplolepidae in Europe is provided. Furthermore, the new genus Millerolepis is assigned to the subfamily Parahaplolepinae and the generic position of the problematic Haplolepis attheyi from Newsham, Northumberland is discussed, with the taxonomic position of Protohaplolepis proposed.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Society of Edinburgh 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

10. References

Baird, D. 1962. A haplolepid fish fauna in the early Pennsylvanian of Nova Scotia. Palaeontology 5, 2229.Google Scholar
Baird, D. 1978. Studies on Carboniferous freshwater fishes. American Museum Novitates 2641, 122, figs 1–9.Google Scholar
Cope, E. D. 1871. Observations on the systematic relations of the fishes. American Naturalist 5, 579–93.Google Scholar
Fritsch, A. 1893. Fauna der Gaskohle und der Kalksteineder Permformation Böhmens 3(2), 1132, figs 189–310, pls 91–132. Prague: F. Rivnác. (NB: whole volume is dated 1895.)Google Scholar
Gardiner, B. G. & Schaeffer, B. 1989. Interrelationships of lower actinopterygian fishes. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 97, 135–87.Google Scholar
Huber, P. 1992. Pyritocephalus lowneyae n. sp., the youngest haplolepiform (Pisces: Actinopterygii) from the Pennsylvanian of Central New Mexico. New Mexico Bureau of Mines and Mineral Resources Bulletin 138, 183–87.Google Scholar
Lowney, K. A. 1980. A revision of the Family Haplolepidae (Actinopterygii, Paleonisciformes) from Linton, Ohio, (Westphalian D, Pennsylvanian). Journal of Palaeontology 54, 942–53.Google Scholar
Lowney, K. A. 1983. The earliest known (Namurian A,E1) haplolepids (Osteichthyes: Actinopterygii). Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh: Earth Sciences 74, 6978.Google Scholar
Moy-Thomas, J. A. & Bradley Dyne, B. A. 1938. The Actinopterygian Fishes from the Lower Carboniferous of Glencartholm, Eskdale, Dumfriesshire. Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh 59, 437–80.Google Scholar
Newberry, J. S. 1856. Description of several new genera and species of fossil fishes from the Carboniferous strata of Ohio. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia 8, 97100.Google Scholar
Newberry, J. S. 1857. Letter to the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia 9(1858, for 1857), 150.Google Scholar
Newbery, J. S. 1873. Descriptions of fossil fishes. Report of the Geological Survey of Ohio, part 1, section 2. Palaeontology 1, 245355.Google Scholar
Newberry, J. S. 1889. The Paleozoic fishes of North America. United States Geological Survey Monograph 16. 340 pp; 53 Plates. Washington: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Poplin, C. M. 1997. Le premier Haplolepiforme (Pisces, Actinopterygii) découvert en France (Carbonifère supérieur du bassin de Blanxy–Montceau, Massif Central). Compte rendu hebdomadaire des séances de l'Académie des Sciences Paris 324(2), 5977.Google Scholar
Štamberg, S. 1978. New data on Pyritocephalus sculptus (Pisces) from the Carboniferous of the Plzeň Basin. In Pokorny, V. (ed.) Proceedings of the 1977 Paleontological Conference, 275–88. Prague: Charles University.Google Scholar
Traquair, R. H. 1914. Ganoid Fishes of British Carboniferous Formations. Part I. Palaeoniscidae, Number 7. Monograph of the Palaeontographical Society 66(Issue 331), ivi, 181–86. London: The Palaeontographical Society.Google Scholar
Westoll, T. S. 1944. The Haplolepidae, a new family of Late Carboniferous bony fishes. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 83, 1122.Google Scholar
Woodward, A. S. 1891. Catalogue of the fossil fishes in the British Museum (Natural History), Part II, containing the Elasmobranchii (Acanthodii). Holocephali, Ichthyodorulites, Ostracodermi, Dipnoi, and Teleostomi (Crossopterygii and chondrostean Actinopterygii). XLIV+567 pp. London: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar