Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T07:16:37.308Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

IX.—A Contribution to the Study of the Scottish Skull.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 July 2012

Matthew Young  and
Thomas H. Bryce
Matthew Young
Affiliation:
Senior Demonstrator in Anatomy, University of Glasgow.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The present communication is based principally on the results of a series of investigations into the form, dimensions, and characters of the skulls that comprise the unique collection which has been located in the Anatomy Department at the University of Glasgow for a number of years, and of which no account has yet been published. We owe the collection and preservation of this large and valuable series of crania—comprising over 700 specimens—to the zeal of Mr W. K. HUTTON, Lecturer in Anatomy, Queen Margaret College, University of Glasgow, to whom I am much indebted for permission to continue the work begun, but given up, by him. I am very grateful to Professor BRYCE for assistance and much encouragement during the progress of the research.

Type
Research Article
Information
Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of The Royal Society of Edinburgh , Volume 51 , Issue 2 , 1917 , pp. 347 - 454
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1917

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

(1)SirTurner, WM., “A Contribution to the Craniology of the People of Scotland,” Trans. Roy. Soc. Edin., vol. xl, part iii.Google Scholar
(2)SirTurner, WM., “Challenger” Reports: Zoology, “Human Crania,” part xxix, 1884.Google Scholar
(3)Bartel, Paul, Über Geschlechtsunterschiede am Schädel, Inaug. Diss., Berlin, 1897 (quoted by Robertson, ).Google Scholar
(4)Ellis, Havelock, Man and Woman, Contemporary Science Series.Google Scholar
(5)Klaatsch, Herman, “Memoir on the Skull of the Australian Aboriginal,” Reports from Path. Lab. of the Lunacy Dept., New South Wales, vol. i, part iii, 1908 (quoted by Robertson, ).Google Scholar
(6)Warren, Ernest, “An Investigation on the Variability of the Human Skeleton, with especial reference to the Naquada Race,” Phil. Trans., B, vol. clxxxix.Google Scholar
(7)Parsons, F. G., “Report on the Hythe Crania,” Journ. Roy. Anthropol. Inst., vol. xxxviii, 1908.Google Scholar
(8)Pearson, Karl, The Chances of Death, vol. i.Google Scholar
(9)Robertson, A. W., “Craniological Observations on the Lengths, Breadths, and Heights of One Hundred Australian Aboriginal Crania,” Proc. Roy. Soc. Edin., vol. xxxi, part i.Google Scholar
(10)Bryce, T. H., Quain's Anatomy, vol. iv, part i, “Osteology and Arthrology,” 1914.Google Scholar
(11)Büchner, L. W. G., “An Investigation of Fifty-two Tasmanian Crania by KLAATSCH'S Craniotrigono-metrical Methods,” Proc. Roy. Soc. Vict., vol. xxv, N.S., part i.Google Scholar
(12)Macdonnell, W. R., “A Study of the Variation and Correlation of the Human Skull, with special reference to English Crania,” Biometrika, vol. iii, p. 191.Google Scholar
(13)Pearson, K., and Lee, Alice, “Data for the Problem of Evolution in Man,” “A First Study of the Correlation of the Human Skull,” Trans. Roy. Soc., A, vol. cxcvi, 1901.Google Scholar
(14)Ripley, W. Z., The Races of Europe, 1900.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(15)Cleland, John, (a) “An Inquiry into the Variations of the Human Skull, particularly in the Antero-Posterior Direction,” Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. Land., vol. clx, 1870; (b) “On the Form of the Human Skull at Different Ages and in Different Nationalities,” Memoirs and Memoranda in Anat., 1889.Google Scholar
(16)Welcker, H., Arch. f. Anthropol. (quoted by Cleland).Google Scholar
(17)Ecker, , Arch. f. Anthropol. (quoted by Cleland).Google Scholar
(18)Schwerz, Franz, “Untersuchungen über das Verhältnis von Frontal-parietal und Occipitalsehne zur Schädelbasislange,” Arch. f. Anthropol., N.F., 9.Google Scholar
(19)Pearson, Karl, “Mathematical Contributions to the Theory of Evolution, Regression, Heredity, and Panmixia,” Phil. Trans., vol. clxxxvii, A.Google Scholar
(20)Galton, Francis, Biometrika, vol. i, also National Inheritance.Google Scholar
(21)Quetelet, , Lettres sur la Théorie des Probabilités, 1846 (quoted by ROBERTSON).Google Scholar
(22)Fawcett, C. D., and Lee, Alice, “A Second Study of the Variation and Correlation of the Human Skull, with special reference to the Naquada Crania,” Biometrika, vol. i, p. 408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(23)Pearson, Karl, Proc. Roy. Soc., vol. lx.Google Scholar
(24)Stieda, , “Über die Anwendung der Wahrscheinlichkeitsrechnung in der Anthropologischen,” Statist. Arch. f. Anthropol., Bd. xiv.Google Scholar
(25)Keith, A., “A Description of a New Craniometer,” etc., Journ. of Anat. and Physiol., vol. xliv.Google Scholar
(26)Boas, Franz, “Heredity in Head Form,” Amer. Anthropol., vol. i.Google Scholar
(27)Tschepourkowsky, E., “Contributions to the Study of Interracial Correlation,” Biometrika, vol. iv, p. 286.Google Scholar
(28)Berry, R. J. A., and Robertson, A. W., “A Biometrical Study of the Relative Degree of Purity of Race of the Tasmanian, Australian, and Papuan,” Proc. Roy. Soc. Edin., vol. xxxi, part i.Google Scholar
(29)Huxley, T. H., “On Two Widely-contrasted Forms of the Human Cranium,” Journ. Anat. and Physiol., vol. i.Google Scholar
(32)Pearson, Karl, “Homogeneity and Heterogeneity in Collections of Crania,” Craniological Notes, Biometrika, vol. ii.Google Scholar
(33)Darwin, Chas., Animals and Plants under Domestication, vol. ii.Google Scholar
(35)Brewster, E. T., Proc. Boston Soc. Nat. Hist., vol. xxix.Google Scholar
(36)Virchow, , “Über den Cretinismus, etc.,” Gesamm. Abhandl. Frankfurt, 1856 (quoted from Topinard by Professor THOMSON).Google Scholar
(37)Thomson, A., “A Consideration of some of the More Important Factors concerned in the Production of Man's Cranial Form,” Journ. Anthropol. Inst. Lond., N.S., 6.Google Scholar
(38)Cross, K. S., “On a Numerical Determination of the Relative Positions of certain Biological Types in the Evolutionary Scale, and of the Relative Values of various Cranial Measurements and Indices as Criteria,” Proc. Roy. Soc. Edin., vol. xxxi, part i, No. 4.Google Scholar
(40)Berry, R. J. A., and Robertson, A. W., “Dioptrographic Tracings in Four Normæ of Fifty-two Tasmanian Crania,” Trans. Roy. Soc. Victoria, vol. v, part i, 1909.Google Scholar
(40A)Berry, R. J. A., and Robertson, A. W., “Dioptrographic Tracings in Three Normæ of Ninety Australian Aboriginal Crania,” Trans. Roy. Soc. Victoria, vol. vi, 1914.Google Scholar
(41)Falkenbürger, F., “Zur Craniotrigonometrie,” Anthrop. Gesellsch., Nos. 7–12, 1912.Google Scholar
(42)Bolk, L., (a) “On the Position and Displacement of the Foramen magnum in the Primates,” Proc. Kon. Akad. Amsterdam, No. 12; (b) “On the Slope of the Foramen magnum in the Primates,” as above.Google Scholar
(43)Klaatsch, H., “Kraniomorphologie und Kraniotrigonometrie,” Arch. f. Anthropol., N.F., 8.Google Scholar
(44)Wetzel, G., “Die obersten Halswirbel und die Beziehung ihrer Ebenen zu denen des Schädels beim Menschen und den Anthropoiden,” Zeitschr. f. Morph. u. Anthropol., Bd. xiii, Heft l, 1910.Google Scholar
(45)Schwalbe, G. (quoted by TURNER in 47, b).Google Scholar
(46)Sollas, W. J., “On the Cranial and Facial Characters of the Neanderthal Race,” Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc., B, vol. cxcix, 1907.Google Scholar
(47)SirTurner, WM., (a) “The Craniology, Racial Affinities, and Descent of the Aboriginals of Tasmania,” Trans. Roy. Soc. Edin., vol. xlvi, 1908; (b) “The Aborigines of Tasmania,” Trans. Roy. Soc. Edin., vol. xlvii, 1910.Google Scholar
(48)Cunningham, D. J., “Anthropological Essays presented to Professor TYLOR” (quoted by TURNER in 47, b).Google Scholar
(49)Klaatsch, H., “Das Gesichtsskelet der Neanderthalrasse und der Australier,” Verhandl. anat. Ges., Berlin, 1908.Google Scholar
(50)Berry, R. J. A., and Robertson, A. W., “The Place in Nature of the Tasmanian Aboriginal as deduced from a Study of his Calvarium,” Proc. Roy. Soc. Edin., vol. xxxi, part i (No. 3).Google Scholar
(51)Huxley, T. H., Man's Place in Nature.Google Scholar
(52)Schwalbe, G., “Studien über Pithecanthropus erectus, Dubois,” Zeitschr. f. Morphol. u. Anthropol., Bd. i, 1899.Google Scholar
(53)Schwalbe, G., “Der Neanderthalschädel, Bouner Jahrbucher, Heft 106, 1901.Google Scholar
(54)Duckworth, L. W. H., Morphology and Anthropology, Cambridge, 1904.Google Scholar
(55)Thomson, A., and M'iver, R., The Ancient Races of the Thebaid, Oxford, 1905.Google Scholar
(56)Fürst, C. M., “Einiges über anthropologische Winkelmessungen und über ein Instrument für Winkel- und Indexbestimmungen,” Zeit. f. Morph. u. Anthrop., Bd. ix, 1906.Google Scholar
(57)Anderson, R. J., “Observation on the Thickness of the Human Skull,” Dublin Journ. Medical Science, vol. lxxiv, 1882.Google Scholar
(58)Sergi, G., The Mediterranean Race.Google Scholar
(59)Berry, R. J. A., and Robertson, A. W., “The Place in Nature of the Tasmanian Aboriginal as deduced from a Study of his Calvaria,” Proc. Roy. Soc. Edin., vol. xxxiv, part ii, 1914.Google Scholar
(60)Büchner, L. W. G., “A Study of the Prognathism of the Tasmanian Aboriginal,” Proc. Roy. Soc. Vict., vol. xxv, N.S., part i.Google Scholar
(61)Büchner, L. W. G., “A Study of the Curvatures of the Tasmanian Aboriginal Cranium,” Proc. Roy. Soc. Edin., vol. xxxiv, part ii, 1914.Google Scholar
(62)Schuster, E. H. J., “The Long-barrow and Round-barrow Skulls in the Collection of the Department of Comparative Anatomy, The Museum, Oxford,” Biometrika, vol. iv.Google Scholar
(63)Thurnam, J., “On the Two Principal Forms of Ancient British and Gaulish Skulls,” Mem. Anthropol. Soc. Lond., vol. i.Google Scholar