Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T09:02:28.533Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Experimental and computational aspects of overbank floodplain flow

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 November 2011

D. A. Ervine
Affiliation:
Department of Civil Engineering, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8LT, U.K.
J. Ellis
Affiliation:
Department of Civil Engineering, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, U.K.

Abstract

The propagation of a flood wave through a river system is influenced by a complex process of energy dissipation. This is especially the case when overbank flows are a feature of the flood movement, producing more defined lateral movement of flow and high rates of fluid shear at the main channel/floodplain interface. The present paper concentrates on the physical and numerical modelling of river flows during overbank flow. A general description of the flow behaviour is outlined, including an investigation into the nature of the shear interaction between channel and floodplain. The paper advances a method for determining energy losses for the case of meandering channels with overbank flow and a method of sub-dividing the floodway for stage-discharge prediction. A state-of-the-art study of numerical modelling of flood propagation is outlined, including selected case histories on how the overbank flow situation has been handled to date, as well as comment on the current means of representing energy dissipation relying on calibration of the numerical model against observed field data.

Type
Engineering and applied hydrology
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baird, J. I. & Ervine, D. A. 1984. Resistance to flow in channels with overbank flood-plain flow. PROC 1ST INT CONF. CHANNELS AND CHANNEL CONTROL STRUCTURES, SOUTHAMPTON, 4–137–4–150.Google Scholar
Bhowmik, N. G. & Demissie, M. 1982. Carrying Capacity of Floodplains. J HYDRAUL DIV, AM SOC CIVIL ENG 108.Google Scholar
Chang, H. H. 1983. Energy expenditure in curved open channels. J HYDRAUL ENG, AM SOC CIVIL ENG 109, 1012–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cunge, J. A., Holly, F. M. & Verwey, A. 1980. Practical aspects of computational river hydraulics. MONOGR SURV WATER RES ENG 3.Google Scholar
Ervine, D. A. & Baird, J. I. 1982. Rating curves for rivers with overbank flow. PROC INST CIVIL ENG 73, 465–72.Google Scholar
James, M. & Brown, R. J. 1977. Geometric parameters that influence floodplain flow. Vicksburg, Miss.: U.S. Army Engineer Waterways Experimental Station, Research Report H-77–1.Google Scholar
Kikkawa, H., Ikeda, S. & Kitagawa, A. 1976. Flow and bed topography in curved open channels. J HYDRAUL DIV, AM SOC CIVIL ENG 102, 1327–42.Google Scholar
Knight, D. W., Demetriou, J. D. & Hamed, M. E. 1983. Hydraulic analysis of channels with floodplains. PROC INT CONF HYDROL ASPECTS OF FLOODS, 129–44. Bedford: B.H.R.A. Fluid Engineering.Google Scholar
Knight, D. W. & Lai, C. J. 1985. Turbulent flow in compound channels and ducts. INT SYMP REFINED FLOW MODELLING AND TURBULENCE MEASUREMENTS, Iowa.Google Scholar
Krishnappan, B. G. & Lam Lau, Y. 1986. Turbulence modelling of floodplain flows. J HYDRAUL ENG 112, 251–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morisawa, M. 1985. Rivers—form and process. London and New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Myers, W. R. C. 1978. Momentum Transfer in a Compound Channel. J HYDRAUL RES 16.Google Scholar
Myers, W. R. C. 1984. Frictional resistance in Channels with floodplains. PROC 1ST INT CONF CHANNELS AND CHANNEL CONTROL STRUCT SOUTHAMPTON, 4–73 – 4–87.Google Scholar
Pasche, E. & Rouvé, G. 1985. Overbank flow with vegetatively roughened floodplains. J HYDRAUL ENG 111, 1262–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prinos, P., Townsend, R. & Tavoularis, S. 1985. Structure of turbulence in Compound channel flows. J HYDRAUL ENG 111, 1246–61.Google Scholar
Radojkovic, M. 1976. Mathematical Modelling of Rivers with Floodplains. 3RD ANN SYMP WATERWAYS, HARBOURS AND COASTAL ENG DIV AM SOC CIVIL ENG, Vol. 1, Rivers.Google Scholar
Rajaratnam, N. & Ahmadi, R. M. 1981. Hydraulics of Channels with Floodplains. J HYD RES 19, 4360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodi, W., Celik, I., Demuren, A. O. & Keller, R. J. 1983. New developments in the area of computer applications in Hydraulics and water resources. SPEC PRESENTATION RECENT DEVEL, 20TH INT ASSOC HYDRAUL RES CONGR MOSCOW.Google Scholar
Samuels, P. G. 1985. Modelling of river and floodplain flow using the finite element method. Wallingford: Report No. SR 61, H.R.L.Google Scholar
Sellin, R. H. J. 1964. A Laboratory Investigation into the Interaction between the Flow in the Channel of a River and that over its Floodplain. LA HOUILLE BLANCHE 7.Google Scholar
Toebes, G. H. & Sooky, A. A. 1967. Hydraulics of Meandering Rivers with Floodplains. J WATERWAYS AND HARBOURS DIV AM SOC CIVIL ENG 93, 213–36.Google Scholar
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 1956. Hydraulic capacity of meandering channels in straight floodways. TECH MEMO 2–429. WATERWAYS EXP STATION, VICKSBURG, MISSOURI.Google Scholar
Vreugdenhil, C. B. & Wijbenga, J. H. A. 1982. Computation of flow patterns in Rivers. J HYDROL DIV AM SOC CIVIL ENG 8.Google Scholar
Wormleaton, P. R., Allen, J. & Hadjipanos, P. 1982. Discharge Assessment in Compound channel flow. J HYDRAUL DIV AM SOC CIVIL ENG 108, 975–94.Google Scholar
Wormleaton, P. R. 1986. Some results of a preliminary investigation of flow in trapezoidal main channel and floodplain. SERC FLOOD CHANNELS WORKING PARTY.Google Scholar
Wright, R. R. & Carstens, M. R. 1970. Linear-Momentum Flux to Overbank Sections. J HYDRAUL DIV AM SOC CIVIL ENG 96.Google Scholar
Yen, B. C. & Yen, C. L. 1983. Flood flow over meandering channels. RIVERS MEANDERING CONF, 554–61.Google Scholar