Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T19:31:06.715Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A deep resistivity sounding at Rookhope, Northern England

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 July 2012

G. M. Habberjam  and
C. Thanassoulas
G. M. Habberjam
Affiliation:
Department of Earth Sciences, University of Leeds
C. Thanassoulas
Affiliation:
Department of Earth Sciences, University of Leeds
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Synopsis

A method of conducting a resistivity sounding, up to a maximum spacing of 5 kilometres, is described. By conducting measurements, in a symmetrical fashion, about the sounding centre and in two perpendicular directions, it is possible to obtain results which are relatively insensitive to the orientation of the electrode array used and entirely related to the local area around the sounding centre. By choice of the progression of spacing used, it is also possible to express the results in terms of resistivity measures suitable for subsequent interpretation.

A resistivity sounding curve, conducted in this manner at Rookhope, shows the existence a highly resistive basement at interpreted depths which are in reasonable accord with the known depth to the Weardale granite in this area.

Type
Research Article
Information
Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of The Royal Society of Edinburgh , Volume 70 , Issue 5-9 , 1979 , pp. 171 - 179
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1979

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alfano, L., 1974. A modified geoelectrical procedure using polar-dipole arrays—an example of application to deep exploration. Geophys. Prospect., 22, 510–525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berdichevskii, M. M. and Zagarmistr, A. A., 1958. Problems of interpretation of bilateral dipole electrical soundings Prikl. Geofiz., 19, 57–108.Google Scholar
Bott, M. H. P., 1967. Geophysical investigations of the northern Pennine basement rocks. Proc. Yorks. Geol. Soc., 36, 139–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunham, K. C., Dunham, A. C., Hodge, B. L. and Johnson, G. A. L., 1965. Granite beneath Viséan sediments with mineralisation at Rookhope, northern Pennines. Q. Jl Geol. Soc. Lond., 121, 383–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ghosh, D. P., 1971. The application of linear filter theory to the direct interpretation of geoelectrical resistivity sounding measurements. Geophys. Prospect., 19, 192–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Habberjam, G. M. and Watkins, G. E., 1967. The use of a square configuration in resistivity prospecting. Geophys. Prospect., 15, 445–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Habberjam, G. M., 1972. The point of assignment of an earth-resistance measurement. Geoexploration, 10, 141–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Habberjam, G. M., 1975. Apparent resistivity, anisotropy and strike measurements. Geophys. Prospect., 23, 211–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keller, G. V., 1966. Dipole method for deep resistivity studies. Geophysics, 31, 1088–1104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marsden, D., 1973. The automatic fitting of a resistivity sounding by a geometrical progression of depths. Geophys. Prospect., 21, 266–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Zijl, J. S. V., Hugo, P. L. V. and De Bellocq, J. H., 1970. Ultra deep Schlumberger sounding and crustal conductivity structure in South Africa. Geophys. Prospect., 18, 615–634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zohdy, A. A. R., 1969. The use of Schlumberger and equatorial soundings in groundwater investigations near El Paso, Texas. Geophysics, 34, 713–728.CrossRefGoogle Scholar