Archaeological Discovery and Research into the Layout of the Palaces and Ancestral Shrines of Han Dynasty Chang'an –A Comparative Essay on the Capital Cities of Ancient Chinese Kingdoms and Empires

Liu Qingzhu

doi:10.1017/S0362502800001814

Archaeological Discovery and Research into the Layout of the Palaces and Ancestral Shrines of Han Dynasty Chang'an –A Comparative Essay on the Capital Cities of Ancient Chinese Kingdoms and Empires

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 26 March 2015

Liu Qingzhu

Article contents

Extract
References

Get access

Rights & Permissions

Extract

The principal function of the ancient Chinese royal capital city was political. From the perspective of archaeology, the physical manifestation of this is primarily revealed through palace buildings and ancestral shrines. Chang’an was the capital city of the Western Han Empire. After extensive excavation and research into the sites of palatial structures and ancestral shrines of Han Dynasty Chang’an city, it is clear that the two are distinct in form. Also, comparative research into the layout of the palaces and ancestral shrines of Han Chang’an that have undergone excavation beside those palaces and shrines of the capital cities of the kingdoms of the pre-Qin era also reveals that the two architectural forms have clear differences. The difference in architectural form between palaces and ancestral shrines reflects the difference in function they performed, between rule through territorial authority and rule through kinship. From the side-by-side placement of palaces and ancestral shrines within the royal precincts of capital cities of the kingdom era (the pre-Qin period), to the separate placement of palaces and shrines in the capital cities of the imperial era (Qin-Han to Ming-Qing periods), as well as in the formation of the system centered on the royal palace, whereby the “ancestors occupy the left, while the altar of soil occupies the right,” the difference in the layout of palaces and ancestral shrines in the capital cities of the kingdom era and those of the imperial era clearly explains how the palace, which represents rule by territorial authority, and the ancestral shrine, which represents rule by kinship, wax and wane in the strength of their social function with the development of society and the change in societal configuration. Archaeological discovery and research into the architectural sites of palaces and ancestral shrines of Han Chang’an city reveals that the kingdom era of ancient Chinese society was a time for the integration of rule through kinship and rule through territorial authority, while from the Qin-Han period to the Ming-Qing era was a time of centralized imperial power, where rule by territorial authority was primary, and rule through kinship was secondary.

Type: Research Article
Information: Early China , Volume 31 , 2007 , pp. 113 - 143

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0362502800001814 [Opens in a new window]
Copyright: Copyright © Society for the Study of Early China 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. For the Everlasting Palace excavations, see Han Chang'an cheng Weiyang Gong 1980–1989 nian kaogu fajue baogao 1980–1989 [Excavation report of the 1980 to 1989 seasons at the Everlasting Palace of Han-period Chang'an city], ed. yanjiusuo, Zhongguo shehui kexueyuan kaogu , 2 vols. (Beijing: Zhongguo dabaike quanshu, 1996)Google Scholar.

2. “Han Chang'an cheng Changle Gong erhao jianzhu yizhi fajue baogao” [Archaeological report of building no. 2 at the Palace of Lasting Joy complex of Han-period Chang'an], ed. Zhongguo shehui kexueyuan kaogu yanjiusuo gongzuodui, Han Chang'an cheng , Kaogu xuebao 2004.1 55–86 Google Scholar; “Han Chang'an cheng Changle Gong faxian lengshi yizhi” [The discovery of the ‘ice house' site at the Palace of Lasting Joy complex of Han-period Chang'an], ed. yanjiusuo, Zhongguo shehui kexueyuan kaogu gongzuodui, Han Chang'an cheng, Kaogu 2005.9, 3–6 Google Scholar; “Xi'an shi Han Chang'an cheng Changle Gong sihao jianzhu yizhi” [The site of building no. 4 at the Palace of Lasting Joy Complex of Han-period Chang'an in Xi'an municipality], ed. yanjiusuo, Zhongguo shehui kexueyuan kaogu gongzuodui, Han Chang'an cheng, Kaogu 2006.10,30–39 Google Scholar.

3. Qingzhu, Liu , “Han Chang'an cheng” [Han Chang'an City], Zhongguo kaoguxue nianjian 1986 (1986) [Yearbook of Chinese Archaeology (1986)] (Beijing: Wenwu, 1988), 224–25Google Scholar; Qingzhu, Liu and Yufang, Li , Han Chang'an cheng [Han Chang'an City] (Beijing: Wenwu, 2003), 109–10Google Scholar.

4. Gu, Ban , Han shu (Beijing: Zhonghua, 1962), 27A.1337 Google Scholar, relates, “On the guimao day of the first month of the third year of the Jianping reign of Emperor Ai, there was a fire in the Palace Hall of Vast Peace of the Cassia Palace complex. This was where the emperor's grandmother, Grand Empress Dowager Fu, resided” . In the “Basic Annals of Emperor Ai” in the Han shu, the same event is related as follows, “On the guimao day [of the first month of the third year of the Jianping era], there was a fire in the Primary Hall (Zheng Dian) of the Cassia Palace, where the Emperor's Grand Empress Dowager [Fu] lived” See Han shu, 11.341.

5. Han shu, 25B.1245.

6. Cf. the slightly different translation in Knechtges, David R., trans., Wen xuan or Selections of Refined Literature (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1982), 1.133 Google Scholar.

7. For the report of the excavation of the Cassia Palace, see Han Chang'an cheng Guigong 1996–2001 kaogu fajue baogao 1996–2001 [Excavation Report of the 1996–2001 seasons at the Cassia Palace of Han-period Chang'an city], ed. yanjiusuo, Zhongguo shehui kexueyuan kaogu et al. (Beijing: Wenwu, 2007)Google Scholar.

8. Sanfu huangtu jiaozheng [Critical edition of the Yellow Plan of the Three Capital Districts], ed. Zhi, Chen (Shaanxi renmin, 1980), 46 Google Scholar.

9. Chen Zhi Sanfu huangtu jiaozheng, 116.

10. Daoyuan, Li , Shuijing zhushu [Commentary on the Classic of Waterways ] (Nanjing: Jiangsu guji, 1989)Google Scholar, juan 19, 2.1599–1600.

11. Liu Qingzhu and Li Yufang, Han Chang'an cheng, 142.

12. Han shu, 43.2130n7.

13. Qingzhu, Liu and Yufang, Li Xi-Han shiyi ling [The eleven imperial mausolea of the Western Han] (Xi'an: Shaanxi renmin, 1987), 198–99Google Scholar.

14. Chen Zhi Sanfu huangtu, 117–18.

15. San Qin ji jizhu—Guanzhong ji jizhu [Compilation and annotation of the San Qin ji and the Guanzhong ji]. ed. Qingzhu, Liu (Xi'an: San Qin, 2006), 97 Google Scholar.

16. Shu dao [Way of Calligraphy], volume 3, p. 201. [Translator's note: I am unable to track down a more specific reference to this work.]

17. Han shu 43.2130; cf. the translation by Homer H. Dubs, History of the Former Han Dynasty, 1.185-605.

18. Erya [Approaching the Elegant] Sibu congkan ed., 3.4b (“Shi yan” Sibu beiyao ed., 2.4b.

19. This view is confirmed by a passage in the “Treatise on the Five Phases, A” (“Wuxing zhi” ) in the History of the Former Han. See Han shu, 27A.1338.

20. See Han shu, 4.121n1; Dubs, History of the Former Han Dynasty, 1.249–50n5.

21. See Song Minqiu Chang'an zhi [Chang'an Gazetteer], in Jingxuntang congshu Baibu congshu jicheng , part 3, volume 28: 3, no. 1–12,10.5b.

22. Han shu, 5.147n1; Dubs, History of the Former Han Dynasty, 1.321.

23. This is also explained by Ban Gu in the “Biography of the Empress of Emperor Yuan” (“Yuanhou zhuan” ) in the History of the Former Han. See Han shu, 98.4034.

24. Han Yangling bowuyuan [The Museum Park at the Han Yangling Mausoleum], ed. bowuyuan, Han Yangling (Beijing: Wenwu, 2006), 56 Google Scholar.

25. Han Duling lingyuan yizhi [The Duling mausoleum site of the Han], ed. yanjiusuo, Zhongguo shehui kexueyuan kaogu (Beijing: Kexue, 1993), 75 Google Scholar.

26. See the appropriate chapters in Liu and Li, Xi-Han shiyi ling.

27. See the references in Li Daoyuan, Shuijing zhu, 19,2.1593; Song Minqiu, Chang'an zhi, 5.2b.

28. See Liangjing xinji in Liangjing xinji jijiao—Daye zaji jijiao [Critical Editions of the Liangjing xinji and the Daye zaji] (Xi'an: San Qin, 2006), 55 Google Scholar.

29. See Guanzhong ji in San Qin jijizhu—Guanzhong ji jizhu, ed. Liu Qingzhu, 95-96; Song Minqiu, Chang'an zhi, 10.8b.

30. For the full report of these excavations, see Xi-Han lizhi jianzhu yizhi [Site of the Ritual Structures of the Western Han], ed. yanjiusuo, Zhongguo shehui kexueyuan kaogu (Beijing: Wenwu, 2003)Google Scholar.

31. Chen Zhi Sanfu huangtu, 46.

32. For the Anterior Hall of the Jianzhang Palace, see Han shu, 25B.1245; for the Palace of Sweet Springs, see Han jiuyi [Old Observances of the Han] in Han guan liuzhong [Six Types of Writing on Han Offices] (Beijing: Zhonghua, 1990), 98 Google Scholar.

33. See the appropriate sections in Liu and Li, Xi-Han shiyi ling.

34. See the report of the excavation of ritual structures in Xi-Han lizhi jianzhu yizhi, ed. Zhongguo shehui kexueyuan kaogu yanjiusuo; For Eastern Han Luoyang, see “Han Wei Luoyang cheng nanjiao de Lingtai yizhi [The Spiritual Terrace site in the southern suburbs of Han and Wei Luoyang city], ed. yanjiusuo, Zhongguo shehui kexueyuan kaogu gongzuodui, Luoyang, Kaogu 1978.1, 54–57 Google Scholar.

35. This phrase is quoted from the “Biography of Gao Tanglong” (“Gao Tanglong zhuan” ) of the Wei shu, . See Shou, Chen , Sanguo zhi [Record of the Three Kingdoms] (Beijing: Zhonghua, 1982), 711 Google Scholar.

36. For the report of the first two decades of excavation at Erlitou, see Yanshi Erlitou: 1959 nian — 1978 nian kaogu fajue baogao 1959 —1978 [Excavation report of the 1959 to 1978 seasons at the site of Erlitou in Yanshi], ed. yanjiusuo, Zhongguo shehui kexueyuan kaogu (Beijing: Zhongguo dabaike quanshu, 1999)Google Scholar.

37. See Hongxun, Yang , Gongdian kaogu tonglun [Comprehensive discussion of the archaeology of palace buildings] (Beijing: Zijincheng, 2001), 26–41 Google Scholar.

38. Wei, Han , “Majiazhuang Qin zongmiao jianzhu zhidu yanjiu” [Research into the architectural system of the Qin ancestral shrine at Majiazhuang], Wenwu 1985.2, 30–38 Google Scholar.

39. Zhongguo kaoguxue: Xia Shang juan [Chinese Archaeology: Xia and Shang volume], ed. yanjiusuo, Zhongguo shehui kexueyuan kaogu (Beijing: Zhongguo shehui kexue, 2003), 203–13Google Scholar.

40. Wang Xuerong , Du Jinpeng , et al., “Yanshi Shang cheng fajue Shang dai zaoqi jisi yizhi” [Excavation of a sacrificial site from the early Shang period at the Shang city at Yanshi], Zhonguo wenwu bao , August 5th, 2001, first edition.

41. See Jinpeng, Du and Xuerong, Wang, “Yanshi Shang cheng jinnian kaogu gongzuo yaolan: jinian Yanshi Shang cheng faxian ershi zhou nian” 20 [A survey of the important results of archaeological investigations of the Shang city at Yanshi: Commemorating the twentieth anniversary of the discovery of the Shang city at Yanshi] in Yanshi Shang cheng yizhi yanjiu [Research into the Shang city site at Yanshi] (Beijing: Kexue, 2004), 7–8 Google Scholar.

42. “Shaanxi sheng Fufeng xian Yuntang, Qizhen Xi-Zhou jianzhu jizhi 1999–2000 niandu fajue jianbao” 1999–2000 [Preliminary report of the 1999–2000 excavations seasons of the Western Zhou building foundations site at Yuntang village, Qizhen, in Fufeng County, Shaanxi Province], ed. kaogudui, Zhouyuan Kaogu 2002.9, 3–26 Google Scholar.

43. Xu Lianggao and Wang Wei , “Shaanxi Fufeng Yuntang Xi-Zhou jianzhu jizhi de chubu renshi” [Preliminary identification of the Western Zhou building foundation site in Yuntang village, Fufeng county, Shaanxi], Kaogu 2002.9, 27–35 Google Scholar.

44. “Fengxiang Majiazhuang yihao jianzhuqun yizhi fajue jianbao” [Preliminary report of the excavation of the building cluster site no. 1 from Majiazhuang, Fengxiang county], ed. sheng, Shaanxi kaogudui, Yong cheng , Wenwu 1985.2,1–29 Google Scholar.

45. Han Wei “Majiazhuang.”

46. For the full report of these excavations, see Qin du Xianyang kaogu baogao [Archaeological report of the Qin capital of Xianyang], ed. yanjiusuo, Shaanxi sheng kaogu (Beijing: Kexue, 2003)Google Scholar.