Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T06:02:50.946Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

THE “WORK” RACE DOES

Back to the Future

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 November 2008

Lawrence D. Bobo  and
Michael C. Dawson
Lawrence D. Bobo*
Affiliation:
Department of Sociology and of African and African American Studies, Harvard University
Michael C. Dawson
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science, University of Chicago
*
Professor Lawrence D. Bobo, Department of Sociology, William James Hall, 33 Kirkland Street, Cambridge, MA 02138. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The year 2008 has provided many opportunities to look back and take stock of what has and has not changed along the color line. Perhaps of greatest salience is that this year marks four decades of uneven progress since the tragic assassinations of Martin Luther King, Jr., and of Senator Robert F. Kennedy. It also marks the fortieth anniversary of the publication of what became known as the Kerner Commission report (National Advisory Commission on Civil Disorders 1968). The great sadness following those tragic deaths, and the somber tone set by the “two nations” declaration at the heart of the Kerner Report, call to mind an era of acute racial division, but also of steady struggle for change.

Type
EDITORIAL INTRODUCTION
Information
Du Bois Review: Social Science Research on Race , Volume 5 , Issue 1 , Spring 2008 , pp. 1 - 4
Copyright
Copyright © W.E.B. Du Bois Institute for African and African American Research 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bobo, Lawrence D. and Fox, Cybelle (2003). Race, Racism, and Discrimination: Bridging Problems, Methods, and Theory in Social Psychological Research. Social Psychology Quarterly, 66(4): 319–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bobo, Lawrence D. and Zubrinsky, Camille L. (1996). Attitudes on Residential Integration: Perceived Status Differences, Mere In-Group Preference, or Racial Prejudice? Social Forces, 74: 883–909.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brubaker, Rogers and Cooper, Frederick (2000). Beyond Identity. Theory and Society, 29: 1–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charles, Camille Z. (2006). Won't You Be My Neighbor?: Race, Class and Residence in Los Angeles. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Farley, Reynolds, Steeh, Charlotte, Krysan, Maria, Jackson, Tara, and Reeves, Keith (1994). Stereotypes and Segregation: Neighborhoods in the Detroit Area. American Journal of Sociology, 100(3): 750–780.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fields, Barbara J. (2001). Whiteness, Racism, and Identity. International Labor and Working Class History, no. 60: 48–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, David R. (2001). Why Are Whites and Blacks Averse to Black Neighborhoods? Social Science Research, 30(1): 100–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunt, Matthew O., Jackson, Pamela Braboy, Powell, Brian, and Steelman, Lala Carr (2000). Color Blind: The Treatment of Race and Ethnicity in Social Psychology. Social Psychology Quarterly, 63(4): 352–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Massey, Douglas S. and Denton, Nancy A. (1993). American Apartheid: Segregation and the Making of the Underclass. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
National Advisory Commission on Civil Disorders (1968). Report of the National Advisory Commission on Civil Disorders. New York: Bantam.Google Scholar
Swain, Carol M. (1993). Black Faces, Black Interests: The Representation of African Americans in Congress. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Tate, Katherine (2003). Black Faces in the Mirror: African Americans and Their Representatives in the U.S. Congress. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Zuberi, Tukufu (2001). Thicker than Blood: How Racial Statistics Lie. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar