Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T15:32:24.163Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

INEQUALITY AND U.S. SOCIETY

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 June 2010

Reynolds Farley  and
Lawrence D. Bobo
Reynolds Farley*
Affiliation:
Department of Sociology, University of Michigan
Lawrence D. Bobo*
Affiliation:
Department of Sociology and of African and African American Studies, Harvard University
*
Reynolds Farley, Population Studies Center, University of Michigan. 426 Thompson Street, Ann Arbor, MI 48106-1248. E-mail: [email protected]
Professor Lawrence D. Bobo, Department of Sociology, William James Hall, 33 Kirkland Street, Cambridge, MA 02138. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Among the advanced industrial nations, the United States has the most unequal distribution of income. Douglas Massey emphasizes that the purchasing power of households in the top five percent of the income distribution rose sharply from the early 1980s to 2000 while the purchasing power of those in the bottom twenty percent of the income distribution remained constant—proving a much larger economic gap between rich and poor households. This book summarizes an extensive array of studies from a variety of disciplines and cogently describes federal policies that promoted income disparity. Many sections of this book provide lucid information about the changing status of women, shifts in racial disparities, and the consequences of immigration from Mexico. It is not, however, a definitive book about inequality in this nation.

Type
State of the Discourse
Information
Du Bois Review: Social Science Research on Race , Volume 7 , Issue 1 , Spring 2010 , pp. 27 - 34
Copyright
Copyright © W.E.B. Du Bois Institute for African and African American Research 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Blumer, Herbert (1958). Prejudice as Group Position. Pacific Sociological Review, 1: 3–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bobo, Lawrence D. and Tuan, Mia (2006). Prejudice in Politics: Group Position, Public Opinion, and the Wisconsin Treaty Rights Dispute. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fiske, Susan T. (1998). Stereotyping, Prejudice, and Discrimination. In Gilbert, Daniel T., Fiske, Susan T., and Lindzey, Gardner (Eds.), The Handbook of Social Psychology, 4th ed., pp. 357–415. New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
Fiske, Susan T., Cuddy, Amy J. C., Glick, Peter, and Xu, Jun (2002). A Model of (Often Mixed) Stereotype Content: Competence and Warmth Respectively Follow from Perceived Status and Competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(6): 878–902.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackman, Mary R. (1994). The Velvet Glove: Paternalism and Conflict in Gender, Class, and Race Relations. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oliver, Melvin L. and Shapiro, Thomas M. (1995). Black Wealth/White Wealth: A New Perspective on Racial Inequality. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Sewell, William H. and Hauser, Robert M. (1980). The Wisconsin Longitudinal Study of Social and Psychological Factors in Aspirations and Achievements. In Kerckhoff, Alan C. (Ed.), Research in Sociology of Education and Socialization, Vol. 1, pp. 59–99. Greenwood, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
Telles, Edward E. and Ortiz, Vilma (2008). Generations of Exclusion: Mexican Americans, Assimilation, and Race. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Thernstrom, Stephan and Thernstrom, Abigail (1997). American in Black and White: One Nation, Indivisible. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Tilly, Charles (1998). Durable Inequality. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Western, Bruce (2006). Punishment and Inequality in America. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar