Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T06:59:53.618Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Utilization of Health Care Coalitions and Resiliency Forums in the United States and United Kingdom: Different Approaches to Strengthen Emergency Preparedness

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 December 2015

John Walsh  and
Allan Graeme Swan
John Walsh*
Affiliation:
Department of Radiation Oncology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee
Allan Graeme Swan
Affiliation:
MESH Coalition, Indianapolis, Indiana
*
Correspondence and reprint requests to John Walsh, Department of Radiation Oncology, Vanderbilt University, B902 TVC, 1301 Medical Center Drive, Nashville, TN 37232 (e-mail: [email protected]).
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The process for developing national emergency management strategies for both the United States and the United Kingdom has led to the formulation of differing approaches to meet similar desired outcomes. Historically, the pathways for each are the result of the enactment of legislation in response to a significant event or a series of events. The resulting laws attempt to revise practices and policies leading to more effective and efficient management in preparing, responding, and mitigating all types of natural, manmade, and technological hazards. Following the turn of the 21st century, each country has experienced significant advancements in emergency management including the formation and utilization of 2 distinct models: health care coalitions in the United States and resiliency forums in the United Kingdom. Both models have evolved from circumstances and governance unique to each country. Further in-depth study of both approaches will identify strengths, weaknesses, and existing gaps to meet continued and future challenges of our respective disaster health care systems. (Disaster Med Public Health Preparedness. 2016;10:161–164)

Keywords

capacity buildingcommunity health planningdisaster planningemergency preparednesspolicy making
Type
Policy Analysis
Information
Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness , Volume 10 , Issue 1 , February 2016 , pp. 161 - 164
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Disaster Medicine and Public Health, Inc. 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Wood-Heath, M, Annis, M. Working Together to Support Individuals in an Emergency of Disaster: Project Final Report. British Red Cross. https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/62671/working-together-in-emergency.pdf. Published May 2004. Accessed October 19, 2015.Google Scholar
2. Ekici, A, Ekici, S. Building Terrorism Resistant Communities: Together Against Terrorism. Amsterdam: IOS Press; 2009:130.Google Scholar
3. Wagstaff, RH. Terror Detentions and the Rule of Law: US and UK Perspectives. New York: Oxford University Press; 2014:48.Google Scholar
4. Bosher, L. ed. Hazards and the Built Environment: Attaining Built-in Resilience. New York: Routledge; 2008:282.Google Scholar
5. Department of Defense Support to Domestic Incidents. FEMA. gov website. http://www.fema.gov/pdf/emergency/nrf/DOD_SupportToDomesticIncidents.pdf. Published January 2008. Accessed October 10, 2015.Google Scholar
6. US Department of Homeland Security. National Response Framework. http://purl.access.gpo.gov/GPO/LPS91897. Published January 2008. Accessed October 19, 2015.Google Scholar
7. US Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response. Healthcare Preparedness Capabilities: National Guidance for Healthcare System Preparedness. http://www.phe.gov/preparedness/planning/hpp/reports/documents/capabilities.pdf. Published January 2012. Accessed October 19, 2015.Google Scholar
8. United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction. Peer Review Report United Kingdom 2013. Building Resilience to Disasters: Assessing the Implementation of the Hyogo Framework for Action (2005-2015). http://www.unisdr.org/files/32996_32996hfaukpeerreview20131.pdf. Published 2013. Accessed October 19, 2015.Google Scholar
9. Pitt, M. The Pitt Review: Learning Lessons From the 2007 floods. http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20080906001345/http://cabinetoffice.gov.uk/thepittreview/final_report.aspx. Last updated April 9, 2008. Accessed October 19, 2015.Google Scholar
10. Hanfling, D, Stephens, T. Building Healthcare Coalitions. Tennessee Department of Health Education Series. http://www.tha.com/files/2014/coalition-building-and-gap-analysis-presentation.pdf. Presented February 2014. Accessed October 19, 2015.Google Scholar
11. UK Department of Health. Arrangements for Health Emergency Preparedness, Resilience and Response from April 2013. https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/215083/dh_133597.pdf. Published April 2012. Accessed October 19, 2015.Google Scholar