Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T15:34:01.416Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Utility of Choice-Enhancing Language in Emergency Preparedness Messages: An Application of Psychological Reactance Theory

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 April 2020

Tobias Reynolds-Tylus  and
Andrea Martinez Gonzalez
Tobias Reynolds-Tylus*
Affiliation:
School of Communication Studies, James Madison University, Harrisonburg, VA
Andrea Martinez Gonzalez
Affiliation:
School of Communication Studies, James Madison University, Harrisonburg, VA
*
Correspondence and reprint requests to Tobias Reynolds-Tylus, School of Communication Studies, James Madison University, 54 Bluestone Drive, Harrisonburg, Virginia22807 (e-mail: [email protected]).
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective:

This study uses psychological reactance theory as a framework for designing effective emergency preparedness messages. Psychological reactance is the motivational state that occurs when individuals perceive their freedom to be threatened. From the standpoint of persuasive message design, reactance is an undesirable outcome that should be avoided whenever possible.

Methods:

Participants (N = 174) were randomly assigned to view 1 of 2 emergency preparedness messages (choice-enhancing language [“the choice is yours”] vs choice-restricting language [“you must”]) in a between-subjects-posttest-only online survey experiment.

Results:

Structural equation modeling revealed that choice-restricting language resulted in greater freedom threat and subsequent reactance. Reactance resulted in a diminished attitude and subsequent intention to prepare an emergency kit.

Conclusion:

Public health practitioners would benefit from the inclusion of choice-enhancing language in their public communications, alongside the exclusion of choice-restricting language. Pretesting of messages is recommended to avoid eliciting reactance and subsequent boomerang effects.

Keywords

choiceemergency preparednessfreedom threatmessage framingpsychological reactance
Type
Brief Report
Information
Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness , Volume 15 , Issue 3 , June 2021 , pp. 282 - 285
Copyright
Copyright © 2020 Society for Disaster Medicine and Public Health, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Coppola, DP, Maloney, EK. Communicating emergency preparedness: practical strategies for the public and private sectors. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brehm, JW. A theory of psychological reactance. New York, NY: Academic Press; 1966.Google Scholar
Dillard, JP, Shen, L. On the nature of reactance and its role in persuasive health communication. Commun Monogr. 2005;72:144-168. doi: 10.1080/03637750500111815.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quick, BL, Shen, L, Dillard, JP. Reactance theory and persuasion. In: Dillard, JP, Shen, L, eds. The SAGE Handbook of Persuasion: Advances in Theory and Research. Los Angeles, CA: Sage; 2013:167-183.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, BD, Siegel, JT. A 50-year review of psychological reactance theory: do not read this article. Motiv Sci. 2017;4:281-300. doi: 10.1037/mot0000091.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petty, RE, Cacioppo, JT. Communication and persuasion: central and peripheral routes to attitude change. New York, NY: Springer; 1986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fishbein, M, Ajzen, I. Predicting and changing behavior: the reasoned action approach. New York, NY: Psychology Press; 2010.Google Scholar
Kline, RB. Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. 4th ed. New York, NY: Guilford Press; 2016.Google Scholar
Holbert, RL, Stephenson, MT. Commentary on the uses and misuses of structural equation modeling in communication research. In: Hayes, AF, Slater, MD, Snyder, LB, eds. The SAGE Sourcebook of Advanced Data Analysis Methods for Communication Researchers. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2008:185-218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolin, B, Kurtz, LC. Race, class, ethnicity, and disaster vulnerability. In: Rodríguez, H, Donner, W, Trainor, JE, eds. Handbook of Disaster Research. New York, NY: Springer; 2018:181-203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Reynolds-Tylus and Martinez Gonzalez supplementary material

Appendix

Download Reynolds-Tylus and Martinez Gonzalez supplementary material(File)
File 29.6 KB