Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T20:46:34.206Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Using an Education Intervention to Increase Preparedness Among Pet Owners: Results of a Pilot Study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 August 2017

Lisa R. Baker ,
Loretta A. Cormier  and
Laura K. Vogtle
Lisa R. Baker*
Affiliation:
University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
Loretta A. Cormier
Affiliation:
University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
Laura K. Vogtle
Affiliation:
University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
*
Correspondence and reprint requests to Lisa R. Baker, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama (e-mail: [email protected]).
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objectives

Households with pets are considered a high-risk population, presenting many challenges to response and recovery efforts. Research indicates that households with pets are less likely to evacuate during disasters, and pets left behind pose a health risk to relief workers and the general public. This pilot study explores a brief education intervention targeting households with pets as a method of increasing general household preparedness, with the purpose of facilitating evacuation and protective behaviors in this population.

Methods

A convenience sample of households with pets was recruited to participate in a one-group pre- and post-survey design evaluating the impact of a brief education intervention on increasing pet-specific and general household preparedness levels.

Results

Results suggest that the sample population was below national estimates in basic household preparedness before the intervention. Post-survey results indicate an increase in completion of some preparedness tasks after the intervention. There was a statistically significant increase in overall pet preparedness at the P=0.10 level; however, that difference did not translate into general household preparedness.

Conclusion

The findings from this study are consistent with those from previous literature suggesting that persons often place the needs of their pets above their own; however, the use of a brief education intervention may be successful in increasing pet-specific preparedness levels, which may be useful in successful evacuation and pet well-being. (Disaster Med Public Health Preparedness. 2018;12:441–445)

Keywords

disasterhousehold preparednesspets
Type
Brief Report
Information
Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness , Volume 12 , Issue 4 , August 2018 , pp. 441 - 445
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Disaster Medicine and Public Health, Inc. 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Hunt, MG, Bogue, K, Rohrbaugh, N. Pet ownership and evacuation prior to Hurricane Irene. Animals. 2012;2:529-539.Google Scholar
2. Humane Society of the United States. Pets by the numbers. http://www.humanesociety.org/issues/pet_overpopulation/facts/pet_ownership_statistics_html. Published 2013. Accessed February 1, 2013.Google Scholar
3. Hunt, M, Al-Awadi, M, Johnson, M. Psychological sequelae of pet loss following Hurricane Katrina. Sociol Forum. 2010;25:110-122.Google Scholar
4. Thompson, K. Save me, save my dog: increasing natural disaster preparedness and survival by addressing human-animal relationships. Aust J Commun. 2013;40:123-135.Google Scholar
5. Thompson, K, Every, D, Rainbird, S, Cornell, V, Smith, B, Trigg, J. No pet or their person left behind: increasing the resilience of vulnerable groups through animal attachment, activities and networks. Animals. 2014;4:214-240.Google Scholar
6. American Kennel Club (AKC). AKC survey finds majority of owners would defy emergency evacuation orders and stay with pets. http://images.akc.org/pdf/press_center/press_releases/2006/Hurricane_Survey.pdf. Published 2006. Accessed February 1, 2014.Google Scholar
7. Heath, SE, Kass, PH, Beck, AM, Glickman, LT. Human and pet-related risk factors for household evacuation failure during a natural disaster. Am J Epidemiol. 2001;153:659-665.Google Scholar
8. Chaffee, M. Willingness of health care personnel to work in a disaster: an integrative review of the literature. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2009;3:42-56.Google Scholar
9. Warner, GS. Increased incidence of domestic animal bites following a natural disaster due to natural hazards. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2010;25:188-190.Google Scholar
10. American Red Cross (ARC). Pets. http://www.redcross.org/prepare/location/home-families/pets. Published 2013. Accessed September 19, 2013.Google Scholar
11. Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). Mass evacuation incident annex. https://www.fema.gov/pdf/emergency/nrf/nrf_massevacuationincidentannex.pdf. Published 2008. Accessed March 24, 2014.Google Scholar
12. Health, S, Linnabary, RD. Challenges of managing animals in disasters in the U.S. Animals. 2015;5:173-192.Google Scholar
13. Baker, MD, Baker, LR, Flagg, LA. Preparing families of children with special healthcare needs for disasters: an education intervention. Social Work Health Care. 2012;51:417-429.Google Scholar
14. Blessman, J, Skupski, J, Jamil, M, et al. Barriers to at-home-preparedness in public health employees: implications for disaster preparedness training. J Occup Med. 2007;49:318-326.Google Scholar
15. Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). Personal preparedness in America: findings from the 2012 FEMA National Survey. https://www.fema.gov/media-librarydata/662ad7b4a323dcf07b829ce0c5b77ad9/2012_FEMA_National_Survey_Report.pdf. Published 2013. Accessed June 6, 2013.Google Scholar
16. United States Census Bureau. American Housing Survey. https://www.census.gov/content/dam/Census/library/visualizations/2015/comm/how_ready_are_we.pdf. Published 2015. Accessed May 19, 2017.Google Scholar