Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T08:57:45.178Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

To Do No Harm: Humanitarian Aid in Conflict Demands Political Engagement

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 January 2018

Ronak B. Patel  and
Hannah B. Wild
Ronak B. Patel*
Affiliation:
Harvard Humanitarian Initiative, Cambridge, Massachusetts, Department of Emergency Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts Freeman Spogli Institute for International Studies, Stanford, California
Hannah B. Wild
Affiliation:
Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
*
Correspondence and reprint requests to Ronak B. Patel, Harvard Humanitarian Initiative, 14 Story St., Second Floor, Cambridge, MA 02138 (e-mail: [email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Humanitarian aid in settings of conflict has always been fraught with challenges. In the absence of political engagement, however, manipulation by state authorities, however, have the potential to pervert aid intervention to inflict harm. South Sudan exemplifies how states may abuse the humanitarian response to retreat from public responsibility, divert funds to further violence and conflict and dictate the distribution of aid. Recent trends toward nationalist policies in the West that favor disengagement and limited military strikes have the very effect of allowing this abuse to transform humanitarian aid into a tool for harm. (Disaster Med Public Health Preparedness. 2018;12:567–568)

Keywords

vulnerable populationsviolencestate governmentrelief workpolicy-making
Type
Policy Analysis
Information
Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness , Volume 12 , Issue 5 , October 2018 , pp. 567 - 568
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Disaster Medicine and Public Health, Inc. 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Lischer, SK. Collateral damage: humanitarian assistance as a cause of conflict. International Security. 2003;28(1):79-109.Google Scholar
2. Aid Worker Security Database. Major attacks on aid workers: summary statistics (2005-2015). Humanitarian Outcomes, 2017. https://aidworkersecurity.org/incidents/report/summary. Accessed April 8, 2017.Google Scholar
3. Nunberg, B. South Sudan’s civil service challenges: an outside perspective. International Growth Center Working Paper, 2015. http://www.theigc.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/Nunberg-2015-Working-paper.pdf. Accessed April 12, 2017.Google Scholar
4. Nichols, M. South Sudan to blame for famine, still buying arms: U.N. report. Reuters. March 17, 2017. http://www.reuters.com/article/us-southsudan-security-un-idUSKBN16O0DB. Accessed April 11, 2017.Google Scholar
5. Shimanyula, J, Meier, M. South Sudan: aid supplies blocked while fighting spreads. Deutsche Welle. March 7, 2016. http://www.dw.com/en/south-sudan-aid-supplies-blocked-while-fighting-spreads/a-19100133.Google Scholar