Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T21:06:06.416Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

San Diego's Area Coordinator System: A Disaster Preparedness Model for US Nursing Homes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 April 2013

Abstract

Almost 2 million Americans rely on nursing homes for care, and many require daily or near daily contact with the health care system to remain alive and functional. In October 2007, Southern California experienced a series of wildfires that burned over 500 000 acres and caused 14 nursing homes to evacuate more than 1200 residents. In response to this event, nursing home administrators and officials from various health care and emergency management agencies in San Diego County collaborated to form a model for nursing home emergency preparedness. This report describes the model, known as the area coordinator system, and discusses its strengths and limitations, and whether it ought to be replicated in other areas of the country.

(Disaster Med Public Health Preparedness. 2012;6:424-427)

Type
Special Focus
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Disaster Medicine and Public Health, Inc. 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.National Center for Health Statistics, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Vital and Health Statistics. Series 13, No. 152. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; June 2002.Google Scholar
2.Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Nursing Home Compare. Washington, DC: Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. http://www.medicare.gov/NHCompare/.Google Scholar
3.Office of Inspector General. Nursing Home Emergency Preparedness and Response During Recent Hurricanes. Washington, DC: US Dept of Health and Human Services; August 2006. OEI-06-06-00020.Google Scholar
4.Reza, HGLeovy, JPham, A. Scale of the fire's disruption on display at San Diego Stadium. Los Angeles Times. October 24, 2007.Google Scholar
5.National Cooperative Highway Research Program. Transportation's Role in Emergency Evacuation and Reentry: A Synthesis for Highway Practice. NCHRP Synthesis 392. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board; 2009.Google Scholar
6.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Swine influenza A (H1N1) infection in two children—Southern California, March-April 2009. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2009;58(15):400402.Google Scholar
7.San Diego County Area Skilled Nursing and/or Long Term Care Facilities Emergency Mutual Aid Memorandum of Agreement, San Diego Skilled Nursing Disaster Preparedness Task Force. http://www.cahfdownload.com/cahf/dpp/MOA_10-20-08_ATTY_finalized.pdf. Accessed October 18, 2012.Google Scholar
8.Tarde, SJ. County/Provider Partnerships: Disaster Preparedness and Long-term Care Bed Reporting. Presented at: the California Association of Health Facilities Disaster Preparedness Conference; Long Beach, CA; September 29, 2009.Google Scholar
9.Madoori, S.2007 San Diego County wildfire response: a lesson in disaster preparedness collaboration. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2008;2(1):1516.Google Scholar
10.Jenkins, JLHsu, EBSauer, LMHsieh, YHKirsch, TD. Prevalence of unmet health care needs and description of health care-seeking behavior among displaced people after the 2007 California wildfires. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2009;3(2)(suppl):S24S28.Google Scholar
11.Kaji, AHKoenig, KLLewis, RJ. Current hospital disaster preparedness. JAMA. 2007;298(18):21882190.Google Scholar
12.California Hospital Association. Model Hospital Mutual Aid MOU. Sacramento, CA: California Hospital Association. http://www.calhospitalprepare.org/document/model-hospital-mutual-aid-mou.Google Scholar
13.Dosa, DMGrossman, NWetle, TMor, V.To evacuate or not to evacuate: lessons learned from Louisiana nursing home administrators following Hurricanes Katrina and Rita. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2007;8(3):142149.Google Scholar