Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T04:31:47.109Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Public Health Laboratories and Radiological Readiness

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 April 2013

Megan Weil Latshaw ,
Chris Mangal ,
Anthony Barkey ,
Doug McNamara ,
Deborah Kim  and
Jennifer Beck Pierson
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective: To document the ability of public health laboratories to respond to radiological emergencies.

Methods: The Association of Public Health Laboratories developed, distributed, and analyzed two separate surveys of public health laboratories representing the 50 US states and major nonstate jurisdictions. The 2009 All-Hazards Laboratory Preparedness Survey examined overall laboratory capability and capacity, with a subset of questions on radiation preparedness. A 2011 survey focused exclusively on radiation readiness.

Results: The 50 state and District of Columbia public health laboratories responded to the 2009 All-Hazards Laboratory Preparedness Survey, representing a 98% response rate. In addition to the above laboratories, environmental and agricultural laboratories responded to the 2011 Radiation Capabilities Survey, representing a 76% response rate. Twenty-seven percent of the All-Hazards Survey respondents reported the ability to measure radionuclides in clinical specimens; 6% reported that another state agency or department accepted and analyzed these samples via a radioanalytical method. Of the Radiation Capabilities Survey respondents, 60% reported the ability to test environmental samples, such as air, soil, or surface water, for radiation; 48% reported the ability to test nonmilk food samples; 47% reported the ability to test milk; and 56% reported sending data for drinking water to the Environmental Protection Agency.

Conclusions: Survey data reveal serious gaps in US radiological preparedness. In 2007, federal experts estimated it would take more than 4 years to screen 100 000 individuals for radiation exposure and 6 years to test environmental samples from a large-scale radiological emergency, relying on existing laboratory assets. Although some progress has been made since 2007, public health laboratory radiological test capabilities and capacities remain insufficient to respond to a major event. Adequate preparation requires significant new investment to build and enhance laboratory emergency response networks, as well as investments in the broader public health system in which public health laboratories function.

(Disaster Med Public Health Preparedness. 2011;5:213-217)

Keywords

radiochemistrylaboratoryemergency preparednessradiationpublic healthradiation effectsemergenciesenvironmental exposureAll-Hazards approach
Type
Original Research
Information
Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness , Volume 5 , Issue 3 , October 2011 , pp. 213 - 217
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Disaster Medicine and Public Health, Inc. 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.International Atomic Energy Agency. International Nuclear and Radiological Event Scale factsheet. http://www.iaea.org/Publications/Factsheets/English/ines.pdf. Accessed May 26, 2011.Google Scholar
2.Association of Public Health Laboratories. Radiological threats.2011 Japan nuclear crisis. Public documents and information. http://www.aphl.org/aphlprograms/eh/radiological/Pages/japancrisis.aspx. Accessed May 12, 2011.Google Scholar
3.Environmental Protection Agency. Japanese nuclear emergency: radiation monitoring.EPA's RadNet data. http://www.epa.gov/japan2011/rert/radnet-data-map.html. Accessed April 23, 2011.Google Scholar
4.US Customs and Border Protection.CBP statement concerning radiation monitoring of travelers, goods from Japan. http://www.cbp.gov/xp/cgov/newsroom/news_releases/national/03172011_6.xml. Accessed April 23, 2011.Google Scholar
5.Watkins, SM, Perrotta, DM, Stanbury, M.State-level emergency preparedness and response capabilities. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2011;5(Suppl 1)S134–S142.Google Scholar
6. McFee, RB, Leikin, JB.Death by polonium-210: lessons learned from the murder of former Soviet spy Alexander Litvinenko. Semin Diagn Pathol. 2009;26 (1):61–67.Google Scholar
7.Trevelyan, MDirty bomb lessons drawn from Litvinenko murder. http://uk.reuters.com/article/2007/11/13/uk-litvinenko-radiation-idUKL1258696320071113. Published November 13, 2007. Accessed May 12, 2011.Google Scholar
8.Radiological Response: Assessing Environmental and Clinical Laboroatory Capabilities: Hearing before the Subcommittee on Investigations and Oversight, of the House Committee on Science and Technology, 110th Cong (2007). http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CHRG-110hhrg38340/html/CHRG-110hhrg38340.htm. Accessed September 19, 2011.Google Scholar
9.Tan, CM, Barnett, DJ, Stolz, AJ, Links, JM.Radiological incident preparedness: planning at the local level. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2011;5(Suppl 1)S151–S158.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Office of Public Health Preparedness and Response. Funding, guidance, and technical assistance to states, localities, and territories. http://www.bt.cdc.gov/cdcpreparedness/coopagreement/index.asp. Accessed April 23, 2011.Google Scholar
11.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Emergency Preparedness and Response.The Laboratory Response Network, partners in preparedness. http://www.bt.cdc.gov/lrn. Accessed April 23, 2011.Google Scholar
12.Environmental Protection Agency. Environmental Response Laboratory Network (ERLN).Basic information about the ERLN. http://www.epa.gov/erln/info.html. Accessed April 23, 2011.Google Scholar
13.Environmental Protection Agency. Water Laboratory Alliance. http://www.epa.gov/safewater/watersecurity/pubs/fs_watersecurity_waterlaballiance.pdf. Accessed April 23, 2011.Google Scholar
14.Environmental Protection Agency. Food Emergency Response Network. http://fernlab.org. Accessed April 23, 2011.Google Scholar
15.Association of Public Health Laboratories. Public health laboratory preparedness: ready, set, respond.An APHL report on the preparedness of state public health laboratories. http://www.aphl.org/AboutAPHL/publications/Documents/PHPR_2008May_APHLReportPreparednessStatePHLs.pdf. Accessed April 23, 2011.Google Scholar
16.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Radiation Studies Branch.Division of Environmental Hazards and Health Effects. National Center for Environmental Health. Population monitoring in radiation emergencies: a guide for state and local public health planners. http://www.emergency.cdc.gov/radiation/pdf/population-monitoring-guide.pdf. Published August 2007. Accessed August 25, 2011.Google Scholar
17.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). CDC Grand Rounds: radiological and nuclear preparedness. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2010;59 (36):1178–1181.Google Scholar