Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T01:16:33.760Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Psychological Correlates of Civilian Preparedness for Conflicts

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 February 2017

Moran Bodas*
Affiliation:
The Department of Disaster Medicine, School of Public Health, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Israel
Maya Siman-Tov
Affiliation:
Israel National Center for Trauma & Emergency Medicine Research, The Gertner Institute for Epidemiology and Health Policy Research, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Ramat-Gan, Israel
Shulamith Kreitler
Affiliation:
School of Psychological Sciences, Gordon Faculty of Social Sciences, Tel-Aviv University, Israel and Psychooncology Research Center, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Ramat-Gan, Israel
Kobi Peleg
Affiliation:
The Department of Disaster Medicine, School of Public Health, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Israel Israel National Center for Trauma & Emergency Medicine Research, The Gertner Institute for Epidemiology and Health Policy Research, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Ramat-Gan, Israel
*
Correspondence and reprint requests to Moran Bodas, MPH, The Department of Disaster Medicine, School of Public Health, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, P.O. Box 39040, Ramat Aviv, Tel-Aviv, 69978 ISRAEL (e-mail: [email protected]).

Abstract

Objectives

Preparedness for emergencies and disasters is imperative for public resilience. Previous studies have revealed low levels of civilian preparedness for conflicts. Classic behavioral models prove inapt in describing preparedness patterns in victimized populations chronically exposed to this threat. In an effort to expand this perspective, we hypothesized that other psychological constructs are correlated with preparedness.

Methods

A cross-sectional, Internet-based study was performed in Israel in early 2016. A sociodemographically diverse sample included 385 participants, Jews and Arabs. The tools included a preparedness index, sense of preparedness questionnaire, Trait Anxiety Inventory, Life Orientation Test, Behavioral Inhibition & Activation System scales, and ego defenses.

Results

The results suggested that optimistic and rational individuals reported significantly higher levels of preparedness, whereas those who scored highly on the trait anxiety scale and those with a tendency to use denial coping mechanisms reported significantly lower levels of preparedness.

Conclusions

The findings suggest that additional constructs, other than classic threat perception components, might play a key role in governing preparedness behavior. In particular, psychological manipulation of dispositional optimism or optimistic thinking might be effective in motivating preparedness behavior. Future research should explore such innovative ways to promoting preparedness. (Disaster Med Public Health Preparedness. 2017;11:451–459)

Type
Original Research
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Disaster Medicine and Public Health, Inc. 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Hemond, Y, Robert, B. Preparedness: the state of the art and future prospects. Disaster Prev Manag. 2012;21(4):404-417. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/09653561211256125.Google Scholar
2. Peek, LA, Mileti, DS. The history of disaster research. In: Bechtel RB, Churchman A, eds. Handbook of Environmental Psychology. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons Inc; 2002:511-524.Google Scholar
3. Coffman, S. Parents’ struggle to rebuild family life after Hurricane Andrew. Issues Ment Health Nurs. 1996;17(4):353-367. http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/01612849609009406.Google Scholar
4. Gerrity, ET, Steinglass, P. Relocation stress following catastrophic events. In: Ursano RJ, ed. Terrorism and Disaster: Individual and Community Mental Health Interventions. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press; 2003:259-286.Google Scholar
5. Miller, L. Family therapy of terroristic trauma: psychological syndromes and treatment strategies. Am J Fam Ther. 2003;31(4):257-280. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01926180390201963.Google Scholar
6. Patterson, JM. Integrating family resilience and family stress theory. J Marriage Fam. 2002;64(2):349-360. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2002.00349.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Buchbut, A. The Nightmare Scenario of the IDF for War with Hezbollah: About A Thousand Rockets per Day [in Hebrew]. Walla News website. http://news.walla.co.il/item/2842607. Published March 31, 2015. Accessed June 1, 2016.Google Scholar
8. Bodas, M, Siman-Tov, M, Kreitler, S, et al. Assessment of emergency preparedness of households in Israel to war: current status. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2015;9(4):382-390. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/dmp.2015.56.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9. Paton, D. Disaster preparedness: a social-cognitive perspective. Disaster Prev Manag. 2003;12(3):210-216. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/09653560310480686.Google Scholar
10. Paton, D, Smith, L, Johnston, D. When good intentions turn bad: promoting natural hazard preparedness. Aust J Emerg Manag. 2005;20(1):25-30.Google Scholar
11. Bodas, M, Siman-Tov, M, Kreitler, S, et al. Perception of the threat of war in Israel: implications for future preparedness planning [published online October 1, 2015]. Israel J Health Policy Res. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13584-015-0026-7.Google Scholar
12. Rüstemli, A, Karanci, AN. Correlates of earthquake cognitions and preparedness behavior in a victimized population. J Soc Psychol. 1999;139(1):91-101. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00224549909598364.Google Scholar
13. Karanci, AN, Aksit, B, Dirik, G. Impact of a community disaster awareness training program in Turkey: does it influence hazard-related cognitions and preparedness behaviors. Social Behavior and Personality: an International Journal. 2005;33(3):243-258.Google Scholar
14. Kreitler, S. The cognitive guidance of behavior. In: Jost JT, Banaji MR, Prentice DA, eds. Perspectivism in Social Psychology: The Yin and Yang of Scientific Progress. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 2004:113-126. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/10750-009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15. Kreitler, S, Kreitler, H. Cognitive orientation and physical disease or health. Eur J Pers. 1991;5(2):109-129. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/per.2410050205.Google Scholar
16. Spielberger, CD, Gorsuch, RL, Lushene, RE. STAI.Manual for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (Self Evaluation Questionnaire). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologist; 1970.Google Scholar
17. Scheier, MF, Carver, CS. Optimism, coping, and health: assessment and implications of generalized outcome expectancies. Health Psychol. 1985;4(3):219-247. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0278-6133.4.3.219.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18. Carver, CS, White, TL. Behavioral inhibition, behavioral activation, and affective responses to impending reward and punishment: the BIS/BAS Scales. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1994;67(2):319-333. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.67.2.319.Google Scholar
19. Conte, HR, Plutchik, R. Ego Defenses: Theory and Measurement (No. 10). New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons; 1995.Google Scholar
20. Popper, M, Amit, K, Gal, R, et al. The capacity to lead: major psychological differences between “leaders” and “non leaders.” Mil Psychol. 2004;16(4):245-263. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327876mp1604_3.Google Scholar
21. Higgins, ET. Beyond pleasure and pain. Am Psychol. 1997;52(12):1280-1300. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.52.12.1280.Google Scholar
22. Umansky, A. Depression and Avoidance - Increase in Sensitivity to Negative Reinforcement and Decrease in Sensitivity to Positive Reinforcement as A Common Basis for Understanding Depression in Behavioral and Cognitive Models [master’s thesis]. Jerusalem, Israel: Hebrew University of Jerusalem; 2011. http://arad.mscc.huji.ac.il/dissertations/W/JMS/001742932.pdf. Accessed August 23, 2016.Google Scholar
23. Apter, A, Gothelf, D, Offer, R, et al. Suicidal adolescents and ego defense mechanisms. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 1997;36(11):1520-1527.Google Scholar
24. Soffer, Y, Goldberg, A, Adini, B, et al. The relationship between demographic/educational parameters and perceptions, knowledge and earthquake mitigation in Israel. Disasters. 2011;35(1):36-44. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7717.2010.01191.x.Google Scholar
25. Fothergill, A. Gender, risk, and disaster. Int J Mass Emerg Disasters. 1996;14(1):33-56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26. Kirschenbaum, A. Families and disaster behavior: a reassessment of family preparedness. Int J Mass Emerg Disasters. 2006;24:111-143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
27. Page, L, Rubin, J, Amlot, R, et al. Are Londoners prepared for an emergency? A longitudinal study following the London bombings. Biosecur Bioterror . 2008;6(4):309-319. http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/bsp.2008.0043.Google Scholar
28. Greenberg, MR, Schneider, DF. Gender differences in risk perception: effects differ in stressed vs. non‐stressed environments. Risk Anal. 1995;15(4):503-511. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.1995.tb00343.x.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
29. Herzog, H. Homefront and battlefront: the status of Jewish and Palestinian women in Israel. Isr Stud. 1998;3(1):61-84. http://dx.doi.org/10.2979/ISR.1998.3.1.61.Google Scholar
30. The Social Survey 2010. Health, Life-Style and Use of Computers and Internet [in Hebrew]. Israel Central Bureau of Statistics website. http://www.cbs.gov.il/reader/?MIval=cw_usr_view_SHTML&ID=929. Accessed March 15, 2016.Google Scholar