Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T05:18:03.508Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Informing the Gestalt: An Ethical Framework for Allocating Scarce Federal Public Health and Medical Resources to States During Disasters

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 March 2014

Ann R. Knebel ,
Virginia A. Sharpe ,
Marion Danis ,
Lauren M. Toomey  and
Deborah K. Knickerbocker
Ann R. Knebel*
Affiliation:
National Institute for Nursing Research, Bethesda, Maryland
Virginia A. Sharpe
Affiliation:
National Center for Ethics in Health Care, Veterans Health Administration, Washington, DC
Marion Danis
Affiliation:
Clinical Center Department of Bioethics, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
Lauren M. Toomey
Affiliation:
Office of the Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response, Office of Emergency Management, US Department of Health and Human Services, Washington, DC.
Deborah K. Knickerbocker
Affiliation:
Office of the Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response, Office of Emergency Management, US Department of Health and Human Services, Washington, DC.
*
Correspondence and reprint requests to Ann R. Knebel, PhD, RN, National Institutes of Health, National Institute for Nursing Research, 31 Center Dr, Bldg 31, Rm 5B05, Bethesda, MD 20892-2178 (e-mail [email protected]).
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

During catastrophic disasters, government leaders must decide how to efficiently and effectively allocate scarce public health and medical resources. The literature about triage decision making at the individual patient level is substantial, and the National Response Framework provides guidance about the distribution of responsibilities between federal and state governments. However, little has been written about the decision-making process of federal leaders in disaster situations when resources are not sufficient to meet the needs of several states simultaneously. We offer an ethical framework and logic model for decision making in such circumstances. We adapted medical triage and the federalism principle to the decision-making process for allocating scarce federal public health and medical resources. We believe that the logic model provides a values-based framework that can inform the gestalt during the iterative decision process used by federal leaders as they allocate scarce resources to states during catastrophic disasters. (Disaster Med Public Health Preparedness. 2014;0:1–10)

Keywords

ethical issuespoliticsstate/local issues
Type
Concepts in Disaster Medicine
Information
Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness , Volume 8 , Issue 1 , February 2014 , pp. 79 - 88
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Disaster Medicine and Public Health, Inc. 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. National Emergency Management Association. Emergency management assistance compact website. http://www.emacweb.org/. Accessed May 30, 2013.Google Scholar
2. Federal Emergency Management Agency, US Department of Homeland Security. The National Response Framework, 2nd ed. Washington, DC: Department of Homeland Security; May 2013. http://www.fema.gov/national-response-framework. Accessed July 31, 2013.Google Scholar
3. Barnett, DJ, Taylor, HA, Hodge, JG Jr, Links, JM. Resource allocation on the frontlines of public health preparedness and response: report of a summit on legal and ethical issues. Public Health Rep. 2009;124(2):295-303.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4. Gostin, LO, Powers, M. What does social justice require for the public's health? Public health ethics and policy imperatives. Health Aff (Millwood). 2006;25(4):1053-1060.Google Scholar
5. Institute of Medicine. Crisis Standards of Care: A Systems Framework for Catastrophic Disaster Response. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2012.Google Scholar
6. Kinlaw, K, Barrett, DH, Levine, RJ. Ethical guidelines in pandemic influenza: recommendations of the ethics subcommittee of the advisory committee of the director, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2009;3(suppl 2):S185-S192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Kotalik, J. Preparing for an influenza pandemic: ethical issues. Bioethics. 2005;19(4):422-431.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8. National Center for Ethics in Health Care, Veterans Health Administration, Department of Veterans Affairs. Meeting the challenge of pandemic influenza: ethical guidance for leaders and health care professionals in the Veterans Health Administration. July 2010: http://www.ethics.va.gov/activities/pandemic_influenza_preparedness.asp. Accessed July 31, 2013.Google Scholar
9. Persad, G, Wertheimer, A, Emanuel, EJ. Principles for allocation of scarce medical interventions. Lancet. 2009;373(9661):423-431.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10. Thompson, AK, Faith, K, Gibson, JL, Upshur, RE. Pandemic influenza preparedness: an ethical framework to guide decision-making. BMC Med Ethics. 2006;7:E12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11. Vawter, DE, Garrett, JE, Gervais, KG, etal. For the Good of Us All: Ethically Rationing Health Resources in Minnesota in a Severe Influenza Pandemic. Minneapolis, MN: Minnesota Department of Health; 2010. http://www.health.state.mn.us/divs/idepc/ethics/ethics.pdf. Accessed January 23, 2014.Google Scholar
12. Verweij, M; Working Group One. Equitable access to therapeutic and prophylactic measures. In: Addressing Ethical Issues in Pandemic Influenza Planning. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; October 26, 2006, http://www.who.int/csr/resources/publications/cds_flu_ethics_5web.pdf. Accessed July 31, 2013.Google Scholar
13. University of Toronto Joint Centre for Bioethics, Pandemic Influenza Working Group. Stand on guard for thee: ethical considerations in prepardeness planning for pandemic influenza. Toronto, Ontario: University of Toronto Joint Centre for Bioethics, Pandemic Influenza Working Group; November 2005. http://www.jointcentreforbioethics.ca/people/documents/upshur_stand_guard.pdf. Accessed July 31, 2013.Google Scholar
14. McLean, M. Ethical preparedness for pandemic influenza: a toolkit website. October 2012. http://www.scu.edu/ethics/practicing/focusareas/medical/pandemic.html. Accessed July 31, 2013.Google Scholar
15. Roberts, M, DeRenzo, E. Ethical considerations in community disaster planning. In: Phillips S, Knebel A, eds. Mass Medical Care With Scarce Resources: A Community Planning Guide. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2007:9-23.Google Scholar
16. Caro, JJ, Coleman, CN, Knebel, A, DeRenzo, EG. Unaltered ethical standards for individual physicians in the face of drastically reduced resources resulting from an improvised nuclear device event. J Clin Ethics. 2011;22(1):33-41.Google Scholar
17. Kilner, J. Who Lives? Who Dies? Ethical Criteria in Patient Selection. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press; 1990.Google Scholar
18. Kuschner, WG, Pollard, JB, Ezeji-Okoye, SC. Ethical triage and scarce resource allocation during public health emergencies: tenets and procedures. Hosp Top. 2007;85(3):16-25.Google Scholar
19. Winslow, G. Triage and Justice: The Ethics of Rationing Life-Saving Medical Resources. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press; 1982.Google Scholar
20. Institute of Medicine. Guidance for Establishing Crisis Standards of Care for Use in Disaster Situations: A Letter Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2009.Google Scholar
21. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, US Department of Health and Human Services. Crisis and emergency risk communication (CERC) website. http://www.bt.cdc.gov/cerc/. Accessed August 2, 2013.Google Scholar
22. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Communicating in a Crisis: Risk Communication Guidelines for Public Officials. Rockville, MD: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration; 2002. http://store.samhsa.gov/product/Risk-Communication-Guidelines-for-Public-Officials/SMA02-3641. Accessed August 2, 2013.Google Scholar
23. Buchanan, J. Federalism and fiscal equity. Am Econ Rev. 1950;40(4):583-599.Google Scholar
24. Commission on Intergovernmental Relations. Natural disaster relief. In: A Report to the President for Transmittal to the Congress. Washington, DC: Commission on Intergovernmental Relations; June 1955:328.Google Scholar
25. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, US Department of Health and Human Services. Funding and guidance for state and local health departments website. http://www.cdc.gov/phpr/coopagreement.htm. Accessed August 2, 2013.Google Scholar
26. Office of the Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response, US Department of Health and Human Services. Hospital preparedness program: funding and grant opportunities website. http://www.phe.gov/Preparedness/planning/hpp/Pages/funding.aspx. Accessed August 2, 2013.Google Scholar
27. Danis, M, Hansen, C, Knebel, A. Developing guidance to support allocation by HHS of scarce federal resources in disaster settings: an opportunity for stakeholder input. Paper presented at: Integrated Medical, Public Health, Preparedness and Response Training Summit; May 21-25, 2012; Nashville, TN.Google Scholar
28. Danis, M, Sharpe, V, Knebel, A. Allocating scarce federal public health and medical resources in disaster situations: a framework for ethical decision making. Paper presented at: National Institutes of Health Bioethics Interest Group; January 7, 2013; Bethesda, MD.Google Scholar
29. Sharpe, V, Danis, M, Knebel, A. Draft guidance on allocating scarce federal resources in disaster situations: a framework for ethical decision making. Paper presented at: American Society for Bioethics and Humanities Annual Meeting; October 18-21, 2012; Washington, DC.Google Scholar
30. Baker, R, Strosberg, M. Triage and equality: An historical reassessment of utilitarian analyses of triage. Kennedy Ins. Ethics J.. 1992;2(2):103-123.Google Scholar
31. Health Resources and Services Administration, US Department of Health and Human Services. Find shortage areas: medically underserved areas/populations by state and county website. http://muafind.hrsa.gov/. Accessed August 2, 2013.Google Scholar
32. Federal Emergency Management Agency, US Department of Homeland Security. Guidance on planning for integration of functional needs support services in general population shelters; November 2010. http://www.fema.gov/pdf/about/odic/fnss_guidance.pdf. Accessed August 2, 2013.Google Scholar
33. Office of the Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response, US Department of Health and Human Services. National level exercise: improvement plan. Washington, DC: US Department of Health and Human Services; September 30, 2011. item 4.2.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Knebel Supplementary Material

Appendix

Download Knebel Supplementary Material(File)
File 27.6 KB