Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T10:07:41.606Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Impacts of the Emergency Mass Evacuation of the Elderly From Residential Care Facilities After the 2011 Christchurch Earthquake

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 May 2013

Claire P. Heppenstall ,
Tim J. Wilkinson ,
H. Carl Hanger ,
Michelle R. Dhanak  and
Sally Keeling
Claire P. Heppenstall*
Affiliation:
Canterbury District Health Board, Department of Older Persons Health, The Princess Margaret Hospital, Christchurch, New Zealand
Tim J. Wilkinson
Affiliation:
Canterbury District Health Board, Department of Older Persons Health, The Princess Margaret Hospital, Christchurch, New Zealand Christchurch School of Medicine and Health Science, University of Otago, Department of Medicine, The Princess Margaret Hospital, Christchurch, New Zealand
H. Carl Hanger
Affiliation:
Canterbury District Health Board, Department of Older Persons Health, The Princess Margaret Hospital, Christchurch, New Zealand
Michelle R. Dhanak
Affiliation:
Canterbury District Health Board, Department of Older Persons Health, The Princess Margaret Hospital, Christchurch, New Zealand
Sally Keeling
Affiliation:
Christchurch School of Medicine and Health Science, University of Otago, Department of Medicine, The Princess Margaret Hospital, Christchurch, New Zealand
*
Address correspondence and reprint requests to Claire Heppenstall, PhD, The Princess Margaret Hospital, 1st floor F-block, PO Box 800, Christchurch, New Zealand (e-mail: [email protected]).
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective

The 2011 earthquake that devastated Christchurch, New Zealand, led to the closure and evacuation of 7 residential care facilities and the partial evacuation of 2 more. Altogether, 516 elderly persons were evacuated. The emergent nature of the disaster was unexpected and largely unplanned for. This study explored the evacuees’ experiences and identified lessons learned for future disaster planning.

Methods

This qualitative study used a general inductive method. Semistructured interviews with evacuees were held in 4 centers throughout New Zealand. Their informal caregivers were also identified and interviewed. Answers were coded and grouped for key themes to provide lessons learned for future disaster planning.

Results

We conducted 50 interviews with older people and 34 with informal caregivers. Key themes that emerged were resilience and factors that promoted resilience, including personal attitudes, life experiences, enhanced family support, and social supports. Areas of concern were (1) the mental health of evacuees: 36% reported some symptoms of anxiety, while 32.4% of caregivers reported some cognitive decline; and (2) communication difficulties during the evacuations.

Conclusions

Older people were remarkably resilient to the difficult events, and resilience was promoted by family and community support. Anxiety was reported by older people, while informal caregivers reported cognitive issues. Communication difficulties were a major concern.

Keywords

earthquakedisaster responseaged residential careevacuationfrail elderly
Type
Original Research
Information
Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness , Volume 7 , Issue 4 , August 2013 , pp. 419 - 423
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Disaster Medicine and Public Health, Inc. 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.McColl, GJ, Burkle, FM. The new normal: twelve months of resiliency and recovery in Christchurch. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2012;6(1):33-43.Google Scholar
2.Lyneham, J, Byrne, H. Nurses’ experience of what helped and hindered during the Christchurch earthquake. Kai Tiaki Nurs Res. 2011;2(1):17-20.Google Scholar
3.Dobalian, A, Stein, JA, Heslin, KC, etal. Impact of the Northridge earthquake on the mental health of veterans: results from a panel study. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2011;5(suppl 2):S220-S225.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4.Pekovic, V, Seff, L, Rothman, MB. Planning for and responding to special needs of elders in natural disasters. Generations. 2007;31:37-41.Google Scholar
5.Dosa, DM, Hyer, K, Brown, LM, Artenstein, AW, Polivka-West, L, Mor, V. The controversy inherent in managing frail nursing home residents during complex hurricane emergencies. J Am Med Direct Assoc. 2008;9(8):599-604.Google Scholar
6.Rothman, M, Brown, LM. The vulnerable geriatric casualty: medical needs of frail older adults during disasters. Generations. 2007;31:16-20.Google Scholar
7.Bartels, SA, VanRooyen, MJ. Medical complications associated with earthquakes. Lancet. 2012;379(9817):748-758.Google Scholar
8.Norris, FH, Friedman, MJ, Watson, PJ, Byrne, CM, Diaz, E, Kaniasty, K. 60,000 disaster victims speak: part 1. an empirical review of the empirical literature 1981-2001. Psychiatry. 2002;65(3):207-239.Google Scholar
9.Levin, A. Resilience is norm for most exposed to trauma. Psychiatric News. 2011;46(19):6.Google Scholar
10.Castle, NG, Engberg, JB. The health consequences of relocation for nursing home residents following Hurricane Katrina. Res Aging. 2011;33(6):661-687.Google Scholar
11.Bolin, R, Klenow, DJ. Response of the elderly to disaster: an age-stratified analysis. Int J Aging Hum Dev. 1982;16(4):283-297.Google Scholar
12.Burkle, FM. The limits to our capacity: reflections on resiliency, community engagement and recovery in 21st-century crises. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2011;5(suppl 2):S176-S181.Google Scholar
13.Stroud, C, Altevogt, BM, Goldfrank, LR. Institute of Medicine's Forum on Medical and Public Health Preparedness for Catastrophic Events: current initiatives. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2010;4:174-177.Google Scholar
14.Brown, LM. Issues in mental health care for older adults after disasters. Generations. 2007;31:21-26.Google Scholar