Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T18:33:06.707Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Hospital Response to a Major Freeway Bridge Collapse

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 April 2013

Abstract

Background: We describe the hospital system response to the Interstate 35W bridge collapse in Minneapolis into the Mississippi River on August 1, 2007, which resulted in 13 deaths and 127 injuries. Comparative analysis of response activities at the 3 hospitals that received critical or serious casualties is provided.

Methods: First-hand experiences of hospital physicians, issues identified in after-action reports, injury severity scores, and other relevant patient data were collected from the 3 hospitals that received seriously injured patients, including the closest hospitals to the collapse on each side of the river.

Results/Discussion: Injuries were consistent with major acceleration/deceleration force injuries. The most critical patients arrived first at each hospital, suggesting appropriate prehospital triage. Capacity of the health care system was not overwhelmed and the involved hospitals generally reported an overresponse by staff. Communication and patient tracking problems occurred at all of the hospitals. Situational awareness was limited due to the scope of structural collapse and incomplete information from the scene.

Conclusions: Hospitals were generally satisfied with their surge capacity and incident management plan activation. Issues such as communications, patient tracking, and staff overreporting that have been identified in past incidents also were problematic in this event. Hospitals will need to address deficiencies and build on successful actions to cope with future, potentially larger incidents. (Disaster Med Public Health Preparedness. 2008;2(Suppl 1):S11–S16)

Type
Original Research and Critical Analysis
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Disaster Medicine and Public Health, Inc. 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Barbera J, McIntyre A. Medical Surge Capacity and Capability: A Management System for Integrating Medical and Health Resources During Large-Scale Emergencies. CNA Corporation Web site. August 2004. http://www.cna.org/documents/mscc_aug2004.pdf. Accessed May 22, 2006.Google Scholar
2.Hick, JL, Hanfling, D, Burstein, JL, et alHealthcare facility and community strategies for patient care surge capacity. Ann Emerg Med. 2004;44:253261.Google Scholar
3. Hospital Incident Command System. California Emergency Medical Services Authority Web site. http://www.emsa.ca.gov/HICS/default.asp. Accessed January 21, 2008.Google Scholar
4. IS 701—Multi-Agency Coordination Systems. National Incident Management System (NIMS). Federal Emergency Management Agency Emergency Management Institute Web site. 2007. http://emilms.fema.gov/IS701/index.htm. Accessed January 21, 2008.Google Scholar
5. Multi-Agency Coordination Systems in Health Events. Minnesota Department of Health Web site. 2006. http://www.health.state.mn.us/oep/plans/multiagency.ppt. Accessed January 21, 2008.Google Scholar
6.Auf der Heide, E.The importance of evidence-based disaster planning, Ann Emerg Med. 2006;47:3449.Google Scholar
7.Milsten, A.Hospital responses to acute-onset disasters: a review. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2000;15:3245.Google Scholar
8.Burstein, JL.The myths of disaster education. Ann Emerg Med. 2006;47:5052.Google Scholar
9.Roccaforte, JD.The World Trade Center attack. Observations from New York's Bellevue Hospital. Crit Care. 2001;5:307309.Google Scholar
10. AHA Hospital Preparedness for Mass Casualties. Health Connect Web site. 2000. http://www.hospitalconnect.com/ahapolicyforum/resources/disaster.html. Accessed January 21, 2008.Google Scholar
11.Kelen, GD, Kraus, CK, McCarthy, ML, et alInpatient disposition classification for the creation of hospital surge capacity: a multiphase study. Lancet. 2006;368:19841990.Google Scholar
12.Cone, DC, Weir, SD, Bogucki, S.Convergent volunteerism. Ann Emerg Med. 2003;41:457462.Google Scholar
13.Einav, S, Aharonson-Daniel, L, Weissman, C, et alIn-hospital resource utilization during multiple casualty incidents. Ann Surg. 2006;243:533540.Google Scholar
14.Hogan, DE, Waeckerle, JF, Dire, DJ, et alEmergency department impact of the Oklahoma City terrorist bombing. Ann Emerg Med. 1999;34:160166.Google Scholar
15.Dacey, MJ.Tragedy and response—the Rhode Island nightclub disaster. New Engl J Med. 2003;349:19901991.Google Scholar
16.Gutierrez de Ceballos, JP, Turegano Fuentes, F, Perez Diaz, D, et alCasualties treated at the closest hospital in the Madrid, March 11, terrorist bombings. Crit Care Med. 2005;33 (suppl 1)S107S112.Google Scholar