No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Evaluation of the Opinions of Volunteers Involved in Disaster on the Use of Social Media
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 24 March 2025
Abstract
Objective
The aim was to deeply examine the opinions of volunteers who took part in the Kahramanmaraş-centered earthquakes that occurred in Türkiye on February 6, 2023, regarding the use of social media during the disaster period.
Methods
The study was designed as qualitative research. Because it was planned to examine the participant experiences in depth, the phenomenological design was employed in the study. Study data were collected from individuals who had earthquake experience through a semi-structured interview form between May 2023 and July 2023.
Results
In line with the data obtained, 2 themes were created: “social media content and communication analysis” and “social media impact analysis and results.” It was found that for information seeking, information sharing, or interaction during disasters, Twitter (X), Instagram, and WhatsApp were the most preferred social media platforms, respectively. Participants mentioned that posts related to disaster during times of disasters have an impact on their emotions. It was determined that the proper use and correct management of social media tools in times of earthquakes affect coordination and relief efforts.
Conclusions
It was concluded that the type of content shared during earthquake times affects both disaster victims and other individuals of the society positively or negatively.
- Type
- Original Research
- Information
- Copyright
- © The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Society for Disaster Medicine and Public Health, Inc.
References
Rautela, P. Redefining disaster: need for managing accidents as disasters. Disaster Prev Manage. 2006;15(5):799–809.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
AFAD. Açıklamalı Afet Yönetimi Terimleri Sözlüğü. Published Accessed August 6, 2023. https://www.afad.gov.tr/aciklamali-afet-yonetimi-terimleri-sozlugu.Google Scholar
Pathirage, C, Seneviratne, K, Amaratunga, D, et al. Managing disaster knowledge: Identification of knowledge factors and challenges. Int J Disaster Resil Built Environ. 2012;3(3):237–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lauras, M, Benaben, F, Truptil, S, et al. Event-cloud platform to support decision-making in emergency management. Inf Syst Front. 2015;17(4):857–869.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shandraseharan, A, Kulatunga, U. Social media for disaster management: The Sri Lankan context. Int J Constr Manag. 2023;23(4):648–655.Google Scholar
Kim, K, Jung, K, Chilton, K. Strategies of social media use in disaster management: Lessons in resilience from Seoul, South Korea. Int J Emerg Serv. 2016;5(2):110–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chik, A. Digital gaming and social networking: English teachers’ perceptions, attitudes and experiences. Pedag. 2011;6(2):154–166.Google Scholar
Ogie, RI, Clarke, RJ, Forehead, H, et al. Crowdsourced social media data for disaster management: Lessons from the PetaJakarta.org project. Comput Environ Urban Syst. 2019;73:108–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yigitcanlar, T, Regona, M, Kankanamge, N, et al. Detecting natural hazard-related disaster impacts with social media analytics: The case of Australian states and territories. Sustainability. 2022;14(2):810.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dutta, R, Basnayake, S. Gap assessment towards strengthening early warning systems. Int J Disaster Resil Built Environ. 2018;9(2):198–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reuter, C, Hughes, AL, Kaufhold, MA. Social media in crisis management: An evaluation and analysis of crisis informatics research. Int J Hum Comput Interact. 2018;34(4):280–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, C, Fan, C, Yao, W, et al. Social media for intelligent public information and warning in disasters: An interdisciplinary review. Int J Inf Manage. 2019;49:190–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xiao, Y, Huang, Q, Wu, K. Understanding social media data for disaster management. Nat Hazards. 2015;79(3):1663–1679.Google Scholar
Kryvasheyeu, Y, Chen, H, Obradovich, N, et al. Rapid assessment of disaster damage using social media activity. Sci Adv. 2016;2(3):e1500779.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Palen, L, Vieweg, S, Liu, SB, et al. Crisis in a networked World: features of computer-mediated communication in the April 16, 2007, Virginia Tech Event. Soc Sci Comput Rev. 2009;27(4):467–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharp, EN, Carter, H. Examination of how social media can inform the management of volunteers during a flood disaster. J Flood Risk Manag. 2020;13(4):e12665CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kankanamge, N, Yigitcanlar, T, Goonetilleke, A. How engaging are disaster management related social media channels? The case of Australian state emergency organisations. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct. 2020;48:101571.Google Scholar
Memiş, L, Babaoğlu, C. Acil durum ve afet yönetiminde süreç yaklaşımı ve teknoloji. Omer Halisdemir Universitesi Iktisadi ve Idari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi. 2020;13(4):776–791.Google Scholar
Usta, E, Yükseler, M. Afetlerde sosyal medya kullanımı ve etik ikilemler: İzmir Seferihisar depremi örneği. J Disaster Risk. 2021;4(2):249–269.Google Scholar
Granell, C, Ostermann, FO. Beyond data collection: objectives and methods of research using VGI and geo-social media for disaster management. Comput Environ Urban Syst. 2016;59:231–243.Google Scholar
Liu, BF, Fraustino, JD, Jin, Y. Social media use during disasters: How information form and source influence intended behavioral responses. Communic Res. 2016;43(5):626–646.Google Scholar
Nahkur, O, Orru, K, Hansson, S, et al. The engagement of informal volunteers in disaster management in Europe. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct. 2022;83:103413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexander, DE. Social media in disaster risk reduction and crisis management. Sci Eng Ethics. 2014;20(3):717–733.Google ScholarPubMed
Kavaklı, N. Üniversite öğrencilerinin arasında internet teyit/ doğrulama platformlarının kullanımı. J Soc Sci. 2019;18(69):398–411.Google Scholar
Soğukdere, Ş, Öztunç, M. Sosyal medyada koronavirüs dezenformasyonu. Kastamonu İletişim Araştırmaları Dergisi. 2020;5:59–85.Google Scholar
İri, R. 2023 Türkiye deprem sürecinde yaşanan ve gelişen olaylarda sosyal medya kullanımının önemi: Niğde ve yöresi sosyal medya kullanıcılarına yönelik bir araştırma. Uşak Üniversitesi Uygulamalı Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi. 2023;3(1):44–66.Google Scholar
Tuohy, D, Cooney, A, Dowling, M, et al. An overview of interpretive phenomenology as a research methodology. Nurse Res. 2013;20(6):17–20.Google ScholarPubMed
Dupin, CM, Larsson, M, Dariel, O, et al. Conceptions of learning research: Variations amongst French and Swedish nurses. A phenomenographic study. Nurse Educ Today. 2015;35(1):73–79.Google ScholarPubMed
Creswell, JW, Poth, CN. Qualitative Inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage Publications; 2016.Google Scholar
Braun, V, Clarke, V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77–101.Google Scholar
Creswell, JW. Nitel araştırma yöntemleri: Beş yaklaşıma göre nitel araştırma ve araştırma deseni. Ankara: Siyasal Kitabevi; 2018.Google Scholar
Johnson, B, Christiansen, L. Eğitim araştırmaları nicel, nitel ve karma yaklaşımlar. Ankara: Eğiten Kitap; 2014.Google Scholar
Polit, DF, Beck, CTB. Nursing research: Generating and assessing evidence for nursing practice. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2008.Google Scholar
Yıldırım, A, Şimşek, H. Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri . Genişletilmiş 9. Baskı. Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık; 2013.Google Scholar
Tong, A, Sainsbury, P, Craig, J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care. 2007;19(6):349–357.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Merriam, BS, Tisdell, JE. Qualitative research: A Guide to design and implementation. John Wiley & Sons; 2016.Google Scholar
Guba, EG, Lincoln, YS. Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions, and emerging confluences. In: Denzin, NK, Lincoln, YS, eds, The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research. Sage Publications; 2005:191–215.Google Scholar
Valenzuela, S, Puente, S, Flores, PM. Comparing disaster news on twitter and television: An intermedia agenda setting perspective. J Broadcast Electron Media. 2017;61(4):615–637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Takahashi, B, Tandoc, EC, Carmichael, C. Communicating on twitter during a disaster: An analysis of tweets during Typhoon Haiyan in the Philippines. Comput Human Behav. 2015;50:392–398.Google Scholar
Alam, F, Ofli, F, CrisisMMD, Imran M.: Multimodal twitter datasets from natural disasters. Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media. 2018;12(1):465–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mendoza, M, Poblete, B, Castillo, C. Twitter under crisis: Can we trust what we RT? SOMA 2010 - Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on Social Media Analytics. 2010:71–79.Google Scholar
Çanakçi, M, Şaşmazlar, C, Öztürk, S. Afet ve kriz yönetiminde sosyal medyanın kullanımı üzerine bir araştırma: Twitter örneği. Gümüşhane Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi. 2022;11(3):882–897.Google Scholar
Sallan Gül, S, Kahya Nizam, Ö. Doğal afetlerde sosyal medya kullanımı: 2023 Kahramanmaraş depremi özelinde twitter örneği. İnsanat Sanat Tasarım ve Mimarlık Araştırmaları Dergisi. 2023;3(1):140–165.Google Scholar
Mavi, EE. Afet kriz yönetiminde medya: 30 Ekim 2020 İzmir depremi. Karadeniz Teknik Üniversitesi İletişim Araştırmaları Dergisi. 2020;10(2):31–53.Google Scholar
Kusumasari, B, Prabowo, NPA. Scraping social media data for disaster communication: How the pattern of Twitter users affects disasters in Asia and the Pacific. Nat Hazards. 2020;103(3):3415–3435.Google Scholar
Marwick, AE, Boyd, D. I tweet honestly, I tweet passionately: Twitter users, context collapse, and the imagined audience. New Media Soc. 2010;13(1):114–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burnap, P, Rana, OF, Avis, N, et al. Detecting tension in online communities with computational Twitter analysis. Technol Forecast Soc Change. 2015;95:96–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jung, K, Park, HW. Tracing interorganizational information networks during emergency response period: A webometric approach to the 2012 Gumi chemical spill in South Korea. Gov Inf Q. 2016;33(1):133–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Panagiotopoulos, P, Barnett, J, Bigdeli, AZ, et al. Social media in emergency management: Twitter as a tool for communicating risks to the public. Technol Forecast Soc Change. 2016;111:86–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dwarakanath, L, Kamsin, A, Rasheed, RA, et al. Automated machine learning approaches for emergency response and coordination via social media in the aftermath of a disaster: A Review. IEEE Access. 2021;9:68917–68931.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zincir, O, Yazıcı, S. Kriz yönetimi ve afetlerde sosyal medya kullanımı. İstanbul Üniversitesi Siyasal Bilgiler Fakültesi Dergisi. 2013;49:65–82.Google Scholar
Doğuç, O. Twitter verisi ile doğal afet müdahale süreci için karar destek uygulaması. J Disaster Risk. 2022;5(2):408–419.Google Scholar
Zeimpekis, V, Ichoua, S, Minis, I. Humanitarian and relief logistics: Research issues, case studies and future trends. Springer; 2013.Google Scholar
Gao, H, Barbier, G, Goolsby, R. Harnessing the crowdsourcing power of social media for disaster relief. IEEE Intell Syst. 2011;26(3):10–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cameron, MA, Power, R, Robinson, B, et al. Emergency situation awareness from twitter for crisis management. WWW’12 - Proceedings of the 21st Annual Conference on World Wide Web Companion. 2012:695–698.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ullah, I, Khan, S, Imran, M, et al. RweetMiner: automatic identification and categorization of help requests on twitter during disasters. Expert Syst Appl. 2021;176:114787.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simon, T, Goldberg, A, Adini, B. Socializing in emergencies—a review of the use of social media in emergency situations. Int J Inf Manage. 2015;35(5):609–619.Google Scholar
Martínez-Rojas, M, Pardo-Ferreira, M del C, Rubio-Romero, JC. Twitter as a tool for the management and analysis of emergency situations: A systematic literature review. Int J Inf Manage. 2018;43:196–208.Google Scholar
Karmegam, D, Ramamoorthy, T, Mappillairajan, B. A Systematic review of techniques employed for determining mental health using social media in psychological surveillance during disasters. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2020;14(2):265–272.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
MacIas, W, Hilyard, K, Freimuth, V. Blog functions as risk and crisis communication during hurricane Katrina. J Comput Mediat Commun. 2009;15(1):1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Qu, Y, Huang, C, Zhang, P, et al. Microblogging after a major disaster in China. Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, CSCW. 2011:25–34.Google Scholar
Neubaum, G, Rösner, L, Rosenthal-Von Der Pütten, AM, et al. Psychosocial functions of social media usage in a disaster situation: a multi-methodological approach. Comput Human Behav. 2014;34:28–38.Google Scholar
Vevea, NN, Littlefield, RS, Fudge, J, et al. Portrayals of Dominance: Local newspaper coverage of a natural disaster. Visual Communication Quarterly. 2011;18(2):84–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mortensen, TM, Hull, K, Boling, KS. Really social disaster: An examination of photo sharing on twitter during the #SCFlood. Vis Commun Q. 2017;24(4):219–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aladwani, AM. Facilitators, characteristics, and impacts of Twitter use: Theoretical analysis and empirical illustration. Int J Inf Manage. 2015;35(1):15–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landwehr, PM, Wei, W, Kowalchuck, M, et al. Using tweets to support disaster planning, warning and response. Saf Sci. 2016;90:33–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carley, KM, Malik, M, Landwehr, PM, et al. Crowd sourcing disaster management: The complex nature of Twitter usage in Padang Indonesia. Saf Sci. 2016;90:48–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laylavi, F, Rajabifard, A, Kalantari, M. Event relatedness assessment of twitter messages for emergency response. Inf Process Manag. 2017;53(1):266–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar