Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T07:52:08.605Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Ebola-Related Health Information Wanted and Obtained by Nurses and Public Health Department Employees: Effects of Formal and Informal Communication Channels

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 July 2019

Bo Xie*
Affiliation:
School of Nursing & School of Information, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas
Le (Betty) Zhou
Affiliation:
Department of Work and Organizations, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
Linda H. Yoder
Affiliation:
School of Nursing, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas
Karen E. Johnson
Affiliation:
School of Nursing, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas
Alexandra Garcia
Affiliation:
School of Nursing, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas
Miyong Kim
Affiliation:
School of Nursing, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas
*
Correspondence and reprint requests to: Bo Xie, The University of Texas at Austin School of Nursing, 1710 Red River Street, Austin, TX 78712 (e-mail: [email protected]).

Abstract

Objectives:

The aim of this study was to (1) understand types and amounts of Ebola-related information that health organization employees wanted and obtained through formal, informal, internal, and external organizational communication channels; (2) determine potential discrepancies between information wanted and obtained; and (3) investigate how organizational structure might affect information wanted and obtained through these communication channels.

Methods:

Primary data were collected from 526 health workers in 9 hospitals and 13 public health departments in Texas from June to November 2015. Survey data were collected for 7 types of Ebola-related information health organization employees wanted and obtained through various types of organizational communication channels. Descriptive statistical analyses, mixed design analysis of variance, regression analyses, and multilevel analyses were used to analyze the data.

Results:

Hospital employees (mostly nurses in our sample) received more self-care information than they wanted from every communication channel. However, they received less about all other types of information than they wanted from every communication channel separately and combined. Public health department employees wanted more information than they received from every communication channel separately and combined for all 7 types of information.

Conclusions:

Discrepancies existed between the types of Ebola-related information wanted and obtained by employees of hospitals and public health departments.

Type
Original Research
Copyright
Copyright © 2019 Society for Disaster Medicine and Public Health, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2014-2016 Ebola Outbreak in West Africa. https://www.cdc.gov/vhf/ebola/history/2014-2016-outbreak/index.html. Accessed May 30, 2019).Google Scholar
Gesser-Edelsburg, A, Shir-Raz, Y, Haiek, S, et al. What does the public know about Ebola? The public’s risk perceptions regarding the current Ebola in an as-yet unaffected country. Am J Infect Control. 2015;43(7):669675.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gulati, R, Mayo, AJ, Nohria, N. Management: An Integrated Approach. Boston, MA: Cengage Learning; 2014.Google Scholar
Zmud, RW, Lind, MR, Young, FW. An attribute space for organizational communication channels. Inf Syst Res. 1990;1(4):440457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Avery, EJ. Public information officers’ social media monitoring during the Zika virus crisis, a global health threat surrounded by public uncertainty. Public Relat Rev. 2017;43(3):468476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crook, B, Glowacki, EM, Suran, M, et al. Content analysis of a live CDC Twitter chat during the 2014 Ebola outbreak. Commun Res Rep. 2016;33(4):349355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gesser-Edelsburg, A, Shir-Raz, Y. Risk Communication and Infectious Diseases in an Age of Digital Media. New York: Routledge, Taylor & Francis; 2017.Google Scholar
Gesser-Edelsburg, A, Shir-Raz, Y, Walter, N, et al. The public sphere in emerging infectious disease communication: recipient or active and vocal partner? Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2015;9(4):447458.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Henrich, N, Holmes, B. Communicating during a pandemic: information the public wants about the disease and new vaccines and drugs. Health Promot Pract. 2011;12(4):610619.10.1177/1524839910363536CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McNab, C. What social media offers to health professionals and citizens. Bull World Health Organ. 2009;87(8):566.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Strekalova, YA. Emergent health risks and audience information engagement on social media. Am J Infect Control. 2016;44(3):363365.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brass, DJ, Galaskiewicz, J, Greve, HR, et al. Taking stock of networks and organizations: a multilevel perspective. Acad Manage J. 2004;47(6):795817. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2092683 Google Scholar
Burt, RS. Toward a Structural Theory of Action. New York: Academic Press; 1982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Granovetter, MS. 1973. The strength of weak ties. Am J Sociol. 1973;78(6):13601380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hage, J, Aiken, M. Routine technology, social structure, and organization goals. Admin Sci Q. 1969;14(3):366376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pugh, DS, Hickson, DJ, Hinings, CR, et al. Dimensions of organization structure. Admin Sci Q. 1968;13(1):65105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xie, B, Wang, M, Feldman, R, et al. 2010. Health information and decision-making preferences in the internet age: a pilot study using the Health Information Wants (HIW) Questionnaire. In: Proceedings of the 1st ACM International Health Informatics Symposium. New York: ACM; 2010:610619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xie, B, Wang, M, Feldman, R, et al. Internet use frequency and patient-centered care: measuring patient preferences for participation using the Health Information Wants Questionnaire. J Med Internet Res. 2013;15(7):e132.10.2196/jmir.2615CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Xie, B, Wang, M, Feldman, R, et al. Exploring older and younger adults’ preferences for health information and participation in decision making using the Health Information Wants Questionnaire (HIWQ). Health Expect. 2014;17(6):795808.10.1111/j.1369-7625.2012.00804.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xie, B. Older adults’ health information wants in the internet age: implications for patient–provider relationships. J Health Commun. 2009;14(6):510524.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Xie, B, Wang, M, Feldman, R. Preferences for health information and decision-making: development of the Health Information Wants (HIW) Questionnaire. In: Proceedings of the 2011 iConference. New York: ACM; 2011:273280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schminke, M, Cropanzano, R, Rupp, DE. Organization structure and fairness perceptions: the moderating effects of organizational level. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 2002;89(1):881905.10.1016/S0749-5978(02)00034-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mays, GP, Smith, SA, Ingram, RC, et al. Public health delivery systems: evidence, uncertainty, and emerging research needs. Am J Prev Med. 2009;36(3):256265.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mays, GP, Scutchfield, FD. Improving public health system performance through multiorganizational partnerships. Prev Chronic Dis. 2010;7(6):A116.Google ScholarPubMed