Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T08:17:31.119Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Disaster Coverage Predication for the Emerging Tethered Balloon Technology: Capability for Preparedness, Detection, Mitigation, and Response

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 August 2017

Saeed H. Alsamhi ,
Mohd Samar Ansari  and
Navin S. Rajput
Saeed H. Alsamhi*
Affiliation:
Department of Electronics Engineering, AMU and IBB University, Ibb, Yemen
Mohd Samar Ansari
Affiliation:
Department of Electronics Engineering, Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh, India
Navin S. Rajput
Affiliation:
Department of Electronics Engineering, IIT (BHU), Varanasi, India
*
Correspondence and reprint requests to Saeed Hamood Ahmed Alsamhi, Department of Electronics Engineering, AMU and IBB University, Ibb, Yemen (e-mail: [email protected]).
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective

A disaster is a consequence of natural hazards and terrorist acts, which have significant potential to disrupt the entire wireless communication infrastructure. Therefore, the essential rescue squads and recovery operations during a catastrophic event will be severely debilitated. To provide efficient communication services, and to reduce casualty mortality and morbidity during the catastrophic events, we proposed the Tethered Balloon technology for disaster preparedness, detection, mitigation, and recovery assessment.

Methods

The proposed Tethered Balloon is applicable to any type of disaster except for storms. The Tethered Balloon is being actively researched and developed as a simple solution to improve the performance of rescues, facilities, and services of emergency medical communication in the disaster area. The most important requirement for rescue and relief teams during or after the disaster is a high quality of service of delivery communication services to save people’s lives.

Results

Using our proposed technology, we report that the Tethered Balloon has a large disaster coverage area. Therefore, the rescue and research teams are given higher priority, and their performance significantly improved in the particular coverage area.

Conclusions

Tethered Balloon features made it suitable for disaster preparedness, mitigation, and recovery. The performance of rescue and relief teams was effective and efficient before and after the disaster as well as can be continued to coordinate the relief teams until disaster recovery. (Disaster Med Public Health Preparedness. 2018;12:222–231)

Keywords

Tethered Balloon technologydisaster mitigationpreparednessrescues and researchdisaster coverage area
Type
Original Research
Information
Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness , Volume 12 , Issue 2 , April 2018 , pp. 222 - 231
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Disaster Medicine and Public Health, Inc. 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Komnakos, D, Vouyioukas, D, Maglogiannis, I, Constantinou, P. Performance evaluation of an enhanced uplink 3.5 G system for mobile healthcare applications. Int J Telemed Appl. 2008;2008:1-11.Google Scholar
2. Lee, Y-M, Ku, B-l, Ahn, D-S. A satellite core network system for emergency management and disaster recovery. 2010 International Conference on Information and Communication Technology Convergence (ICTC); 2010, pp. 549-552.Google Scholar
3. Dinas, PC, Mueller, C, Clark, N, et al. Innovative methods for the benefit of public health using space technologies for disaster response. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2015;9:319-328.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4. Yoo, J. Performance evaluation of voice over IP on WiMAX and Wi-Fi based networks. ENSC 427: Communication Networks; 2009. http://www2.ensc.sfu.ca/~ljilja/ENSC427/Spring09/Projects/team1/ensc427-finalreport.pdf.Google Scholar
5. Kobilarov, M. Aerospace technology for disaster relief. Disaster Medicine Public Health Prep. 2015;9:225-227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Ma, O, Ortega, CE, Ruble, K, Lu, Q. Multi-degree-of-freedom test stand for unmanned air vehicles. Google Patents; 2013. U.S. Patent 8353199, issued January 15, 2013.Google Scholar
7. Deaton, JD. High altitude platforms for disaster recovery: capabilities, strategies, and techniques for emergency telecommunications. EURASIP J Wirel Commun Netw. 2008;2008:1-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Alsamhi, SH, Rajput, NS. Implementation of call admission control technique in HAP for enhanced QoS in wireless network deployment. Telecommun Sys. 2015;63(2):141-151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Alsamhi, S, Rajput, N. An efficient channel reservation technique for improved QoS for mobile communication deployment using high altitude platform. Wirel Personal Communications. 2016;91:1095-1108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Alsamhi, SH, Rajput, NS. An intelligent hand-off algorithm to enhance quality of service in high altitude platforms using neural network. Wireless Pers Commun. 2015;82:2059-2073.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Likitthanasate, P, Grace, D, Mitchell, P. Coexistence performance of high altitude platform and terrestrial systems sharing a common downlink WiMAX frequency band. Electron Lett. 2005;41:858-860.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Ahmed, BT. WiMAX in high altitude platforms (HAPs) communications. 2006 European Conference on Wireless Technology, 2006.Google Scholar
13. Alsamhi, SH, Rajput, NS. Efficient cooperative HAPS-terrestrial WiMAX system. Presented at the International Conference on Advances in Electrical, Electronics and Computer Engineering; Moradabad, India, 2014.Google Scholar
14. Mohorcic, M, Grace, D, Kandus, G, Tozer, T. Broadband communications from aerial platform networks. IST Mobile Summit, Lyon; 2004.Google Scholar
15. Mohammed, A, Arnon, S, Grace, D, Mondin, M, Miura, R. Advanced communication techniques and applications for high-altitude platforms. EURASIP J Wirel Commun Netw. 2008;2008:1-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16. Deaton, JD. High altitude platforms for disaster recovery: capabilities, strategies, and techniques for emergency telecommunications. EURASIP J Wirel Commun Netw. 2008;2008:1-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17. Khaleefa, S, Alsamhi, S, Rajput, N. Tethered balloon technology for telecommunication, coverage and path loss. 2014 IEEE Students’ Conference on Electrical, Electronics and Computer Science (SCEECS); 2014, pp. 1-4.Google Scholar
18. Alsamhi, SH, Rajput, NS. An intelligent HAP for broadband wireless communications: developments, QoS and applications. Int J Electron Electr Eng. 2015;3:134-143.Google Scholar
19. Lee, Y, Ku, B, Ahn, D. Public protection and disaster relief by satellite-based communication network. 3rd International Conference on Advances in Satellite and Space Communications; 2011, pp. 17-22.Google Scholar
20. Gallardo, AR, Djalali, A, Foletti, M, et al. Core competencies in disaster management and humanitarian assistance: a systematic review. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2015;9:430-439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21. Tauqeer, A, Shahid, Y, Rasool, CS. Link fault tolerable network topology for network services provision in disaster area. Res J Recent Sci. 2014;3:58-68.Google Scholar
22. Pace, P, Aloi, G. Disaster monitoring and mitigation using aerospace technologies and integrated telecommunication networks. IEEE Aerosp Electron Syst Mag. 2008;23:3-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23. Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), US Department of Homeland Security. Disaster Emergency Communications. Updated March 23, 2016. http://www.fema.gov/disaster-emergency-communications.Google Scholar
24. Qiantori, A, Sutiono, AB, Hariyanto, H, Suwa, H, Ohta, T. An emergency medical communications system by low altitude platform at the early stages of a natural disaster in Indonesia. J Med Syst. 2012;36:41-52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
25. García-Crespillo, O, Nossek, E, Winterstein, A, Belabbas, B, Meurer, M. Use of high altitude platform systems to augment ground based APNT systems. 2015 IEEE/AIAA 34th on Digital Avionics Systems Conference (DASC); 2015, pp. 2A3-1-2A3-9.Google Scholar
26. Alsamhi, S, Rajput, N. Performance and analysis of propagation models for efficient handoff in high altitude platform system to sustain QoS. 2014 IEEE Students’ Conference on Electrical, Electronics and Computer Science (SCEECS); 2014, pp. 1-6.Google Scholar
27. Hariyanto, H, Santoso, H, Widiawan, AK. Emergency broadband access network using low altitude platform. 2009 International Conference on Instrumentation, Communications, Information Technology, and Biomedical Engineering (ICICI-BME); 2009, pp. 1-6.Google Scholar
28. Nelson, RC. Flight stability and automatic control. Vol 2. New York: WCB/McGraw Hill; 1998.Google Scholar
29. El-Disi, A. A thesis on utilizing high altitude platforms (HAPs) to provide wireless communications coverage to close coverage gaps-case study: providing UMTS service to the non-radar coverage area in the Gulf of Mexico (GOMEX); 2010. Master’s thesis, Washington University in St. Louis, pp. 1-118.Google Scholar
30. Komerath, N. An imaging, communications and beamed power architecture for first responders. Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Wireless Technologies for Humanitarian Relief; 2011, pp. 421-428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
31. Graeter, WF. Tethered balloon transport system: a proposal. DTIC Document; 1978. Master’s thesis, Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, CA, accession number ADA057341.Google Scholar