Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T01:17:08.101Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Deployment of Medical Relief Teams of the Indian Army in the Aftermath of the Nepal Earthquake: Lessons Learned

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 December 2016

Ashutosh Chauhan*
Affiliation:
Department of Surgery, Army College of Medical Sciences, Delhi, India
Bhushan Kumar Chopra
Affiliation:
Office of Director General Armed Forces Medical Services, Delhi, India.
*
Correspondence and reprint requests to Dr Ashutosh Chauhan, Department of Surgery, Army College Medical Sciences, Delhi, India (e-mail: [email protected]).

Abstract

In April 2015 a 7.8-magnitude earthquake hit Nepal. As part of relief operations named Operation Maitri, the Indian Armed Forces deployed 3 field hospitals in the disaster zone. Rapid deployment of mobile surgical teams to far-flung, inaccessible areas was done by helicopters. In an operational deployment spanning 1 month, a total of 7532 patients were treated and 105 surgeries were carried out on 83 patients. One-fifth of the patients were less than 18 years of age. One-third of the patients had traumatic injuries directly attributable to the earthquake, whereas the remaining patients were treated for diseases of poor sanitation and hygiene as well as chronic illness that had been neglected owing to the collapse of the local health infrastructure. Cases of traumatic injuries directly related to the earthquake were seen maximally on the 5th day after the index event but tapered off rapidly by the 10th day. Nontraumatic illness required more attention thereafter and a need was felt for separate child health and reproductive health services later in the mission. Although immediate management of injuries and surgical intervention in selected cases was possible, ensuring long-term care and rehabilitation of cases proved problematic. This was especially so for spinal injury cases. Data capturing by a paper-based system was found to be inadequate. The lessons learned from this mission have led to a reimagining of the composition of future relief operations. Apart from mobile surgical teams, on which conventional field hospitals are generally centered, a separate section for preventive medicine and child and maternal services is needed. (Disaster Med Public Health Preparedness. 2017;11:394–398)

Type
Report from the Field
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Disaster Medicine and Public Health, Inc. 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Nepal: Official figures for casualties and damage (MoHA/NEOC Official Figures). https://data.hdx.rwlabs.org/dataset/official-figures-for-casualties-and-damage. Date published June 5, 2015.Google Scholar
2. Malish, R, Oliver, DE, Rush, RM Jr, et al. Potential roles of military-specific response to natural disasters — analysis of the rapid deployment of a mobile surgical team to the 2007 Peruvian earthquake. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2009;24(01):3-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1049023X00006464.Google Scholar
3. von Schreeb, J, Riddez, L, Samnegård, H, et al. Foreign field hospitals in the recent sudden-onset disasters in Iran, Haiti, Indonesia, and Pakistan. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2008;23(02):144-151. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1049023X00005768.Google Scholar
4. Haley, TF, DeLorenzo, RA. Military medical assistance following natural disasters: refining the rapid response. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2009;24(01):9-10. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1049023X00006476.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5. Bar-Dayan, Y, Mankuta, D, Wolf, Y, et al. An earthquake disaster in Turkey: an overview of the experience of the Israeli Defence Forces Field Hospital in Adapazari. Disasters. 2000;24(3):262-270. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-7717.00147.Google Scholar
6. Merin, O, Ash, N, Levy, G, et al. The Israeli field hospital in Haiti —ethical dilemmas in early disaster response. N Engl J Med. 2010;362(11):e38. http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMp1001693.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7. Amundson, D, Dadekian, G, Etienne, M, et al. Practicing internal medicine onboard the USNS COMFORT in the aftermath of the Haitian earthquake. Ann Intern Med. 2010;152(11):733-737. http://dx.doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-152-11-201006010-00215.Google Scholar
8. Walk, RM, Donahue, TF, Stockinger, Z, et al. Haitian earthquake relief: disaster response aboard the USNS comfort. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2012;6(04):370-377. http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/dmp.2012.67.Google Scholar
9. Kaim Khani, GM, Baig, A, Humail, M, et al. Musculoskeletal injuries among victims of the Battagram, Pakistan earthquake in October 2005. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2012;27(05):489-491. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1049023X12001161.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed