Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-19T14:50:10.024Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Anthrax Attacks: Lessons Learned On The 10th Anniversary of the Anthrax Attacks

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 April 2013

Thomas K. Zink*
Affiliation:
Institute for Biosecurity, Saint Louis University
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Letters to the Editor
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Disaster Medicine and Public Health, Inc. 2011

To the Editor: With the 10-year anniversary of the multiwave, multisite, lethal anthrax attacks, it makes sense to reflect on the lessons that have been learned from this experience and assess current priorities on biodefense preparedness and community resilience. What follows are the observations of a physician who has evolved from an emergency medicine (response-based) posture to one of protecting the health of the community through smart policy and preventive services.

It is interesting to note the abundance of information logged before October 2001 about anthrax as an important threat. There is the World Health Organization 1970 estimate that 250 000 people would die following the theoretical aircraft release of 50 kg of anthrax over an urban population of 5 million.1 This is followed up by a 1993 report from the US Congressional Office of Technology Assessment that estimates that up to 3 million deaths could follow the release of 100 kg of anthrax spores upwind of Washington, DC, thereby matching the lethality of a hydrogen bomb.2 Then there is the 1999 JAMA Consensus Statement from the Working Group on Civilian Biodefense on biological threats.Reference Inglesby, Henderson and Bartlett3 This landmark effort presented several important attributes of the anthrax weapon that are worth repeating.

Anthrax powder is odorless and invisible and can travel many kilometers before dissipating.1Reference Simon4 After an outdoor release of anthrax, people indoors could be similarly threatened as those outdoors.Reference Cristy and Chester5 Inhaling spore-bearing particles of 1 to 5 μm into the alveolar spaces of the lung is the most deadly form of anthrax disease.Reference Hatch6 In addition, the Working Group takes special care to point out that, “Antibiotic resistance to penicillin- and tetracycline-class antibiotics should be assumed,” and reminds the reader that natural resistance of Bacillus anthracis strains exists against sulfamethoxazole, trimethoprim, cefuroxime, cefotaxime sodium, aztreonam, and ceftazidime. Finally, these experts promote prevention with their advice to consider the vaccination of some essential service personnel if and when increased production capacity could make vaccine available.

After the 2001 anthrax letters attacks, even more information has become available. For example, in the Hart Senate Office Building attack on Senator Tom Daschle's staff, 6 of 9 hazardous materials professionals were infected despite donning personal protective equipment (PPE).Reference Doolan, Freilich and Brice7 This attack did have a defined hot zone, but because anthrax is easily reaerosolized,Reference Webb8 the safe zone in which to don the PPE could not be demarcated, and in a wide-area anthrax release, the hot zone will be unknown. PPE is not fail-safe.

Antibiotic-resistant anthrax and vaccine supply are 2 points worth further examination. Articles in the recent medical literature have explored the issue of antibiotic resistance in the anthrax microorganism. Five separate research groups have demonstrated that with simple microbiological techniques, anthrax can be made resistant to all of the antibiotics designed to treat the anthrax infection. The most comprehensive study demonstrated that anthrax could be made resistant to 18 different antimicrobials, including all the antibiotics in the Strategic National Stockpile (SNS).Reference Athamna, Athamna, Abu-Rashed, Medlej, Bast and Rubinstein9 This multidrug resistance issue is addressed exhaustively in the US Department of Health and Human Services Aerosolized Anthrax Response Playbook.10 Response-biased planning falls short and does not hardwire preexposure vaccination strategies to match the microbiological science, however. Case-fatality estimates for inhalation anthrax are extremely high, approximately 75%, even with appropriate antibiotics and supportive care.11 Imagine the carnage if no civilian emergency responders were vaccinated and the anthrax weapon is resistant to antibiotics.

Continuing this policy is fundamentally unscientific. No vaccine can be expected to confer immunity once victims are exposed and/or infected. Instead, it is prudent to heed the prescient advice of the 1999 Working Group on Civilian Biodefense and embrace the 2010 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices' final recommendation, which supports offering the anthrax vaccine, “for persons involved in emergency response activities including but not limited to, police departments, fire departments, hazardous material units, government responders, and the National Guard.”12

Regarding vaccine supply, in 1999, manufacturing capacity was spotty and all of the vaccine doses were promised to the Department of Defense. Twelve years later, ample vaccine is available to begin protecting essential service personnel. The manufacturer is consistently producing 8 to 9 million doses each year (K. Connolly, personal communication, March 2010). Moreover, 500 000 doses of the anthrax vaccine in the SNS are being destroyed every month because their shelf life has expired. This is a waste of approximately $180 million/y. Rather than being allowed to expire, these doses could be rotated out and offered to emergency responders and other personnel at high risk to anthrax bioterrorism. The currently licensed vaccination regimen is 5 doses for 18 months with annual boosters but the Food and Drug Administration is reviewing a change to a 3-dose series with a booster every 3 years. With this new schedule, 2 million emergency responders could be vaccinated with 1 year's worth of discarded SNS vaccine.

The anthrax vaccine is licensed by the Food and Drug Administration as effective and safe.13 More than 2.5 million people have received more than 10 million doses of the anthrax vaccine. The Institute of Medicine states that the rate of adverse events for this vaccine is similar to rates in other adult vaccines (influenza, hepatitis A virus, tetanus).Reference Grabenstein14 In a study of 1 349 327 doses administered to more than 400 000 subjects, the rate of adverse events was 1 in 25 000 injections and the chance of a serious adverse event (disability, hospitalization, threat to survival, or death) was 1 in 200 000 injections.Reference Sever, Brenner, Gale, Lyle, Moulton and West15 To put this statement into perspective, a person living 80 years has a 1 in 10 000 chance of being struck by lightning.16 This forces the question, why not use short-dated anthrax vaccine to protect US civilian emergency responders?

The goal is community resilience. The threat is nothing short of antibiotic-resistant anthrax. The solution is to properly equip indispensable emergency responders with voluntary, preventive vaccination before exposure.

References

REFERENCES

1.World Health Organization. Health Aspects of Chemical and Biological Weapons. Geneva: World Health Organization; 1970:98-99.Google Scholar
2.Office of Technology Assessment. US Congress. Proliferation of Weapons of Mass Destruction. Publication OTA-ISC-559. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office; 1993:53-55.Google Scholar
3.Inglesby, TV, Henderson, DA, Bartlett, JGWorking Group on Civilian Biodefense. Anthrax as a biological weapon: medical and public health management. JAMA. 1999;281 (18):17351745.Google Scholar
4.Simon, JD.Biological terrorism. Preparing to meet the threat. JAMA. 1997;278 (5):428430.Google Scholar
5.Cristy, GA, Chester, CV.Emergency Protection Against Aerosols. Publication ORNL-5519. Oak Ridge, TN: Oak Ridge National Laboratory; 1981.Google Scholar
6.Hatch, TF.Distribution and deposition of inhaled particles in respiratory tract. Bacteriol Rev. 1961;25:237240.Google Scholar
7.Doolan, DL, Freilich, DA, Brice, GT.The US capitol bioterrorism anthrax exposures: clinical epidemiological and immunological characteristics. J Infect Dis. 2007;195 (2):174184.Google Scholar
8.Webb, GF.A silent bomb: the risk of anthrax as a weapon of mass destruction. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003;100 (8):43554356.Google Scholar
9.Athamna, A, Athamna, M, Abu-Rashed, N, Medlej, B, Bast, DJ, Rubinstein, E.Selection of Bacillus anthracis isolates resistant to antibiotics. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2004;54 (2):424428.Google Scholar
10.US Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the Assistant Secretary of Preparedness and Response. Aerosolized anthrax response playbook. http://www.phe.gov/Preparedness/planning/playbooks/anthrax/Pages/default.aspx. Published March 14, 2011. Accessed August 12, 2011.Google Scholar
11.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Anthrax Q & A: signs and symptoms. www.bt.cdc.gov/agent/anthrax/faq/signs.asp. Accessed June 1, 2011.Google Scholar
12.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices. Vaccines and immunizations: ACIP provisional recommendations. www.cdc.gov/vaccines/recs/provisional/default.htm. Accessed September 7, 2011.Google Scholar
13.Food and Drug Administration, 2005, Biological Products; Bacterial Vaccines and Toxoids; Implementation of Efficacy Review; Anthrax Vaccine Adsorbed; Final Order. Fed Regist. 2005;70:7518075198.Google Scholar
14.Grabenstein, JD.Vaccines: countering anthrax: vaccines and immunoglobulins. Clin Infect Dis. 2008;46 (1):129136.Google Scholar
15.Sever, JL, Brenner, AI, Gale, AD, Lyle, JM, Moulton, LH, West, DJAnthrax Vaccine Export Committee. Safety of anthrax vaccine: a review by the Anthrax Vaccine Expert Committee (AVEC) of adverse events reported to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS). Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2002;11 (3):189202.Google Scholar
16.National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). National Weather Service. Office of Climate, Water, and Weather Services. Medical aspects of lightning. http://www.lightningsafety.noaa.gov/medical.htm. Accessed June 1, 2011.Google Scholar