Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T11:18:26.340Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Threat of Secondary Chemical Contamination of Emergency Departments and Personnel: An Uncommon but Recurrent Problem

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 November 2015

Theodore C. Larson*
Affiliation:
Division of Toxicology and Human Health Sciences, Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, Atlanta, Georgia
Maureen F. Orr
Affiliation:
Division of Toxicology and Human Health Sciences, Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, Atlanta, Georgia
Erik Auf der Heide
Affiliation:
Division of Toxicology and Human Health Sciences, Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, Atlanta, Georgia
Jennifer Wu
Affiliation:
Division of Toxicology and Human Health Sciences, Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, Atlanta, Georgia
Sutapa Mukhopadhyay
Affiliation:
Communicable and Environmental Diseases and Emergency Preparedness, Tennessee Department of Health, Nashville, Tennessee.
D. Kevin Horton
Affiliation:
Division of Toxicology and Human Health Sciences, Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, Atlanta, Georgia
*
Correspondence and reprint requests to Theodore C. Larson, Division of Toxicology and Human Health Sciences, Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, Atlanta, GA (E-mail: [email protected]).

Abstract

Objective

To analyze acute hazardous substance release surveillance data for events involving secondary contamination of hospital emergency departments (EDs). Secondary contamination of EDs may occur when a patient exposed to a hazardous chemical is not decontaminated before arrival at the ED and when ED staff are not wearing appropriate personal protective equipment. This can result in adverse health outcomes among department personnel, other patients, and visitors. Even events without actual secondary contamination risk can be real in their consequences and require the decontamination of the ED or its occupants, evacuation, or temporary shutdown of the ED.

Methods

Events involving secondary contamination were identified by using the Hazardous Substances Emergency Events Surveillance system and the National Toxic Substance Incidents Program from 2007 to 2013.

Results

Five incidents involving the threat of secondary contamination (0.02% of all events reported to the surveillance systems [n=33,001]) were detected and are described. Four incidents involved suspected secondary contamination in which the facility was evacuated or shut down.

Conclusions

These results suggest that although rare, incidents involving secondary contamination continue to present a hazard for emergency departments. Suggested best practices to avoid secondary contamination have been described. Hospitals should be made aware of the risks associated with secondary contamination and the need to proactively train and equip staff to perform decontamination. (Disaster Med Public Health Preparedness. 2016;10:199–202)

Type
Original Research
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Disaster Medicine and Public Health, Inc. 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Ghilarducci, DP, Pirrallo, RG, Hegmann, KT. Hazardous materials readiness of United States level 1 trauma centers. J Occup Environ Med. 2000;42(7):683-692. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00043764-200007000-00002.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2. Okumura, T, Suzuki, K, Fukuda, A, et al. The Tokyo subway sarin attack: disaster management, Part 2: Hospital response. Acad Emerg Med. 1998;5(6):618-624. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1553-2712.1998.tb02471.x.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3. Okumura, T, Suzuki, K, Fukuda, A, et al. The Tokyo subway sarin attack: disaster management, Part 1: Community emergency response. Acad Emerg Med. 1998;5(6):613-617. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1553-2712.1998.tb02470.x.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4. US Chemical Saftety and Hazard Investigations Board. Chlorine release (66 sought medical evaluation) DPC Enterprises, L.P., Festus, Missouri, August 14, 2002. Washington, DC: U.S. Chemical Safety and Hazard Investigation Board; 2003.Google Scholar
5. Vogt, BM, Sorensen, JH. How clean is safe? Improving the effectiveness of decontamination of structures and people following chemical and biological incidents. http://emc.ornl.gov/publications/PDF/How_Clean_is_Safe.pdf. Published October 2002. Accessed September 15, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Lavoie, FW, Coomes, T, Cisek, JE, et al. Emergency department external decontamination for hazardous chemical exposure. Vet Hum Toxicol. 1992;34:61-64.Google ScholarPubMed
7. Cooper, D, Rice, N, Wilburn, R, et al. Acute public health consequences of methamphetamine laboratories--16 states, January 2000-June 2004. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2005;54:356-359.Google Scholar
8. Lambert, B. HAZ-MAT incident at Good Sam. WA AECP Reporter. 1996;7.Google Scholar
9. Trutt, J, Oster, NS. Hazardous materials events at a New York City trauma center. Ann Emerg Med. 1999;34(4):S54. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0196-0644(99)80293-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Cooper, D, Souther, L, Hanlon, D, et al. Public health consequences among first responders to emergency events associated with illicit methamphetamine laboratories--selected states, 1996-1999. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2000;49:1021-1024.Google Scholar
11. Merritt, NL, Anderson, MJ. Malathion overdose: when one patient creates a departmental hazard. J Emerg Nurs. 1989;15:463-465.Google ScholarPubMed
12. Duncan, MA, Orr, MF. Evolving with the times, the new national toxic substance incidents program. J Med Toxicol. 2010;6(4):461-463. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13181-010-0114-6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13. Horton, DK, Orr, M, Tsongas, T, Leiker, R, Kapil, V. Secondary contamination of medical personnel, equipment, and facilities resulting from hazardous materials events, 2003-2006. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2008;2(02):104-113. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/DMP.0b013e318166861c.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14. Horton, DK, Berkowitz, Z, Kaye, WE. Secondary contamination of ED personnel from hazardous materials events, 1995-2001. Am J Emerg Med. 2003;21(3):199-204. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0735-6757(02)42245-0.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15. Horton, DK, Burgess, P, Rossiter, S, Kaye, WE. Secondary contamination of emergency department personnel from o-chlorobenzylidene malononitrile exposure, 2002. Ann Emerg Med. 2005;45(6):655-658. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2005.01.031.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16. American Academy of Pediatrics. Overcrowding crisis in our nation’s emergency departments: is our safety net unraveling? Pediatrics. 2004;114(3):878-888. http://dx.doi.org/10.1542/peds.2004-1287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17. Reitherman, R. How to prepare a hospital for an earthquake. J Emerg Med. 1986;4(2):119-131. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0736-4679(86)90075-2.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18. Durkin, ME, Thiel, C. Improving measures to reduce earthquake casualties. Earthq Spectra. 1992;8(1):95-113. http://dx.doi.org/10.1193/1.1585672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19. Lindell, M, Perry, RW. Identifying and managing conjoint threats: earthquake-induced hazardous materials releases in the US. J Hazard Mater. 1996;50(1):31-46. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0304-3894(96)01764-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20. Auf der Heide, E. The importance of evidence-based disaster planning. Ann Emerg Med. 2006;47(1):34-49. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2005.05.009.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
21. US Department of Homeland Security, US Department of Health and Human Services. Patient Decontamination in a Mass Chemical Exposure Incident: National Planning for Communities. http://www.dhs.gov/sites/default/files/publications/Patient%20Decon%20National%20Planning%20Guidance_Final_December%202014.pdf. Published December 2014. Accessed September 16, 2015.Google Scholar
22. Scanlon, J. Chemically contaminated casualties: different problems and possible solutions. Am J Disaster Med. 2010;5:95-105.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
23. Occupational Safety and Health Administration. OSHA Best Practices for Hospital-Based First Receivers of Victims From Mass Casualty Incidents Involving the Release of Hazardous Substances. https://www.osha.gov/dts/osta/bestpractices/html/hospital_firstreceivers.html. Published January 2005. Accessed September 16, 2015.Google Scholar
24. Macintyre, AG, Barbera, JA. Disaster Management for Chemical Agents of Mass Destruction. In: Emergency Medicine: A Comprehensive Study Guide. 6th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2004:42-45.Google Scholar
25. Hick, JL, Hanfling, D, Burstein, JL, et al. Protective equipment for health care facility decontamination personnel: regulations, risks, and recommendations. Ann Emerg Med. 2003;42(3):370-380. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0196-0644(03)00447-5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
26. Hick, JL, Penn, P, Hanfling, D, Lappe, MA, O’laughlin, D, Burstein, JL. Establishing and training health care facility decontamination teams. Ann Emerg Med. 2003;42(3):381-390. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0196-0644(03)00442-6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
27. US Environmental Protection Agency. Local Emergency Planning Committees. http://www2.epa.gov/epcra/local-emergency-planning-committees. EPA website. Accessed September 16, 2015.Google Scholar
28. Toner, E, Waldhorn, R, Franco, C, Courtney, B, Rambhia, K, Norwood, A, Inglesby, T, et al. Hospitals Rising to the Challenge: The First Five Years of the U.S. Hospital Preparedness Program and Priorities Going Forward. http://www.upmchealthsecurity.org/our-work/pubs_archive/pubs-pdfs/2009/2009-04-16-hppreport.pdf. Published March 2009. Accessed September 16, 2015.Google Scholar
29. Geller, RJ, Singleton, KL, Tarantino, ML, et al. Nosocomial poisoning associated with emergency department treatment of organophosphate toxicity--Georgia, 2000. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2001;49:1156-1158.Google Scholar