Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T18:33:19.848Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Emergency Medical Services Response to a Major Freeway Bridge Collapse

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 April 2013

Abstract

Background: The Interstate 35W Bridge in Minneapolis collapsed into the Mississippi River on August 1, 2007, killing 13 people and injuring 127.

Methods: This article describes the emergency medical services response to this incident.

Results/Discussion: Complexities of the event included difficult patient access, multiple sectors of operation, and multiple mutual-aid agencies. Patient evacuation and transportation was rapid, with the collapse zone cleared of victims 95 minutes after the initial 9-1-1 call. A common regional emergency medical service incident management plan that was exercised was critical to the success of the response.

Conclusions: Communication and patient tracking difficulties could be improved in future responses. (Disaster Med Public Health Preparedness. 2008;2(Suppl 1):S17–S24)

Type
Original Research and Critical Analysis
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Disaster Medicine and Public Health, Inc. 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Wikipedia Web site. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_bridge_disasters. Accessed June 23, 2008.Google Scholar
2. The Collapse of the Schoharie Creek Bridge. http://www.eng.uab.edu/cee/faculty/ndelatte/case_studies_project/Schoharie.htm. Accessed June 23, 2008.Google Scholar
4.Wikipedia Web site. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mianus_River_Bridge. Accessed June 23, 2008.Google Scholar
5.Wikipedia Web site. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tacoma_Narrows_Bridge. Accessed June 23, 2008.Google Scholar
6.Wikipedia Web site. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loma_Prieta_earthquake. Accessed June 23, 2008.Google Scholar
7. Silver Bridge Disaster West Virginia Division of Culture and History Web site. http://www.wvculture.org/HiStory/disasters/silverbridge03.html. Accessed June 23, 2008.Google Scholar
10.Wikipedia Web site. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Northridge_earthquake. Accessed June 23, 2008.Google Scholar
11. Bridge Technology. Department of Transportation Web site. http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/bridge/defbr06.htm. Accessed June 23, 2008.Google Scholar
12. Metropolitan Emergency Services Board. EMS Preparedness Subcommittee. Minneapolis; 2008.Google Scholar
13.Benson, M, Koenig, KL, Schultz, CH.Disaster triage: START, then SAVE—a new method of dynamic triage for victims of a catastrophic earthquake. Prehosp Disaster Med. 1996;11:117124.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14.Ho, JD, Conterato, M, Mahoney, BD, et alSuccessful patient outcome after field extremity amputation and cardiac arrest. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2003;7:149153.Google Scholar
15.Hick, JL, Ho, JD.Ketamine chemical restraint to facilitate rescue of a combative “jumper.” Prehosp Emerg Care. 2005;9:8589.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16.Cone, DC, Weir, SD, Bogucki, S.Convergent volunteerism. Ann Emerg Med. 2003;41:457462.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17.Bultman, L, Hick, JL.Does START triage correspond to emergency department acuity? [abstract] Acad Emerg Med. 2005;12:167 .CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18.Sacco, WJ, Navin, DM, Fiedler, KE, et alPrecise formulation and evidence-based application of resource-constrained triage. Acad Emerg Med. 2005;12:759770.Google ScholarPubMed
19.Burstein, JL.The myths of disaster education. Ann Emerg Med. 2006;47:5052.Google Scholar