Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T20:30:42.189Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Theoretical Limology: Postmodern Analytical Approaches

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2024

Vladimir Kolossov
Vladimir Kolossov*
Affiliation:
Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The author aims to synthesize the content and principal results of four decisive stages in the development of research around borders. He redefines the concepts, methods and areas of application of those parts of the research. He stresses particularly the contemporary period, highlighting discussion of postmodern approaches. The first group of these approaches emphasizes the evolution of territorial identities and relations betweent centre and periphery, the main factors in establishing borders and their functions. The second group stresses the importance of geopolitical factors, including cultural differences between neighbouring territories. To a huge extent security considerations preoccupy this group, which tries to explain changes in border regimes. The third group is concerned with the influence of perceptions of the contemporary world's diversity on political elites and public opinion. Finally other approaches analyse borders starting from a combination of political and institutional factors as well as perceptions of cross-border networks at several territorial levels.

Type
Research Article
Information
Diogenes , Volume 53 , Issue 2 , May 2006 , pp. 11 - 22
Copyright
Copyright © ICPHS 2006

References

Aalto, P. (2002) ‘A European Geopolitical Subject in the Making? EU, Russia and the Kaliningrad Question’, Geopolitics 7(3): 143–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ackleson, J. (1999) ‘Metaphors and Community on the US–Mexican Border: Identity, Exclusion, Inclusion and “Operation Hold the Line”’, Geopolitics 4(2): 155–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agnew, J. (2001) ‘Bordering Europe and Bounding States: the ‘Civilizational’ Roots of European National Boundaries', in Kaplan, D. and Hakli, J. (eds), Borderlands and Place. Totowa, NJ: Rowman and Allanheld.Google Scholar
Agnew, J. and Toal, G. eds (2002) A Companion to Political Geography. Blackwell: Oxford.Google Scholar
Albert, M. (1998) ‘On Boundaries, Territory and Postmodernity’, Geopolitics 3(1): 53–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, M. (1996) Territory and State Formation in the Modern World. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Berg, E. and Oras, S. (2000) ‘Writing Post-Soviet Estonia onto the World Map’, Political Geography 19: 601–625.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blake, G. H. (2000) ‘Borderlands Under Stress: Some Global Perspectives’, in Pratt, M. and Brown, J. (eds), Borderlands Under Stress, pp. 1–16. London: Kluwer Law International.Google Scholar
Brunn, S. (1998) ‘A Treaty of Silicon for the Treaty of Westphalia? New Territorial Dimensions of Modern Statehood’, Geopolitics 3(1): 106–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delamide, D. (1994) The New Superregions of Europe. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Dijkink, G. (1996) National Identity and Geopolitical Visions: Maps of Pride and Pain. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Foucher, M. (1991) Fronts et Frontières: Un tour du monde géopolitique. Paris: Fayard.Google Scholar
Galtung, J. (1994) ‘Coexistence in Spite of Borders: On the Borders in the Mind’, in Galluser, W. (ed.), Political Boundaries and Coexistence. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Giddens, A. (1981) The Nation State and Violence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Helliwell, J. (1998) How Much Do National Borders Matter? New York: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
House, J. W. (1982) Frontier on the Rio Grande: A Political Geography of Development and Social Deprivation. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Kolossov, V. A. (1996) ‘Traditional Geopolitical Concepts and Contemporary Challenges to Russia’, Social Sciences and Modernity no. 3 (in Russian).Google Scholar
Kolossov, V. A. (2000) ‘Ethnic and Political Identities and Territorialities in the Post-Soviet Space’, GeoJournal 48: 71–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kolossov, V. A., ed. (2003) The World in the Eyes of Russian Citizens: Myths and Foreign Policy. Moscow: FOM (in Russian).Google Scholar
Kolossov, V. A. and Mironenko, N. S. (2001) Geopolitics and Political Geography. Moscow: Aspekt-Press (in Russian).Google Scholar
Kolossov, V. and O'Loughlin, J. (1998) ‘New Borders for New World Orders: Territorialities at the Fin-de-Siècle’, GeoJournal 44(3): 259–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kolossov, V. A. and Turovsky, R. F. (1998) ‘Contemporary State Borders: New Functions under the Conditions of Integration and Border Cooperation’, Izvestia RAN (Journal of the Russian Academy of Sciences) geographical series, no. 1.Google Scholar
Kolossov, V. A., Galkina, T. A. and Krindatch, A. D. (2001) ‘Territorial Identity and Inter-ethnic Relations (The Case of Eastern Districts of Stavropopol Territory)’, Polis (Political Studies) no. 2: 61–78.Google Scholar
Lattinen, K. (2001) ‘The Northern Dimension in the Context of the Security Border’, paper submitted to the Fifth Conference on Border Regions in Transition, Tartu, July.Google Scholar
Lattinen, K. (2003) ‘Post-Cold War Security Borders: A Conceptual Approach’, in Berg, E. and Houtum, H. van (eds) Routing Borders between Territories, Discourses and Practices, pp. 13–34. Burlington, VT: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Lunden, T. (2001) ‘The Domain of Time Geography. A Focus on Political Geography?’, in Antonsich, M., Kolossov, V. and Pagnini, M.-P. (eds), Europe Between Political Geography and Geopolitics, Vol. 1, pp. 269–278. Rome: Societa Geografica Italiana.Google Scholar
Lunden, T. and Zalamans, D. (2000) Boundary Towns: Studies of Communication and Boundaries in Estonia and Its Neighbours. Stockholm: Stockholm University.Google Scholar
Macmillan, J. and Linklater, A., eds (1995) Boundaries in Question: New Directions in International Relations. London and New York: Frances Pinter.Google Scholar
Martinez, O. (1994) Border People: Life and Society in U.S.–Mexico Borderlands. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Medvedev, S. (2001) ‘North and the Politics of Emptiness’, paper submitted to the workshop ‘Identity Politics, Security and the Making of Geopolitical Order in the Baltic’, Kuusamo, Finland, June.Google Scholar
Minghi, J. (1963) ‘Boundary Studies in Political Geography’, Annals of the Association of American Geographers 53: 407–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moisio, S. (2002) ‘EU Eligibility, Central Europe, and the Invention of Applicant State Narrative’, Geopolitics 7(3): 89–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newman, D. (1999) ‘Into the Millennium: the Study of International Boundaries in an Era of Global and Technological Change’, Boundary and Security Bulletin 7(4): 63–71.Google Scholar
Newman, D. (2001) ‘Boundaries, Territory and Postmodernity: Towards Shared or Separate Spaces?’, in Pratt, M. and Brown, J. (eds), Borderlands Under Stress, pp. 17–34. London: Kluwer Law International.Google Scholar
Newman, D. (2002) ‘The Lines that Separate Boundaries and Borders in Political Geography’, in Agnew, J. and Toal, G. (eds), A Companion to Political Geography. Blackwell: Oxford.Google Scholar
Newman, D. and Paasi, A. (1998) ‘Fences and Neighbours in the Post-modern World: Boundary Narratives in Political Geography’, Progress in Human Geography 22(2): 186–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ohmae, K. (1995) The End of the Nation State: The Rise of Regional Economies. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
O'Loughlin, J., O'Tuathail, G. and Kolossov, V. (2004b) ‘Russian Geopolitical Storylines and Ordinary Russians in the Wake of 9-11’, Communist and Post-Communist Studies 37: 281–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Tuathail, G. (2002) ‘Theorizing Practical Geopolitical Reasoning: The Case of U.S. Bosnia Policy in 1992’, Political Geography 21(5): 601–628.Google Scholar
Paasi, A. (1996) Territories, Boundaries and Consciousness: The Changing Geographies of the Finnish-Russian Border. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Pratt, M. and Brown, J., eds (2000) Borderlands Under Stress. London: Kluwer Law Academic.Google Scholar
Prescott, J. (1999) ‘Borders in a Borderless World: Review Essay’, Geopolitics 4(2).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rumley, D. and Minghi, J., eds (1991) The Geography of Border Landscapes. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Sahlins, P. (1989) Boundaries: The Making of France and Spain in the Pyrenees. Berkeley: SAGE Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, J. W. (2000) ‘Euroregions, Governance and Transborder Co-operation within the EU’, European Research in Regional Science, Vol. 10 (Border, Regions and People): 104–115.Google Scholar
Taylor, P. J. (1994) ‘The State as Container: Territoriality in the Modern World-system’, Progress in Human Geography 18: 151–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, P. J. and Flint, C. (2000) Political Geography, World-economy, Nation-state and Locality. Harlow: Prentice Hall (Longman), 4th edn.Google Scholar
Toal, G. (1996) Critical Geopolitics: The Politics of Writing Global Space. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Van Houtum, H. (1999) ‘Internationalization and Mental Borders’, Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie 90(3): 329–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vardomsky, L. B. and Golunov, S. V., eds (2002) Prozrachnye granitsy. Bezopasnost i sotrudnichetsvo v poyase novykh grnits Rossii (Transparent Borders. Security and Cooperation in the Belt of New Borders of Russia). Moscow: NOFMO (in Russian).Google Scholar
Chung-Tong, Wu (1998) ‘Cross-border Development in Europe and Asia’, Geojournal 44(3): 189–201.Google Scholar
Young, O., ed. (1997) ‘Global Governance. Towards a Theory of Decentralized World Order’, in Young, O. D. (ed.), Global Governance. Drawing Insights from the Environmental Experience, pp. 273–299. Cambridge, MA and London: MIT Press.Google Scholar