Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T02:55:27.269Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Symmetry Physics and Information Theory

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2024

Ernest H. Hutten
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

There are three main issues I wish to discuss here. First, I want to point out the changing pattern of scientific explanation in physics. Briefly speaking, the model of Nature underlying the explanatory schemes has become more realistic. Communication is substituted for causality, or information flow for the simple energy flow described by the equation of motion. The second point I want to make is to explain modern symmetry physics in terms of information theory. Finally, last and not least, my third issue is to show how this new conception of scientific method can help us to understand the human (or life or social) sciences.

Type
Research Article
Information
Diogenes , Volume 18 , Issue 72 , December 1970 , pp. 1 - 21
Copyright
Copyright © 1970 Fédération Internationale des Sociétés de Philosophie / International Federation of Philosophical Societies (FISP)

References

References

Frazer, W., Elementary Particles, Prentice-Hall, New York, 1966.Google Scholar
Hutten, E.H., The Ideas of Physics, London, 1967.Google Scholar
Salam, A., Math. Journal, 1968.Google Scholar
Wigner, E., Scientific American, 1967.Google Scholar
Wu, E., Am. J. of Physics.Google Scholar
Bonsack, F., Information, thermodynamique, vie et pensée, Paris, 1961.Google Scholar
Hutten, E.H., Scientia 56, 1–10, 1962; 58, 1–8, 1964; 60, 3–9, 1966.Google Scholar
Moles, A., Information Theory and Esthetic Perception, Illinois, 1966.Google Scholar
Frazer, W., Elementary Particles, Prentice-Hall, New York, 1966.Google Scholar
Hutten, E.H., The Ideas of Physics, London, 1967.Google Scholar
Salam, A., Math. Journal, 1968.Google Scholar
Wigner, E., Scientific American, 1967.Google Scholar
Wu, E., Am. J. of Physics.Google Scholar
Bonsack, F., Information, thermodynamique, vie et pensée, Paris, 1961.Google Scholar
Hutten, E.H., Scientia 56, 1–10, 1962; 58, 1–8, 1964; 60, 3–9, 1966.Google Scholar
Moles, A., Information Theory and Esthetic Perception, Illinois, 1966.Google Scholar

Mind-Body problem:

Hutten, E.H., Methods 5, 187–202, 1954; B. J. Phil. Sci. 7, 73–85, 1956; Rationalist Ann., 1960; American Imago 18, 269–277,1961; Rationalist Ann., 1965.Google Scholar
Somenzi, V., Critico, G. Fil. Ital., III, IV, 1967; De Homine, No. 15/16.Google Scholar

Methodology:

Bridgman, P., How Things Are, Harvard, 1959.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charms, R. De, Personal Causation, Acad. P., New York, 1968.Google Scholar
Hutten, E.H., The Language of Modern Physics, London, 1959; The Origins of Science, London, 1962.Google Scholar
Louch, A.R., Explanation and Human Action, Blackwell, Oxford, 1966.Google Scholar
Peters, R.S., The Concept of Motivation, Routledge, London, 1958.Google Scholar
Rickman, H., Understanding and the Human Sciences, Heinemann, London, 1967.Google Scholar
Russell, Bertrand, Mysticism and Logic.Google Scholar
Scheffler, , Science and Subjectivity, New York, 1967.Google Scholar
Tucker, J., Proc. Aristotelian Soc., Feb. 1970.Google Scholar