Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T03:31:30.839Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Stalin and the Blue Elephant: Paranoia and Complicity in Postcommunist Metahistories

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2024

Caroline Humphrey
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

This paper analyses certain contemporary narratives among Buryats of Russia and China. At issue is the nature of responsibility for the campaigns of terror, in particular the devastation of the Buddhist church in the 1930s. In these accounts political leaders appear as reincarnations, destined to unleash terrible events. Stalin, for example, is said by Buryat Mongol villagers to have been the reincarnation of a Blue Elephant which lived in ancient times in India. I examine local discussions around these stories to suggest that the narrators, themselves having been caught up in the seemingly objective and transparent, yet deeply irrational, accounts of the Party-State, do not (at any rate at present) confront actions in which they were both perpetrators and victims ‘matter-of-factly’. Having been a particular target of the Stalinist all-pervasive organisation of suspicion and punishment, Buryat Buddhists today are creating ‘paranoid narratives’ of their own to explain the repressions - a narrative of displacement, in which the actions attributed to an other (in this case Stalin) are in some way ‘about’ oneself. The reincarnation stories point up the crucial moral issue erased by socialist metahistory, the ethical problem of individual accountability. They are about complicity, for they reveal an uneasy, and probably unconscious, identification with Stalin.

Type
Research Article
Information
Diogenes , Volume 49 , Issue 194 , June 2002 , pp. 26 - 34
Copyright
Copyright © ICPHS 2002

References

Bhabha, Homi 1997 'Of mimicry and man: the ambivalence of colonial discourse,' in Cooper, F. and Stoler, A.L. (eds.) Tensions of Empire: Colonial Cultures in a Bourgeois World, Univerisyt of California Press, Berkeley and London, 152–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freud, Sigmund 1960 The Psychopathology of Everyday Life, Standard Edition of the Complete Works, vol. VI (1901), trs. J. Strachey with A. Freud, The Hogarth Press, London.Google Scholar
Gravers, Mikael 1999 [1993] Nationalism as Political Paranoia in Burma: an essay on the historical practice of power, Nordic Institute of Asian Studies, Curzon, Richmond.Google Scholar
Getty, J. Arch and Naumov, Oleg V. 1999 The Road to Terror: Stalin and the Self-Destruction of the Bolsheviks, 1932-1939, Yale University Press, New Haven and London.Google Scholar
Humphrey, Caroline 1994 'Remembering an Enemy: the Bogd Khaan in Twentieth Century Mongolia’, in Watson, R. (ed.) Memory, History and Opposition under State Socialism, School of American Research: Santa Fé.Google Scholar
Humphrey, Caroline 1997 ‘Genres and diversity in cultural politics: on representations of the Goddess Tara in Mongolia,' Inner Asia: Occasional Papers, 2(1), 24–47.Google Scholar
Namsaraeva, Sayana 1998 'Khambo-lama: karma Rossii - v postoyannom bespokoistve,' Kommersant'-Vlast’, 7 (259), 50–52.Google Scholar
Schoenhals, Michael 1992 Doing Things with Words in Chinese Politics: Five Studies, China Research Monograph 41, Unversity of California Press, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Weiner, James 1999 'Psycholanalysis and anthropology: on the temporality of analysis,' in Moore, Henrietta (ed.) Anthropological Theory Today, Cambridge, Polity Press, 234–257.Google Scholar
Akexei, Yurchak. (forthcoming) 'Hegemony of form: the unexpected outcome of the Soviet linguistic project'.Google Scholar
Zhukovskaya, N.L. 1998 'Atlas Tibetskoi meditsiny: na perekrestke religii i politiki,' Etnos i Religiya, Institut Etnologii i Antropologii, 227–42.Google Scholar
Zizek, Slavoi 1999 ‘When the Party commits suicide,' New Left Review, 238, 26–47.Google Scholar