Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-l4dxg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-13T02:48:26.002Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Postmodern Liberalism as a New Humanism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2024

Andrzej Szahaj
Andrzej Szahaj*
Affiliation:
Nicolaus Copernicus University, Torun

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

John Gray argues that the modern conception of man is common for all variants of the liberal tradition. The version of liberalism which is defended in this paper cannot be called ‘classical’ because it refuses the conception in question (it refuses such elements of it as, for example, claims of universality, idea of neutral Reason, idea of human nature). That is why the best label which can be given to it is ‘postmodern’ or ‘communitarian’ liberalism. Moreover, postmodern liberalism does not express any reluctance toward community as such. It only requires a community which respects the rights of individuals to autonomous, moral and comprehensive choices. In this sense one can say that postmodern liberalism renounces anti-social biases while remaining faithful to individualism, which - starting with the social and the common - arrives at the truly individual. In this way it can revitalize the sense and meaning of humanism understood as the idea of life of human beings who can create their own lives independently and freely in the political and social milieu, promoting justice and solidarity.

Type
Research Article
Information
Diogenes , Volume 52 , Issue 2 , May 2005 , pp. 63 - 70
Copyright
Copyright © ICPHS 2005

References

Beiner, R. (1992) What’s the Matter with Liberalism? Berkeley: SAGE Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dworkin, R. (1978) Liberalism, in Hamsphire, S. (ed.) Public and Private Morality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Galston, W. (1989), ‘Pluralism and Social Unity’, Ethics 99: 711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, J. (1986) Liberalism. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Kelly, M. (1991) ‘MacIntyre, Habermas, Ethics’, in Kelly, M. (ed.) Hermeneutics and Critical Theory in Ethics and Politics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kowalczyk, S. (1995) Liberalizm i jego filozofia. Katowice.Google Scholar
Larmore, C. (1990) ‘Political Liberalism’, Political Theory 18(3): 340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rorty, R. (1997) ‘Sprawiedliwosc jako poszerzona lojalnosc’, Transit, no.3.Google Scholar