Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T21:04:23.181Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Place of Oil Painting in Art

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 April 2024

Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

At the moment of its decline, we clearly see that painting in oils developed an original poetics, and one that was all of a piece, throughout a renascent and modern West. From its birth and during a development lasting half a millennium we see it— in Florence, Bruges, Venice, Rome, Toledo, Nuremberg, Amsterdam and Paris—attentive to the sources of signification: languages, rites, myths, theater, tools, techniques and sciences and the urban context that wove them all together. In each case, for one or the other of them, it brought a new relationship to the way of life and then left them to their social order of assimilation, keeping the initial contact for those who would be interested. It studded the West with centers of production that carried the practice and knowledge of art to their limits; engaged with the collective imagination, it punctuated history with decisive works, in which the desire to paint takes action and explains it. Marked by an impatience for change, oil painting revealed itself in a rapport with creativity akin to the other works of civilization. It is at the level of the bases of invention of the imaginary—which are in any expression the most profound structures—that the unfolding of oil painting is tightly bound. The establishment of modern national languages, the orderly rise, around a syntax and because of architecture, sculpture, music, song, tragedy, the systematic construction of scientific and technical expression, arose and grew quickly in importance in Western Europe during the same centuries as painting and with reciprocal correspondence. Dürer “who was the first to publish a treatise in which is collected all knowledge having to do with the expression of forms… wrote in his native tongue and in so doing was revealed as the creator of technical and scientific German.”

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 1980 Fédération Internationale des Sociétés de Philosophie / International Federation of Philosophical Societies (FISP)

References

1 Prigogine and Stengers, La Nouvelle alliance, "Bibliothèque des sciences humaines," Paris, N.R.F., 1979, p. 295.

2 A. Flocon and R. Taton, La Perspective, in "Que Sais-je?," P.U.F., 1963.

3 M. Merleau-Ponty, L'Oeil et l'esprit, Paris, Gallimard, 1964.

4 P. Valéry, Les Cahiers, Bibliothèque de la Pléiade, Paris, N.R.F., 1974, II, p. 40.

5 L. Marin, Etudes sémiologiques. Ecritures, peintures, Paris, Klincksieck, 1972.

6 P. Fleury, "La Vision," in Encyclopaedia Universalis, Paris, 1975, XVI, p. 897.

7 M. Heidegger, Approche d'Hölderlin, Paris, N.F.R., 1972.

8 E. Panofsky, La perspective comme forme symbolique, Paris, Ed. de Minuit, 1975, p. 45.

9 A. Flocon, op. cit.

10 S. Mallarmé, Oeuvres complètes, "Jamais un coup de dés n'abolira le hasard," Bibl. de la Pléiade, Paris, Gallimard.

11 Francastel, Peinture et société, Coll. "Idées/arts," Paris, N.R.F., 1965.

12 H. Damisch, "L'origine de la perspective," in Macula, 5/6, Paris, 1979.

13 Leroi-Gourhan, Le Geste et la parole, Paris, Albin Michel, 1965.