No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
The Mythology of Begetting and Sex in the Church Fathers' Writings
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 February 2024
Abstract
Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
The intervention of the divine in human history, more precisely the transition from fiction to incarnation that is peculiar to the origins of Christianity, marks a turning-point in our understanding of the genealogical principle. With a Son of Man who is also Son of God and his Mother's Father, there is no paternity and, more generally, no genealogy that is not reversible. To this questioning of elementary kinship structures we should add the contesting of the hitherto accepted distribution of genders and sexes. The superimposition of the Holy Family and the Trinity created an uncertain sex whose effect is to uncouple sex from its functions, in particular procreation. Hence a circulation and instability of sex. It is from this viewpoint that we should see the notion of an androgynous Christ and the Church Fathers’ thinking on the resurrected body.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © ICPHS 2005
References
Aquinas, Thomas (1996) De rationibus fidei contra Saracenos, Graecos et Armenos ad Cantorem Antiochenum, trans. Kenney, Joseph, Islamochristiana, 22, pp. 31–52.Google Scholar
Bertin, Francis (1986) ‘Corps spirituel et androgyne chez Jean Scot Erigène’, in L'Androgyne. Cahiers de l'Hermétisme. Paris: Albin Michel.Google Scholar
Buell, Denise K. (1999) Making Christians: Clement of Alexandria and the Rhetoric of Legitimacy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delahaye, Karl (1958) Erneuerung der Seelsorgsformen aus der Sicht der frühen Patristik. Freiburg: Herder.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques (1978) Writing and Difference, trans. A. Bass. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques (1987) ‘Geschlecht.Différence sexuelle, différence ontologique’, in Derrida, J., Psyché, pp. 395–414. Paris: Galilée.Google Scholar
Didier, Hughes (2000) ‘Le secret, gardé par des hommes, d'un Dieu féminin’, Sigila6: 27–40.Google Scholar
Ferroul, Yves, ed. (1996) Héloïse et Abélard. Lettres et vies. Paris: Garnier-Flammarion.Google Scholar
Geoltrain, Pierre (1998) ‘Hilaire de Poitiers: de la Trinité à la question du langage’, in Legendre, P. (ed.) Du pouvoir de diviser les mots et les choses, pp. 15–24. Travaux du Laboratoire européen pour l'étude de la filiation. Brussels: Yves Gevaert Éditeur.Google Scholar
Haddad, Rachid (1985) La Trinité divine chez les théologiens arabes (750–1050). Paris: Beauchesne.Google Scholar
Hammam, Adalbert-Gautier, ed. (1990) Le Martyre dans l'Antiquité chrétienne. Paris: Migne.Google Scholar
Kantorowicz, Ernest (1957) The King's Two Bodies: A Study in Mediaeval Political Theology. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Legendre, Pierre (2000) Le Crime du caporal Lortie. Traité sur le Père. Paris: Flammarion.Google Scholar
Leupin, Alexandre (2000b) Phallophanies. La chair et le sacré. Paris: Éditions du Regard.Google Scholar
Lévi-Strauss, Claude (1992) ‘A Small Mythico-Literary Puzzle’, in The View from Afar, trans. J. Neugroschel and Ph. Hoss. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Mallenkrott, Virginia (1983) The Divine Feminine: the Biblical Imagery of God as Female. New York: Crossroad.Google Scholar
Ranke-Heinemann, Uta (1990) Eunuchs for the Kingdom of Heaven: Women, Sexuality, and the Catholic Church, trans. P. Heinegg. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Schefer, Jean-Louis (1975) L'invention du corps chrétien: Saint Augustin, le dictionnaire, la mémoire. Paris: Galilée.Google Scholar
Steinberg, Leo (1983) The Sexuality of Christ in Renaissance Art and in Modern Oblivion. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
You have
Access