Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T12:21:56.038Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Moral Crisis in Post-Mao China: Prolegomenon to a Philosophical Analysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2024

Ci Jiwei*
Affiliation:
University of Hong Kong
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

For quite some time there has been a collective perception of a moral crisis in post-Mao China. This perception is informed by standards held by members of Chinese society rather than by standards outside of it. In this article, the author attempts to lay the groundwork for a philosophical analysis of this moral crisis. He first explains why it is appropriate to speak of a moral crisis and then examines the structure of the crisis. This examination is partly conceptual and partly causal. The conceptual section of the article discusses terms frequently used in connection with the crisis and introduces some terms and distinctions of the author's own for further clarity. The causal section traces the moral crisis to a crisis of identification with moral authority or exemplars, the latter crisis in turn containing important clues to the structure of self and agency in Chinese moral culture.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © ICPHS 2009

References

Jiwei, Ci (1994) Dialectic of the Chinese Revolution: From Utopianism to Hedonism. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Jiwei, Ci (2006) The Two Faces of Justice. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Zhifeng, Liu (ed.) (1999) Daode Zhongguo. Beijing: Zhongguo shehui kexue chubanshe.Google Scholar
Daosheng, Shao (1996) Zhongguo shehui de kunhuo. Beijing: Shehui wenxian chubanshe.Google Scholar
Xiaoying, Wang (2002) ‘The Post-Communist Personality: The Spectre of China's Capitalist Market Reforms’, The China Journal 47: 117.Google Scholar