Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T21:43:43.159Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Manifestations of Fashion as a Phenomenon of Social Psychology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2024

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The phenomena of fashion are inextricably mixed with an infinite variety of behaviours that challenges simple enumeration. A theory offers itself nonetheless in the form of an explicit description of the structures that support its evolution. Meeting the phenomena of fashion in their most disconcerting characters—their omnipresence, the paradox of an imitative behaviour that serves the prestige of the individual, their changes—we set ourselves to isolate the principles on which it works. Thus, in the course of investigation, we have been put in possession of an explanatory model of which it will be sufficient for us to verify if it regulates the other aspects under which fashion can appear. A model that is simple enough, because we propose to show that one has said everything that the manifestations of fashion can be when one has recognised there a manifestation of sociability, of imitative origin and playful character.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 1969 Fédération Internationale des Sociétés de Philosophie / International Federation of Philosophical Societies (FISP)

References

1 Stoetzel, " Les Phénomènes collectifs de la mode," La psychologie sociale, Paris, Flammarion, 1963. pp. 245-249.

2 J.-L. Moreno, Psychothérapie de groupe et psychodrame, Paris, P.U.F., 1965, p. 108.

3 S. Freud, Pour introduire le narcissisme.

4 Barbey d'Aurevilly, Du Dandysme et de Georges Brummel; J.-P. Sartre, Baudelaire, Paris, N.R.F., coll. Idées; R. Merle, Oscar Wilde, Paris, N.R.F.

5 E. Radar, "The Study of Mime as a Manifestation of Sociability, as a Play and Artistic Expression," in Diogenes, No. 50, Summer 1965.

6 R. Barthes, Système de la Mode, Paris, éd. du Seuil, 1966.

7 Apprenticeship in a mime does not indicate apprenticeship by imitation; the gesture must be put en rapport with the bio-psychic imperatives of the subject; that is to say with a basic pulse indefinitely active. There is then an original dynamism in all mime, although there is also an element of imitation. Cfr. G. Durand, Structures anthropologiques de l'imaginaire, 1963.

8 Buytendyck, Phénoménologie de la rencontre, Bruges, Desclée de Brouwer.

9 J. C. Fluegel, Psychology of Clothes, London, Hogarth, 1939.

10 W. W. Rostow, The Process of Economic Development.

11 H. Van Lier, "Culture et Industrie: le design," in Critique, November, 1967, No. 246.

12 P. Ledrut, Sociologie urbaine, Paris, P.U.F., 1968.

13 H. Marcuse, One-Dimensional Man, Boston, Mass., Beacon Press, 1966.

14 H. Lefebvre, Le Langage et la société, Paris, N.R.F., Coll. Idées, 1966.

15 "Transference establishes itself spontaneously in all human relations as well as in the relationship between doctor and patient; it conveys throughout the therapeutic influence and it operates with more force in that one scarcely suspects its existence." S. Freud, Cinq Leçons sur la Psychanalyse, Paris, Payot, 1966.

16 Huizinga, Homo ludens, trans. by Seresia, Paris, N.R.F., 1951; E. Finck, Le jeu comme symbole du monde, trans. by Hildebrand and Lindenberg, Paris, éd. de Minuit, 1966.

17 Benvéniste, "Le Jeu comme structure," Deucalion, No. 2, Paris, 1945.

18 H. Marcuse, Eros and Civilization, Boston, Mass., Beacon Press, 1955.

19 R. Caillois, Les jeux et les hommes, Paris, N.R.F., 1958.

20 Lévy-Bruhl, La mentalité primitive, Paris, Alcan, 1925.

21 Montesquieu, Spirit of the Laws, Book IV, ch. II.