Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T13:45:51.955Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

‘Human, Still Human!’

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2024

Jérôme Bindé*
Affiliation:
Assistant deputy director general for social and human science, Director of the UNESCO Division for future thinking, philosophy and human sciences
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

For more than a century the shifts in western thought have witnessed: the death of God, the demise of political ideologies that appeared to have taken over from ‘divine’ values, and the solitude of the disoriented individual. The individual's malaise may be the symptom of a questioning of the very notion of being human. Adopting the critique of humanism introduced by Nietzsche, Sloterdijk highlights the fact that human beings may have escaped bestiality by the very means they use to tame animals to serve them. What should we say of what research currently allows us to do on human beings? Manipulation of the living has allowed us to glimpse the possibility of a factory for the human. The choices we shall have to make as to the future of the human remain above all political. The word ‘humanism’ is complex: there are two types of humanism. One thinks of the human as an essence. The second form considers that there is no human nature: we become human. The human world is open to creation, but fragile because it is placed under our responsibility.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © ICPHS 2005

References

Foucault, M. (1984) Histoire de la sexualité, III. Le souci de soi. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Fukuyama, Francis (1992) The End of History and the Last Man. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Raison Présente (2003) ‘Biotechnologies et frontières de l’humain: les thèses de Peter Sloterdijk’, no. 145, 1st quarter: 75-!90.Google Scholar
Ricœur, P. (1990) Soi-même comme un autre. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
Serres, Michel (2001) Hominescence. Paris: Le Pommier.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sloterdijk, Peter (2000), Règles pour le parc humain. Editions Mille et une nuit.Google Scholar
Stiegler, Bernard (2002) ‘La science décapitée?’, Technoscience et reproduction, September. Pekea Seminar, Santiago de Chile (www.pekea.org).Google Scholar