Hostname: page-component-f554764f5-rj9fg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-22T02:41:08.571Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Gender: Still a Useful Category of Analysis?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2024

Joan Wallach Scott
Joan Wallach Scott*
Affiliation:
Institute for Advanced Study
Get access

Abstract

This paper traces the history of uses of the word “gender”. It suggests that though “gender” has been recuperated and become commonplace, many issues persist around the way “women” and “men”, and the power relations between them, are defined and are evolving. Provided it still allows us to question the meanings attached to the sexes, how they are established and in what contexts, gender remains a useful, because critical, analytical category.

Type
Articles
Information
Diogenes , Volume 57 , Issue 1 , February 2010 , pp. 7 - 14
Copyright
Copyright © ICPHS 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Bereni, L., Chauvin, S., Jaunait, A., Revillard, A. (2008) Introduction aux Gender Studies: Manuel des études sur le genre. Bruxelles: De Boeck.Google Scholar
Butler, Judith (1990) Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Commission générale de terminologie et de néologie (2005) “Recommandation sur les équivalents français du mot ‘gender’”, J.O., July 22.Google Scholar
Haraway, Donna (1991) “‘Gender’ for a Marxist Dictionary: The Sexual Politics of a Word”, dans Id., Simians, Cyborgs, and Women: The Reinvention of Nature. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Modeleski, Tania (1991) Feminism Without Women: Culture and Criticism in a Postfeminist Age. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Riley, Denise (1988) “Am I That Name?" Feminisn and the Category of “Women” in History. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Scott, Joan W. (1986) “Gender: A Useful Category of Historical Analysis”, American Historical Review, 91: 1053–1075.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, Joan W. (1988) Gender and the Politics of History. New York: Columbia UP.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nations, United (1995) Report of the Fourth World Conference on Women (Beijing, 4-15 September), www.un.org/womenwatch/daw/beijing/official.htm.Google Scholar
United Nations Commission on the Status of Women (1996) Report of the United Nations Conference on Human Settlements (Habitat II), Istanbul 3-14 June. Annexe v: “Statement on the Commonly Understood Meaning of the Term ‘Gender ’”.Google Scholar
United States House of Representatives (1995) 104th Congress, First Session. Committee on Internal Relations. ”United Nations Fourth World Conference on Women: Hearings Before the Subcommittee on International Operations and Human Rights, July 18 and August 2, 1995”. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Weed, Elizabeth (2007) “Joan W. Scott’s Useful Category of Analysis”, unpublished paper presented at the conference In Terms of Gender, Center for 21st Century Studies, University of Wisconsin, Madison, May 4-5.Google Scholar